Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/127,410

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SURGICAL GUIDANCE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 05, 2025
Priority
Nov 04, 2022 — provisional 63/422,897 +1 more
Examiner
SURGAN, ALEXANDRA L
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kaliber Labs Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
247 granted / 518 resolved
-22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
555
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 518 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I in the reply filed on 09/30/2026 is acknowledged. Status of Claims Claims 1, 8, 11, 16, 23, and 26 are pending, claims 11, 16, 23, and 26 have been withdrawn from consideration, and claims 1 and 8 are currently under consideration for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104 Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/05/2025, 08/06/2025, 12/10/2025, and 10/01/2026 have been considered by the examiner. Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) The current application has been granted participation in the Patent Prosecution Highyway (PPH) program. Any claims amended or added after the grant of the request for participation in the Global/IP5 PPH pilot program must sufficiently correspond to one or more allowable/patentable claims in the OEE application. The applicant is required to submit, along with the amendment, a statement certifying that the amended or newly added claims sufficiently correspond to the allowable/patentable claims in the OEE application. If the certification statement is omitted, the amendment will not be entered and will be treated as a non-responsive reply. A claim is considered to sufficiently correspond where the claim is of the same or similar scope as an allowable claim in the related OEE application. A claim that is narrower in scope than an allowable OEE claim will also sufficiently correspond if it presented as a claim dependent upon a claim that is of the same or similar scope to an allowable OEE claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wong et al. (US 2019/0298451) in view of Lamprecht et al. (US 2007/0156017). With respect to claim 1, Wong et al. teaches a method of providing surgical guidance during a surgical procedure, the method comprising: displaying, during the surgical procedure, a three-dimensional (3D) navigation guide of a surgical site to a user (320), wherein the 3D navigation guide is initially set to a placeholder 3D navigation guide (para [0037]); taking, by the user, an endoscopic video stream of the surgical site during the surgical procedure (para [0039]); generating, from the endoscopic video stream of the surgical site, a surgical 3D navigation guide (340), wherein the surgical 3D navigation guide is navigable and explorable using digital navigational controls (para [0049]-[0050] for example); replacing all or a portion of the 3D navigation guide with the surgical 3D navigation guide so that the user may manipulate and consult the 3D navigation guide during the surgical procedure (355). However, Wong et al. does not teach transmitting a copy of the 3D navigation guide that has been partially or completely replaced with the surgical 3D navigation guide to a party that is remote from the surgical procedure for separate and/or concurrent analysis to form an annotated copy of the 3D navigation guide. With respect to claim 1, Lamprecht et al. teaches transmitting a copy of 3D images to a party that is remote from the surgical procedure (para [0031]-[0036], FIG. 1) for separate and/or concurrent analysis to form an annotated copy of the 3D image (para [0030] for example). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify Wong et al. to incorporate remote telestration in the manner taught by Lamprecht et al. in order to allow a teacher or instructor to provide comments and instructions to the operator regarding the surgical procedure (para [0030] of Lamprecht et al.). With respect to claim 8, Lamprecht et al. teaches combining the annotated copy of the 3D image with the 3D image (para [0033]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alexandra Newton Surgan whose telephone number is (571)270-1618. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Carey can be reached at (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALEXANDRA L. SURGAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3795 /ALEXANDRA L NEWTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765754
ENDOSCOPE HAVING AN ADJUSTABLE BRAKING MECHANISM
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12745896
ENDOSCOPE AND METHOD OF USE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12727951
ROBOTIC BRONCHOSCOPY NAVIGATION METHOD AND SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721642
Extendable Ureteroscope Sheath
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714297
ENDOSCOPE WITH PIVOTING LIGHTING
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+28.6%)
3y 11m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month