Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/128,957

LIVE STREAMING INTERACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
Nov 10, 2022 — CN 202211407217.5 +1 more
Examiner
RIAZ, SAHAR AQIL
Art Unit
2424
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
376 granted / 501 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
517
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 501 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Oath/Declaration Applicant is requested to file an Oath/Declaration with the inventor’s signature. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/09/2025 and 06/22/2026 is being considered by the examiner. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6, 10-11, 14-15 and 19-21 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 7-9, 17, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hartnett et al. US Patent Publication No. 2022/0116435 in view of April et al. US Patent Publication No. 2020/0021892. Regarding Claim 1, Hartnett discloses a method for live streaming interaction [Figures 3A-3B], comprising: displaying a select control for supporting a user in selecting a first participant from a plurality of participants, wherein the plurality of participants are participants associated with a live streaming event in a live streaming channel [0045]; displaying, in response to receiving a user selection for the select control, a plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants [0107 & Figures 6A& 6B]. Hartnett fails to clearly disclose associating a user account of the user with the first participant and displaying a user input of the user. In an analogous art, April discloses associating a user account of the user [0204] with the first participant in response to receiving a user selection for the first participant among the plurality of participants [0029, 0065 & 0104; user subscribes to the broadcaster]; and displaying a user input of the user in association with the first participant in a live streaming interface [0017; a viewer following a particular broadcaster may purchase digital beers, various digital concession stand items, ticker tapes, penalty flags, etc.]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Hartnett and April, before the effective filing date of the invention, in order to allow a given broadcaster and their associated viewers to communicate with one another and send digital gifts [April 0083]. Regarding Claim 7, the combination of Hartnett and April discloses the method wherein displaying a select control for supporting a user in selecting a participant from a plurality of participants comprises: displaying, in response to the user having selected to enter the live streaming channel, the live streaming interface to the user, wherein the live streaming interface comprises a live streaming image display area, a comment display area, and interaction controls, wherein the interaction controls comprise the select control, and further comprise at least one of a comment input control, a gift control, or an emoji control [April Figure 1B]. Regarding Claim 8, the combination of Hartnett and April discloses the method wherein displaying, in response to receiving a user selection for the select control, a plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants comprises: displaying, in response to receiving the user selection for the select control, the plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants in an area of the live streaming interface other than the live streaming image display area [Hartnett Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 9, the combination of Hartnett and April discloses the method, wherein displaying a user input of the user in association with the first participant in a live streaming interface comprises: displaying, in response to receiving a message that is input by the user for the comment input control, an icon of the first participant in association with the message in the comment display area [April Figure 1B]. Regarding Claim 17, Hartnett discloses an electronic device, comprising: a processor [0223]; and a memory coupled to the processor, wherein the memory has instructions stored therein that, when executed by the processor, cause the electronic device to [0361]; display a select control for supporting a user in selecting first participant from a plurality of participants, wherein the plurality of participants are participants associated with a live streaming event in a live streaming channel [0045]; display, in response to receiving a user selection for the select control, a plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants [0107 & Figures 6A& 6B]. Hartnett fails to clearly disclose associating a user account of the user with the first participant and displaying a user input of the user. In an analogous art, April discloses associating a user account of the user [0204] with the first participant in response to receiving a user selection for the first participant among the plurality of participants [0029, 0065 & 0104; user subscribes to the broadcaster]; and displaying a user input of the user in association with the first participant in a live streaming interface [0017; a viewer following a particular broadcaster may purchase digital beers, various digital concession stand items, ticker tapes, penalty flags, etc.]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Hartnett and April, before the effective filing date of the invention, in order to allow a given broadcaster and their associated viewers to communicate with one another and send digital gifts [April 0083]. Regarding Claim 18, Hartnett discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to [0223]: display a select control for supporting a user in selecting a first participant from a plurality of participants, wherein the plurality of participants are participants associated with a live streaming event in a live streaming channel [0045]; display, in response to receiving a user selection for the select control, a plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants [0107 & Figures 6A& 6B]. Hartnett fails to clearly disclose associating a user account of the user with the first participant and displaying a user input of the user. In an analogous art, April discloses associating a user account of the user [0204] with the first participant in response to receiving a user selection for the first participant among the plurality of participants [0029, 0065 & 0104; user subscribes to the broadcaster]; and displaying a user input of the user in association with the first participant in a live streaming interface [0017; a viewer following a particular broadcaster may purchase digital beers, various digital concession stand items, ticker tapes, penalty flags, etc.]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Hartnett and April, before the effective filing date of the invention, in order to allow a given broadcaster and their associated viewers to communicate with one another and send digital gifts [April 0083]. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hartnett et al. US Patent Publication No. 2022/0116435 in view of April et al. US Patent Publication No. 2020/0021892 in further view of Goldman et al. US Patent Publication No. 2012/0115585. Regarding Claim 12, the combination of Hartnett and April fails to clearly disclose updating a resource amount associated with the user account in response to the performance of the first participant in the live streaming event meeting a predetermined condition. In an analogous art, Goldman discloses a method that further comprises: updating a resource amount associated with the user account in response to the performance of the first participant in the live streaming event meeting a predetermined condition [0005-0006 & 0017]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Hartnett, April, and Goldman, before the effective filing date of the invention, in order to provide an interactive social gaming community [Goldman 0007]. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hartnett et al. US Patent Publication No. 2022/0116435 in view of April et al. US Patent Publication No. 2020/0021892 in further view of Morris et al. US Patent Publication No. 2022/0086203. Regarding Claim 13, the combination of Hartnett and April fails to clearly disclose displaying a switch control for supporting the user in reselecting a participant; and displaying, in response to receiving a user selection for the switch control, the plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants. In an analogous art, Morris discloses a method that further comprises: displaying a switch control for supporting the user in reselecting a participant; and displaying, in response to receiving a user selection for the switch control, the plurality of participant icons of the plurality of participants [0060 & Figure 1]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Hartnett, April, and Morris, before the effective filing date of the invention, in order to allow spectating users to follow the stream from the point of view or perspective of the selected active user and may be particularly desirable for multiplayer games or other events with celebrities or star players [Morris 0060]. Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Baron et al. US Patent Publication No. 2009/0063991 - The graphic user avatar also enables the user presence component to support diverse range of applications. The user presence component offers multiple layout options for groups of graphic user avatars. For example, the graphic user avatars may stack into rows, and shrink in size as group size of the participants involved grows. Each graphic user avatar may support a pop-up rollover menu comprising participant name, participant information comprising age, gender, and location, interactive avatar, link to a participant profile, personal ringtone. The graphic user avatar may also comprise moderation controls, for example, "block", "eject", and "make moderator", social networking controls, for example, "add friend" and "gift", and communication controls, for example, "chat" and "message". Bloom et al. US Patent Publication No. 2021/0409787 - A graphical representation of each sub-group may be generated at any suitable time. As a non-limiting example, a graphical representation may include images, video, and/or avatars corresponding to each participant in a sub-group. An avatar can include any suitable icon or figure representing a particular person. Although not depicted in FIG. 1, a graphical representation of a sub-group could include stationary and/or non-stationary avatar representations of each participant in the sub-group. Each avatar may be selected from a number of pre-generated avatars, or at least some of the avatars may be defined by user input provided a corresponding participant. In some embodiments, the avatars may be stationary or animated to some degree. The animation provided may be predetermined and/or according to a predetermined protocol for combining and animating avatars. In some embodiments, a video feed provided by the participant's computing device may be utilized to generate an animation for the avatar. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAHAR A RIAZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3005. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAHAR AQIL RIAZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2424
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764389
METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING A TEXT EFFECT
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764394
METHOD, APPARATUS AND SERVER FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12707132
INTERACTIVE LIVE MEDIA SYSTEMS AND METHODS
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701281
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VIDEO SUGGESTIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695961
METHOD, APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE OF PAGE DISPLAY FOR APPLICATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 1m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 501 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month