Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/131,167

METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PRODUCT FOR RENDERING LIVE VIDEO STREAM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 19, 2025
Priority
Nov 17, 2022 — CN 202211441161.5 +1 more
Examiner
BAROT, BHARAT
Art Unit
2453
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
773 granted / 884 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
913
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§103
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-14 are presented for examination. Notice for all Patent Application as subject to AIA In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability should not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application is currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being un-patentable over Zhu et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0377244 A1) in view of Faulkner et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0388357 A1). As to claim 1, Zhu et al teach a method for rendering a live video stream in a cloud rendering system (see abstract, figures 1-2, par. 0055), comprising: obtaining, at a cloud server of the cloud rendering system, effect identification information and a live video stream corresponding to virtual reality live streaming, the effect identification information being identification information of a target effect for rendering the live video stream, wherein the cloud rendering system comprises the cloud server and a virtual reality device; determining, at the cloud server, a rendering mode corresponding to the target effect based on the effect identification information (figure 2, pars. 0056-0060, 0073-0074, 0083-0084, 0091-0092, 0096-0097, reference teaches that the cloud server obtaining the avatar and the video stream and performing rendering process). However, Zhu et al do not disclose that the rendering mode comprises a first rendering mode and/or a second rendering mode and also do not teach that performing rendering process based on the rendering mode. Faulkner et al teach a method for rendering a live video stream in a cloud rendering system (see abstract, pars. 0003-0004), comprising: the rendering mode comprises a first rendering mode and/or a second rendering mode; in accordance with a determination that the rendering mode is a first rendering mode, performing, at the cloud server, effect algorithm processing based on the live video stream and the effect identification information, performing effect rendering processing based on an identification result corresponding to the effect algorithm processing to obtain a target video stream, and sending the target video stream to the virtual reality device, and obtaining and playing, at the virtual reality device, the target video stream sent from the cloud server; and in accordance with a determination that the rendering mode is a second rendering mode, performing at the cloud server, effect algorithm processing based on the live video stream and the effect identification information and sending the live video stream and an identification result to the virtual reality device, and performing, at the virtual reality device, effect rendering processing based on the live video stream and an algorithm result to obtain a processed target video stream, and playing the processed target video stream (figure 1s, pars. 0027 & 0031, figures 4s, pars. 0041-0042, 0044-0047, 0050-0051, reference teaches that rendering a live video stream in a rendering system and performing rendering process based on the rendering mode). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Faulkner et al as stated above with the method of Zhu et al for performing rendering process based on the rendering mode because it would have provided seamless transition from a VR device to a network device and vice versa during gathering events. As to claim 2, Zhu et al teach that obtaining, at the cloud server, target data for rendering the target effect in a preset configuration platform based on the effect identification information; determining, at the cloud server, a target rendering area corresponding to the target effect based on the target data; and performing, at the cloud server, an identification operation on the live video stream to obtain an identification result corresponding to the live video stream, wherein the identification result comprises key point information corresponding to the target rendering area in a live image frame corresponding to the live video stream and depth data corresponding to the live image frame (figure 3, pars. 0073-0076, obtaining an avatar based on storage path information and performing rendering process). As to claim 3, Zhu et al teach that performing, at the cloud server, a rendering operation on the live video stream based on the identification result and the target data to obtain a rendered video stream; and performing, at the cloud server, an encoding operation on the rendered video stream to obtain the target video stream (figure 4, pars. 0083-0090, obtaining a driven avatar and performing rendering process using RTT technology). As to claim 4, Zhu et al teach that obtaining, at the cloud server, target data for rendering the target effect in a preset configuration platform based on the effect identification information; determining, at the cloud server, a target rendering area corresponding to the target effect based on the target data; performing, at the cloud server, an identification operation on the live video stream to obtain an identification result corresponding to the live video stream, wherein the identification result comprises key point information corresponding to the target rendering area in a live image frame corresponding to a live video stream and depth data corresponding to the live image frame; and performing, at the cloud server, an encoding operation on the live video stream, the identification result and the target data to obtain the target video stream, and sending the target video stream to the virtual reality device (figure 2, pars. 0055-0063, figure 5, pars. 0090-0096, performing rendering process, generating and updating the rendering result, and forwarding to the VR device). As to claim 5, Zhu et al teach that obtaining, at the virtual reality device, the target video stream, and performing a decoding operation on the target video stream to obtain a live video stream corresponding to virtual reality live streaming, target data and an identification result corresponding to the live video stream, wherein the identification result comprises key point information corresponding to the target rendering area in a live image frame corresponding to the live video stream and depth data corresponding to the live image frame; and performing a rendering operation on the live video stream based on the identification result and the target data to obtain a processed target video stream (figure 2, pars. 0055-0063, figure 5, pars. 0090-0096, performing rendering process, and generating and updating the rendering result). As to claims 6-10, they are also rejected for the same reasons set forth to rejecting claims 1-5 above, since claims 6-10 do not teach or define any new limitations than above rejected claims 1-5. As to claims 11-14, they are also rejected for the same reasons set forth to rejecting claims 1-5 above, since claims 11-14 do not teach or define any new limitations than above rejected claims 1-5. Additional Reference The examiner as of general interest cites the following reference. a. Mikhailov et al, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0364215 A1. Content Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bharat Barot whose telephone number is (571)272-3979. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:00AM-3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamal B Divecha can be reached on (571)272-5863. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BHARAT BAROT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2453August 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 19, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737772
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A SERVER PROBE FOR COMPLIANCE DEPLOYMENT CHECKS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739261
CYBER-SECURE DYNAMIC MONITORING AND DECISION SYSTEMS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739281
Network Configuration Protocol Datastore Encryption
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726403
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND CORRESPONDING SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING RESOURCE CONSUMPTION OF ONE OR MORE OPERATIONS OF TRANSACTION AND/OR IDLE TIME WITHIN A CLOUD COMPUTING SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719841
METHOD FOR SECURE NETWORK COMMUNICATION AND SYSTEM THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 8m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month