Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/131,203

MEASURING DEVICE AND MEASURING CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 19, 2025
Priority
Dec 22, 2022 — JP 2022-205124 +1 more
Examiner
ADAMS, GREGORY W
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Taisei Kako Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
1062 granted / 1412 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1446
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1412 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 & 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou (CN 113384466) (English translation attached with copy) in view of Greenwald (US 6,513,679). Interpretative note 1. “Comprising” in claim 1, line 5 has been interpretated as the transitional phrase. The preamble of the claim(s) is not considered a limitation and is of no significance to claim construction. See Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182 F.3d 1298, 1305, 51 USPQ2d 1161, 1165 (Fed. Cir. 1999). (See MPEP 2111.02.) Interpretative note 2. The limitation “a partition part configured to partition an alignment space at a partition position halfway in an extension direction and to be able to change a partition position in an extension direction” is being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. With respect to claims 1, 3 & 5, Zhou discloses- a guide part 2 extending along an opening direction of a container opening part of a container body, a guide part including an alignment space (FIG. 1: stack of pills 6 shown in space) in which a plurality of solid objects 6 discharged through a container opening part from a storage part 7 can be aligned in an extension direction of a guide part; an extendable/retractable partition part 321, 31, 35 configured to partition an alignment space at a partition position halfway (indicated by vertical positions #21 in FIGS 1-5) in an extension direction; and, an openable and closeable outlet part 5, 51 for taking out a plurality of solid objects 6 from an alignment space is provided in a distal end part in an extension direction of a guide Zhou discloses changing position of partition 321 as shown in FIGS. 2 & 3. Zhou also recognizes that different counts may require different partition positions along an extension direction as evidence by multiple grooves 21 along container body 2. Zhou does not disclose or the functional equivalent of a partition part that functions to partition a space AND change position in an extension direction. Greenwald discloses a measuring device comprising a guide part 171 (FIGS. 16a-16d) that includes an alignment space (indicated generally as stack of pills 172 in guide part 171 in FIG. 16a), and a partition part 154, ‘223’ configured to partition an alignment space at a partition position halfway in an extension direction and to be able to change a partition position in an extension direction. (C18/L16-39 describing means by which partition 154, 223 moves.) It is noted that ‘223’ appears to be a typo and should have been referred to as reference character #232 to agree with the figures. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the invention of Zhou to include a partition part able to change a partition position in an extension direction, as taught by Greenwald, which makes counting and subsequent extraction, e.g. dispense, of pills or capsules reduces pill-to-pill rubbing when dispensed. With respect to claim 2, Zhou discloses that a length of guide part 2 in a width direction orthogonal to an extension direction is equal to or less than a length in a width direction of a storage part 7. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 & 6-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY W ADAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-8101. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571)272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY W ADAMS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 19, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767465
TILT HOISTS AND LUMBER UNSTACKING SYSTEMS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759813
ADJUSTABLE TRAY STACKER/DESTACKER ASSEMBLY
1y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753026
SORTING MACHINE FOR SLABS
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752435
GRIPPER ASSEMBLY WITH CONSECUTIVE PRODUCT CARRIERS
1y 12m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753010
CONTAINER UNLOADING APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.8%)
2y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1412 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month