Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/132,129

APPLICATION TOOL AND METHOD FOR APPLYING OUTER PACKAGES DURING THE PRODUCTION OF PACKAGING UNITS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 22, 2025
Priority
Nov 23, 2022 — DE 10 2022 131 020.5 +1 more
Examiner
LEEDS, DANIEL JEREMY
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Krones Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
232 granted / 332 resolved
At TC average
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
375
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 332 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wimmer, US 20240253883. Regarding claim 1, Wimmer discloses: An application device (Fig. 2A, handling tool 56) of a packaging machine for producing packaging units (Fig. 1e, packaging unit 10) which are formed by joining at least one packaging blank (Fig. 1e, packaging blank 14) to a plurality of articles (Fig. 1e, articles 12), comprising: - an application tool (Fig. 2A, handling tool 56) which carries, on its underside, a packaging blank (Fig. 2A, packaging blank 14) which can be placed on a packaging blank and can then place the packaging blank on an upper face of the plurality of articles (see Figs. 2a-2e), wherein the application device can exert a first joining force in a direction parallel to vertical longitudinal center axes of the articles (Fig. 2a, feed direction 68, stroke direction 74) to form first connections, - a punch unit (Figs. 2a-2e, punch unit 72), which is assigned to the application device and can be placed together with the application tool on the plurality of articles, and wherein, after the packaging blank has been placed on the articles, the punch unit presses with a second joining force onto the upper faces of the plurality of articles in order to fully connect the packaging blank to the articles ([0296] “A blade-like folding punch 70 also projects from the lower side of the base plate 58, which provides that the folding region 46 be pressed into the main surface 18 of the packaging blank 14 as soon as the base plate 58 is either placed on the packaging blank 14 or is located at a defined vertical distance B (cf. in this regard FIG. 2D) above the packaging blank 14… [0297] “The folding punch 70, which preferably corresponds to the dimensions and in particular the length of the folding region 46 extending from narrow side to opposite narrow side of the main surface 18 of the packaging blank 14, presses the packaging blank 14 in the provided region— this is the folding region 46— between the rows of three beverage cans 34, which are initially still spaced apart by the horizontal distance A, and thereby activates the primary fixing element 22 (together with the folding of the side surfaces 24) and reduces the horizontal distance A to a value of zero or nearly zero, such that the beverage cans 34 all touch one another linearly at their shell surfaces 26.”). Regarding claim 2, Wimmer further discloses: wherein the application tool (Fig. 2A, handling tool 56) comprises a flat or bowl-like attachment with apertures or recesses (Fig. 2A, base plate 58). Regarding claim 3, Wimmer further discloses: wherein the punch unit can reach through the flat or bowl-like attachment and apply the second joining force to the packaging blank to form second connections ([0296-0297]). Regarding claim 4, Wimmer further discloses: wherein the second joining force applied by the punch unit completes the connection between the packaging blank and the articles ([0296-0297]). Regarding claim 5, Wimmer further discloses: wherein the application tool and the punch unit operate successively to carry out a two-stage joining process ([0296-0297]). Regarding claims 6-14, Wimmer anticipates the device of claims 1-5. Therefore, under MPEP 2112.02, Process Claims [R-07.2015], the method of claims 6-14 are also anticipated, and therefore rejected. “Under the principles of inherency, if a prior art device, in its normal and usual operation, would necessarily perform the method claimed, then the method claimed will be considered to be anticipated by the prior art device. When the prior art device is the same as a device described in the specification for carrying out the claimed method, it can be assumed the device will inherently perform the claimed process. In re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 231 USPQ 136 (Fed. Cir. 1986)”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL JEREMY LEEDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2095. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs, 0730-1730. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at 571-270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL JEREMY LEEDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747054
BAG OPENING VERIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A BAGGING MACHINE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746646
POWER TOOL
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734714
SUCKING APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735214
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OXYGEN FREE PACKAGING
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12715101
USER INTERFACE CONSTRUCTION AND MOUNTING FOR IMPACTING FASTENING TOOLS
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.7%)
3y 0m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 332 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month