Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/134,506

CONTROL VALVE FOR HEAT TREATMENT CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 30, 2025
Priority
Dec 01, 2022 — FR 2212615 +1 more
Examiner
WILLIAMS, PATRICK C
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
415 granted / 517 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 517 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by applicant’s cited Kubricky et al (US 11231118). Regarding claim 1, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “A control valve for a fluid circulation for a heat treatment circuit of a vehicle (column 3 lines 27-37), comprising; a first connection element (400, 500); a second connection element (200, 300) which mechanically interacts with the first connection element (via 600), the first connection element and the second connection element both defining an internal volume (tandem interior, further defined by 200 and 400); and a conduit (assembly of 200, 400) which is formed by the internal volume of the first connection element and by the internal volume of the second connection element and a control device (FIG 1) which is at least partially integrated within the conduit (see FIG 3a).” Regarding claim 2, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the control device is integrally arranged within the conduit (assembly in FIG 3a seen as “integrally”).” Regarding claim 3, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the control device comprises a piston/spring assembly (3, 4) which is configured to block one direction of circulation of the fluid which circulates in the conduit (would block leftward flow direction).” Regarding claim 4, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the first connection element and the second connection element comprise fixing means (600), the fixing means ensuring positioning of the internal volumes of the first connection element and the second connection element opposite each other (FIG 3A).” Regarding claim 5, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the first connection element and the second connection element comprise an internal wall (inner wall of 200) which at least partially defines the internal volume, the control device comprising an external wall (outer wall at 7, 9) which is arranged opposite at least one of the internal walls of the first connection element or the second connection element (see FIG 3A).” Regarding claim 6, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the control device comprises at least one sealing member (5) which extends along the external wall (see FIG 3A), the sealing member being in direct contact with the internal wall of at least the first connection element or the second connection element (see FIG 3A).” Regarding claim 8, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the first connection element (400) comprises an end piece (440, 240 and end section to the left of 440) which is capable of being inserted within the internal volume of the second connection element by form-fitting connection (connection in FIG 3A seen as “form-fitting”).” Regarding claim 9, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the end piece comprises an external surface (outer wall of left end section) which is arranged opposite the internal wall of the second connection element (sleeved by inner wall of right end of 200), the end piece comprising at least one sealing element (240) which extends along the external surface (see FIG 3A), the sealing element being in direct contact with the internal wall of the second connection element (240 sleeved by inner wall at 240).” Regarding claim 10, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the control device is engaged between the second connection element and the end piece (axially between the end piece and 205 of the second connection element).” Regarding claim 11, Kubricky (FIGs 1-3b) discloses “wherein the first connection element and/or the second connection element comprise(s) at least a conduit portion (left end of 200 or right end of 400) which is configured to mechanically and fluidically connect the control valve to the heat treatment circuit (valve is part of heat treatment system in Column 3 lines 27-37).” Claim(s) 1-2, 4, and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ligeti (US 10385983). Regarding claim 1, Ligeti (FIGs 1-6) discloses “A control valve (FIG 6) for a fluid circulation for a heat treatment circuit of a vehicle (seen as intended use) , comprising; a first connection element (41, 17); a second connection element (16, 18) which mechanically interacts with the first connection element (via 180), the first connection element and the second connection element both defining an internal volume (tandem interior); and a conduit (41, 18, 20) which is formed by the internal volume of the first connection element and by the internal volume of the second connection element and a control device (20) which is at least partially integrated within the conduit (see FIG 6).” Regarding claim 2, Ligeti (FIGs 1-6) discloses “wherein the control device is integrally arranged within the conduit (assembly in FIG 6 seen as “integrally”).” Regarding claim 4, Ligeti (FIGs 1-6) discloses “wherein the first connection element and the second connection element comprise fixing means (180), the fixing means ensuring positioning of the internal volumes of the first connection element and the second connection element opposite each other (FIG 6).” Regarding claim 7, Ligeti (FIGs 1-6) discloses “wherein the control device comprises two fluidic connectors (24, 22), each of the fluidic connectors being capable of being inserted within each of the internal volumes of each of the connection elements (see FIG 6) by form-fitting (threads and sleeving seen as “form-fitting” as they have matching shapes).” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Devices similar to the application are disclosed by Walls (US 2870784), Ho (US 20160169397), Scaramucci (US 3442288), Gold (US 3749122), and McConnell et al (US 5117861). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK C WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)431-0767. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK C WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673401
Device For Supporting And Holding The Gate of A Wedge Valve During A Maintenance Operation
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663166
HOT WATER CIRCULATION DEVICE AND HOT WATER DEVICE MONITORING SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663085
CONTROLE PLATE FOR A HIGH CONDUCTANCE VALVE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653378
UTILIZATION INDICATORS FOR SINGLE-USE VALVES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644528
COOLING MEDIUM DISTRIBUTION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.4%)
2y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 517 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month