Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/135,141

REDUCTION GEAR FOR A POWERTRAIN

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Priority
Dec 23, 2022 — FR FR2214475 +1 more
Examiner
RIEGELMAN, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
764 granted / 977 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species 1 in the reply filed on 7/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13, 15-16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Knoblauch et al., WO2006/122649. PNG media_image1.png 474 303 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 782 522 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Knoblauch et al. discloses a speed reducer for a powertrain (see fig 1), comprising: a reduction device (fig 1) comprising a first toothed wheel (116) able to be rotated about a first axis of rotation (about 48), the first toothed wheel (116) comprising an annular groove (118) located about the first axis of rotation (as described above) on a flank (see fig 4) of the first toothed wheel (116), a deflector (128) comprising a ramp (inner portion of 128 – see fig 4) for guiding a lubricant (oil conducting), a portion of the ramp (as described above) being located inside the annular groove (118) of the first toothed wheel (116). Regarding claim 2, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ramp (as described above) comprises a main guideway (region that catches fluid flow shown as non-cutout region in fig 4) and an axial protrusion (angled cutout region in fig 4 which conducts lubricant in the axial direction) extending the main guideway (as described above) and projecting axially (to the right in fig 4) from the main guideway (as described above), the axial protrusion (as described above) being arranged partly (see fig 4-5) the annular groove (118) of the first toothed wheel (116). Regarding claim 3, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 2, wherein the reduction device (see fig 1) comprises a second toothed wheel (wheel supporting 56) able to be rotated about a second axis of rotation (about 20) parallel (see fig 1) to the first axis of rotation (as described above), the second toothed wheel (as described above) comprising a toothed peripheral band (teeth on outer circumference of 56) arranged radially, with respect to this second axis (as described above), facing the main guideway (as described above) of the ramp (as described above). Regarding claim 4, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 3, wherein the diameter of the second toothed wheel (as described above) is greater (see fig 1) than the diameter of the first toothed wheel (116), and the first axis of rotation (about 48) is arranged, when the reducer is in a position corresponding to that adopted when mounted on a vehicle parked horizontally (see fig 1), above the second axis (as described above). Regarding claim 5, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 3, wherein the first toothed wheel (116) and the second toothed wheel (wheel of 56) are offset axially (right to left in fig 1) relative to one another. Regarding claim 6, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 3, wherein the second toothed wheel (wheel of 56) is a drive wheel (see fig 1) of a differential-drive device (18). Regarding claim 7, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 3, wherein the toothset (as described above) of the second toothed wheel (as described above) is inclined (known from 134 in fig 5), the inclination of the toothset (see fig 1,5) being such that the lubricant is directed axially to the same side as the first toothed wheel (116). Regarding claim 8, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 3, wherein the reduction device (as described above0 comprises a third toothed wheel (connected with 52) made to rotate about the first axis (about 48) of and meshing with the second toothed wheel (wheel of 56), the second toothed wheel (as described above) and the third toothed wheel (as described above) being arranged in the same plane (see fig 1), the third toothed wheel (as described above) being arranged beyond (see fig 1, 4-5) an upper end (top of 128) of the ramp (as described above)of the deflector (128). Regarding claim 9, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 2, wherein the deflector (128) comprises a shield (24) arranged to at least one side (see fig 4) of the main guideway (as described above) of the ramp (as described above) so as to prevent the lubricant from dropping off that side of the ramp (as described above). Regarding claim 10, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 9, wherein the shield (24) is situated on the same side of the main guideway (as described above) of the ramp (as described above) as the first toothed wheel (116). Regarding claim 11, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 2, wherein, when viewed in the plane of the axial protrusion (see fig 4), the annular groove (as described above) has a cross section of a shape (see fig 4) that complements the edge of the axial protrusion (as described above). Regarding claim 12, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reducer (as described above) comprises a housing (24) enclosing the reduction device (as described above), the deflector (128) being manufactured as a component distinct (see connection means shown in fig 2) from the housing (60). Regarding claim 13, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 12, wherein the deflector (128) comprises a mounting portion (right side of 128 in fig 4 which is fixed to 24) comprising a plurality of fixing elements (shown as line with x on left end in fig 4) cooperating with complementary fixing elements (hole in 24) arranged in the housing (24) of the reducer. Regarding claim 15, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 13, wherein the fixing elements (as described above) are mounting studs (see line with x at end shown in fig 4) and the complementary fixing elements (hole on 24) belonging to the housing (24) are mounting receptacles. Regarding claim 16, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 12, wherein the reducer (as described above) comprises a first shaft (48) on which is mounted the first toothed wheel (116), and a first bearing (88) arranged to guide the rotation, about the first axis of rotation (about 48), of the first shaft (48), the first bearing (88) being mounted in a first receptacle (right side of 24 shown in fig 1) of the housing (24), and wherein an end region of the ramp (as described above) of the deflector (128) is arranged: axially along the first axis of rotation (about 48), between the first toothed wheel (116) and the first bearing (88), radially with respect to the first axis of rotation (as described above), closer to the axis of rotation (about 48) than the radially external periphery of the first bearing (88), radially closer to the axis of rotation (about 48) than the radially external periphery of the first toothed wheel (116). Regarding claim 18, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first toothed wheel (116) comprises a hub (central region shown in fig 4), a toothed peripheral band (shown in fig 5) arranged radially to the outside of the hub (as described above), and a wheel disk (see central radial protruding region of 116 in fig 4) connecting the hub (as described above) and the toothed peripheral band (as described above), the annular groove (118) being delimited on one side of the first toothed wheel (right side in fig 4) by the hub (as described above), the wheel disk (as described above) and the toothed peripheral band (as described above). Regarding claim 19, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 4, wherein the first toothed wheel (116) and the second toothed wheel (as described above) are offset axially relative to one another (see fig 1). Regarding claim 20, Knoblauch et al. discloses the speed reducer as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second toothed wheel (as described above) is a drive wheel of a differential-drive device (18). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 14 is patentable over the prior art of record because the teachings of the references taken as a whole do not show or render obvious the combination set forth in claim 14, including every structural element recited in the claims, especially, the configuration wherein the housing of the reducer comprises a first part and a second part, these being assembled with one another, enclosing the reduction device, the fixing elements are arranged in such a way that at least one fixing element is fixed to the first part of the housing and at least one fixing element is fixed to the second part of the housing. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest the elements of the lubrication system as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Claim 17 is patentable over the prior art of record because the teachings of the references taken as a whole do not show or render obvious the combination set forth in claim 17, including every structural element recited in the claims, especially, the configuration wherein the reduction device comprises a first shaft on which is mounted the first toothed wheel, an input shaft parallel to the first shaft and a first double reduction stage comprising: on the one hand, for a first gear ratio, a first pinion coaxial with and unable to rotate independently of the input shaft and a fourth toothed wheel meshing with the first pinion and able to cause the first shaft to rotate about the first axis of rotation; and on the other hand, for a second gear ratio, a second pinion coaxial with and unable to rotate independently of the input shaft and the first toothed wheel meshing with the second pinion and able to cause the first shaft to rotate about the first axis of rotation, the reduction device comprising a ratio-selection device able to secure to the first shaft such that it cannot rotate independently thereof, either the first toothed wheel or the fourth toothed wheel. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest the elements of the lubrication system as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7956. The examiner can normally be reached 8-6 EST Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Hodge can be reached at (571) 272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL A. RIEGELMAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3654 /MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748236
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A DISPENSING EVENT IN A BULK PRODUCT DISPENSING SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747136
Hoistway Mechanics of Panoramic Vacuum Elevator
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742477
LUBRICATION RING FOR TRANSPORTING LUBRICANT
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729095
SUSPENSION DEVICE AND USE THEREOF IN AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM, AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729097
ROPE AND ELEVATOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month