Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/136,014

GEL ELECTROPHORESIS DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 05, 2025
Priority
Dec 07, 2022 — JP 2022-195922 +1 more
Examiner
KAUR, GURPREET
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Bioseeds Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
519 granted / 794 resolved
At TC average
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
826
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims 1. Claims 1-3 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 2. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the case" in lines 3 and 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zimmermann et al. (US 2007/0007140). Claim 1. Zimmermann et al. teach a gel electrophoresis device (100) comprising a gel cassette (insert element 200 for performing gel electrophoresis analysis;[0071] [0075], a seat (first insert element reception 101; [0071], a maintenance portion (contacts 1400; [0135]), a first electrode and a second electrode, 201 [0076], wherein: the gel cassette is provided with an insulating case and a gel held by the case (insert element 200 is made up plastic material and comprises gel strips 500; [0085][0086]); the gel is provided with a first connection area, a second connection area and a sample set area (gel strips is provided with first contact 501 and second contact 502 and comprises analytes; [0088] and Fig 5); the first connection area, the second connection area and the sample set area are exposed from the case (first contact 501 and second contact 502 and analytes are exposed in the insert element 200; see Fig 5); in a predetermined direction, the sample set area is located between the first connection area and the second connection area (analyte to be electrophoresed between the first contact 501 and second contact 502 with application of current; [0088]); in the predetermined direction, the sample set area is adjacent to the first connection area and apart from the second connection area (analyte to be electrophoresed between the first contact 501 and second contact 502 with application of current; [0088]); the gel cassette has a predetermined thickness at a position corresponding to each of the first connection area and the second connection area (insert element 200 has thickness; see Fig 2); the gel cassette is mountable on the seat (insert element 200 is slided into the first insert element reception 101; see Fig 3); the maintenance portion (contacts 1400) is combinable with and fixable to the seat and separable from the seat (contacts 1400 is combinable with and fixable to the rails of the first insert element reception 101 and separable when insert element is removed [0135] and Fig 14); both the first electrode and the second electrode are provided to one of the maintenance portion and the seat (electrodes 201 are connected to contacts 1400; see Fig 14); a remaining one of the maintenance portion and the seat is provided with a first facing portion and a second facing portion which correspond to the first electrode and the second electrode, respectively (first insert element reception 101 is comprised of corresponding contacts 107, 108 (strip like contact) to the electrodes 201; see Fig 2 and [0135]); in a non-mounted state that the maintenance portion is fixed to the seat without mounting the gel cassette on the seat, the first electrode and the second electrode face a first facing portion and a second facing portion, respectively, in an up-down direction perpendicular to the predetermined direction and are separable from a predetermined distance or less (contacts 1400 are fixed to the first insert element reception 101 without inserting the gel, the electrodes 201 face the contacts 107, 108 (strip like contact) in an up-down direction perpendicular to the predetermined direction of analyte migration and are separable from a predetermined distance; [0109]); a size of the predetermined distance is smaller than a size of the predetermined thickness (since the length of the electrodes in the up-down direction face the gel cassette, thus it is apparent the size of distance between the electrode and thickness of the gel cassette is smaller than the predetermined thickness of the gel cassette); and in a state that the first electrode and the second electrode are directly brought into contact with the first connection area and the second connection area, respectively, and that the gel cassette is mounted on the seat and the maintenance portion is fixed to the seat, the first electrode and the second electrode press the first connection area and the second connection area directly in the up-down direction (electrodes 201 press down into the first contact 501 and second contact 502 when the assembly is electrophoresis mode; [0088]). Claim 3. Zimmermann et al. teach the gel electrophoresis device further comprises a pressing mechanism; and in a mounted state that the gel cassette is mounted on the seat, the pressing mechanism presses one of the first electrode and the first connection area toward a remaining one of the first electrode and the first connection area and presses one of the second electrode and the second connection area toward a remaining one of the second electrode and the second connection area (electrodes 201 are pressed against the first contact 501 and the second contact 502 via magnetic force [0088][0109]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zimmermann et al.(US 2007/0007140). Claim 2. Zimmermann et al. teach gel of the gel cassette inherently having thickness at each of the first contact 501 and second contact 502; see Fig 5 and in a mounted state that the gel cassette is mounted on the seat, the first connection area and the second connection area are pressed by the first electrode and the second electrode, respectively (the insert element 200 is mounted on the first insert element reception 101, the first contact 501 and second contact 502 are pressed into the electrodes 201/203 respectively; see [0088][0109]). Zimmermann et al. do not teach the gel of the gel cassette has a thickness of 0.5 mm or more and 3.0 mm or less at each of the first connection area and the second connection area and comprised of polyacrylamide gel and the first electrode and the second electrode displaced by 0.1 mm or more. However, it is well known in the art, gel for electrophoresis is made up of polyacrylamide and could be made up of different thickness depending on the depth of receptions 401 [0082] and since electrodes make connection with gel [0088], thus the electrodes could be displaced at claimed distance to make contact with gel. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GURPREET KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-7895. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GURPREET KAUR/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768810
ENHANCED CHLORIDE SELECTIVE MEMBRANE
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768811
GAS SENSOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761183
MICROBIAL CONCENTRATION DETECTION ELEMENT IN UNKNOWN SOLUTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754164
SINGLE MOLECULE NANOPARTICLE NANOWIRE FOR MOLECULAR ELECTRONIC SENSING
4y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753427
ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSOR, OR SENSING MEMBRANE FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSOR CONTAINING TRANSITION METAL COMPLEX OR OXIDATION-REDUCTION POLYMER
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.5%)
3y 5m (~2y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month