Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/139,120

METHOD FOR MANAGING POWER TRANSITIONS BETWEEN A GENERATION MODE AND AN ASSISTANCE MODE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Examiner
OLYNICK, DAVID
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
SAFRAN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
177 granted / 226 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
246
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 226 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Objections Claims 1, 2, 3 and 5 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 in line 13 includes “the remaining.” It is believed to be in error for - - a remaining. - - Claim 1 in line 14 includes “the injected.” It is believed to be in error for - - an injected. - - Claim 2 in lines 3-4 includes “the dynamic.” It is believed to be in error for - - a dynamic. - - Claim 3 in line 13 includes “the remaining.” It is believed to be in error for - - a remaining. - - Claim 3 in line 14 includes “the injected.” It is believed to be in error for - - an injected. - - Claim 5 in line 3 includes “the dynamic.” It is believed to be in error for - - a dynamic. - - Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 4 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dalal (US 2018 / 0216526). Regarding claim 1, Dalal teaches a method (Fig. 4) for managing the power transitions between a generation mode 402 and an assistance mode (406 power assist mode) in a turbomachine 204 having a high-pressure shaft 206 driving a high-pressure electric machine 212 and from which a high-pressure power (HP) is taken off (¶20, ¶25) and a low-pressure shaft 208 driving a low- pressure electric machine 222 and from which a low-pressure power is taken off (¶20,¶25), the generation mode corresponding to a predetermined sharing of power between the high-pressure power and the low-pressure power (¶20) and the assistance mode corresponding to a request for injection of an additional power into the high-pressure shaft or the low-pressure shaft (404, 406, power adjustment event leads to power assist operation, ¶18, ¶25), wherein to reach the requested additional power, when the high- or low-pressure power takeoff is interrupted (¶4, transition from power take-off to power assist is an interruption in the power takeoff) and the high- or low-pressure electric machine respectively driving the high- or low-pressure shaft whose takeoff is interrupted enters motor mode (406 power assist mode), the remaining taken-off power from the high- or low-pressure shaft in generator mode is adjusted based on the injected high- or low-pressure power coming from the high- or low-pressure electric machine that has entered motor mode (¶20, During power assist operation , the low pressure spool generator system can have enough capacity (in overload condition, e.g., 150% for 5 minute or 200% for 5 seconds) to carry all its own bus loads , bus loads (all essential plus all or some non-essential loads ) of the high pressure spool, and also provide power for the power assist operation. Power can be managed to remain within high pressure spool and low pressure spool horsepower extraction ratings. ¶21, When the power assist operation is limited to a few seconds , the low pressure spool generator system can be capable of providing this power as an overload condition. Power generator systems can be rated for 150% loads (5 min operation) and 200% loads (5 sec operation )). Regarding claim 3, Dalal teaches a turbomachine 204 having a high-pressure shaft 206 from which a high-pressure power (HP) is taken off (¶20, ¶25) and a low-pressure shaft 208 from which a low-pressure power is taken off (¶20, ¶25), a control module 600 receiving power setpoints from an ECU (¶25, ¶47, ¶48, ¶54) and power converters (214, 224) associated with high- and low-pressure electric machines (212, 222) respectively mounted on the high- and low-pressure shafts (Fig. 2), a generation mode corresponding to a predetermined sharing of power between the high-pressure power and the low-pressure power (402) and an assistance mode corresponding to the injection of an additional power into the high-pressure shaft or the low-pressure shaft (406), wherein to reach the requested additional power, the control module is configured so that, when the takeoff of high- or low-pressure power is interrupted and the high- or low- pressure electric machine respectively driving the high- or low-pressure shaft whose takeoff is interrupted enters motor mode, the remaining taken-off power from the high- or low-pressure shaft in generator mode is adjusted based on the injected high- or low- pressure power coming from the high- or low-pressure electric machine that has entered motor mode (¶20, During power assist operation, the low pressure spool generator system can have enough capacity (in overload condition, e.g., 150% for 5 minute or 200% for 5 seconds) to carry all its own bus loads , bus loads (all essential plus all or some non-essential loads) of the high pressure spool, and also provide power for the power assist operation. Power can be managed to remain within high pressure spool and low pressure spool horsepower extraction ratings. ¶21, When the power assist operation is limited to a few seconds , the low pressure spool generator system can be capable of providing this power as an overload condition. Power generator systems can be rated for 150% loads (5 min operation) and 200% loads (5 sec operation )). Regarding claim 4, Dalal teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Dalal further teaches the control module further comprises assistance modules configured to add the injected high- or low-pressure power to the remaining taken-off high- or low- pressure power and a selecting module configured to select the taken-off powers coming from the assistance modules (Fig. 3, ¶34-¶36, discusses how main line contactors 316 and 326 and core assist contactor 328 and a bus tie contactor 330 provide assistance modules and selecting modules to route power between the various operations). Regarding claim 9, Dalal teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Dalal further teaches an aeronautical turbomachine such as a hybrid turbofan, a hybrid turboprop or a hybrid helicopter turbomachine (¶22, turbofan and helicopters are described. As engines can receive power from a battery they are hybrids, ¶20.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID OLYNICK whose telephone number is (571)272-2355. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30 am-5 pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phuttiwat Wongwian can be reached at (571) 270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID P. OLYNICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590561
COMBUSTOR WITH LEAN OPENINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571326
MOBILE ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560324
COMBUSTION SECTION WITH A PRIMARY COMBUSTOR AND A SET OF SECONDARY COMBUSTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553609
INTERCOOLED COMBUSTOR NOZZLE GUIDE VANE AND SECONDARY AIR CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12523200
MICRO SCALABLE THRUSTERS FOR ADAPTIVE MISSION PROFILES IN SPACE - USTAMPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 226 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month