Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/139,658

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BALANCING AN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM USING METHANOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 16, 2025
Priority
Dec 22, 2022 — DK PA202201195 +1 more
Examiner
GANNON, LEVI
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Topsoe A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1239 granted / 1498 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.6%
+24.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1498 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dodd et al. (US 2002/0025457; “Dodd”). Regarding claim 1, Dodd teaches a power balancing system (figures 1 and 2), said system comprising: a water-rich feed (1), optionally, an external CO₂ feed (from 17), a supply of renewable electricity (sunlight on PV panels), a first electrolysis unit (4), a methanol synthesis plant (10), a methanol storage unit (between lines 13 and 21; para. [0067]-[0068]), and a CO₂ storage section (15/20), wherein, the first electrolysis unit (4) is arranged to receive the water-rich feed (1) and at least a first portion (power in) of said supply of renewable electricity (from PV panels), and to output a first hydrogen rich stream (through storage 9); the methanol synthesis plant (10) is arranged to receive at least a portion of the first hydrogen rich stream (from 9), and a CO₂ stream (from 20) from the CO₂ storage section (15/20) and/or the external CO₂ feed (17), and to output a first methanol-rich stream (11); the methanol storage unit (between 13 and 21) is arranged to receive and store at least a portion of the first methanol-rich stream (11); and output a second methanol-rich stream (at 21); and wherein, the system (figures 1 and 2) is arranged to generate electrical power from said second methanol-rich stream (at 22), via one or more of the following: wherein the system comprises a methanol fuel cell (22), the methanol fuel cell (22) being arranged to receive at least a first portion (at 21) of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit (connected at 13 and 21) and to output a first electrical power stream (power out); wherein the system comprises a methanol cracker, a first CO₂ removal section, and a first power generation section, the methanol cracker being arranged to receive at least a second portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit and to output a combined H₂ and CO₂ stream; the first CO₂ removal section being arranged to receive at least a portion of the combined H₂ and CO₂ stream and to output a first CO₂-rich stream and a second hydrogen rich stream; the first power generation section being arranged to receive at least a portion of the second hydrogen rich stream from the CO₂ removal section and combust it so as to output a second electrical power stream; wherein the system comprises a methanol cracker, a first CO₂ removal section, and a hydrogen fuel cell, the methanol cracker being arranged to receive at least a second portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit and to output a combined H₂ and CO₂ stream; the first CO₂ removal section being arranged to receive at least a portion of the combined H₂ and CO₂ stream and to output a first CO₂-rich stream and a second hydrogen rich stream; the hydrogen fuel cell being arranged to receive at least a portion of the second hydrogen rich stream from the CO₂ removal section and to output a third electrical power stream; wherein the system further comprises a second power generation section, and a second CO₂ removal section, the second power generation section being arranged to receive at least a third portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit and combust it so as to output a fourth electrical power stream and a flue gas stream, the second CO₂ removal section being arranged to receive the flue gas stream from the second power generation section and output a second CO2-rich stream and a balance stream; or wherein system further comprises a methanol dehydration section, and a diesel generator, said methanol dehydration section being arranged to receive at least a fourth portion of the second methanol rich stream from the methanol storage unit and dehydrate it to provide a dimethyl ether (DME) stream; and wherein said diesel generator is arranged to receive at least a portion of said dimethyl ether (DME) stream and combust it so as to output a fifth electrical power stream; and wherein at least one of the first (POWER OUT), second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams are arranged to be fed to a power grid (para. [0079]). As for claim 2, Dodd teaches wherein the first, second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams are arranged to increase in response to a drop in the supply of renewable electricity (Stored methanol is used when sunlight is scarce, e.g. at night. Para. [0076] and [0079].). Regarding claim 3, Dodd teaches wherein an increase in the first (POWER OUT), second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams is provided by increased output of the second methanol-rich stream from said methanol storage unit (Increased use of stored methanol increases power generated from the stored methanol.). Regarding claim 5, Dodd teaches wherein the methanol fuel cell (22) also outputs a water-rich stream (24). As for claim 7, Dodd teaches wherein the methanol fuel cell (22) also outputs a third CO2-rich stream (23). Regarding claim 8, Dodd teaches wherein the CO₂ storage section (15/20) is further arranged to receive at least a portion of the first CO₂-rich stream, at least a portion of the second CO₂-rich stream, and/or at least a portion of the third CO₂-rich stream (See various CO₂-rich streams input to CO₂ storage device 20). As for claim 10, Dodd teaches wherein the external CO₂ feed is a biogas feed, or a CO₂ from a flue gas (para. [0015]). Regarding claim 13, Dodd teaches a process (figures 1 and 2) for balancing electrical power in the power balancing system according to claim 1, said process comprising the steps of: providing the system (figure 1), feeding the water-rich feed (1) and at least a first portion of said supply of renewable electricity (solar) to the first electrolysis unit (4) and outputting a first hydrogen rich stream (through 9); feeding at least a portion of the first hydrogen rich stream (through 9), and a CO₂ stream (from 20) from the CO₂ storage section (15/20) and/or the external CO₂ feed (17) to the methanol synthesis plant (10) and outputting a first methanol-rich stream (11); feeding at least a portion of the first methanol-rich stream (11); the methanol storage unit and outputting - on demand - a second methanol-rich stream (21); and wherein, the process further comprises one or more steps of: feeding at least a first portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit to the methanol fuel cell (22), and outputting a first electrical power stream (POWER OUT); feeding at least a second portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit to the methanol cracker, and outputting a combined H₂ and CO₂ stream; and feeding at least a portion of the combined H₂ and CO₂ stream to a first CO₂ removal section, and outputting a first CO2-rich stream and a second hydrogen rich stream; and feeding at least a portion of the second hydrogen rich stream from the CO₂ removal section to the first power generation section and combusting it so as to output a second electrical power stream; feeding at least a second portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit to the methanol cracker, and outputting a combined H₂ and CO₂ stream; and feeding at least a portion of the combined H₂ and CO₂ stream to a first CO₂ removal section, and outputting a first CO2-rich stream and a second hydrogen rich stream; and feeding at least a portion of the second hydrogen rich stream from the CO₂ removal section to the hydrogen fuel cell and outputting a third electrical power stream; feeding at least a third portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit to the second power generation section and combusting it so as to output a fourth electrical power stream and a flue gas stream, and feeding the flue gas stream from the second power generation section to the second CO2 removal section and outputting a second CO2-rich stream and a balance stream; feeding at least a fourth portion of the second methanol-rich stream from the methanol storage unit to the methanol dehydration section and dehydrating it to provide a dimethyl ether (DME) stream; and feeding at least a portion of the DME stream to the diesel generator and combusting it so as to output a fifth electrical power stream; followed by a step of feeding at least one of the first (POWER OUT), second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams to a power grid (para. [0079]). As for claim 14, Dodd teaches said process comprising a step of increasing the first, second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams in response to a drop in the supply of renewable electricity (Stored methanol is used when sunlight is scarce, e.g. at night. Para. [0076] and [0079].). Regarding claim 15, Dodd teaches wherein an increase in the first (POWER OUT), second, third, fourth or fifth electrical power streams is provided by increased output of the second methanol-rich stream from said methanol storage unit (Increased use of stored methanol increases power generated from the stored methanol.). Regarding claim 16, Dodd teaches wherein the methanol fuel cell (22) is also arranged to output a third CO2-rich stream (23), said process comprising the further steps of feeding at least a portion of the first CO2-rich stream, at least a portion of the second CO2-rich stream, and/or at least a portion of the third CO2-rich stream to the CO₂ storage section (See various CO₂-rich streams input to CO₂ storage device 20). Regarding claim 17, Dodd teaches wherein the methanol fuel is also arranged to output a water-rich stream (24), said process comprising the further steps of feeding at least a portion of the water-rich stream (24) as feed to the first electrolysis unit (4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dodd in view of Deckman et al. (US 2005/0109037; “Deckman”). As for claim 4, Dodd teaches the system according to claim 1, as detailed above, but fails to teach wherein the first power generation section comprises a combustion section arranged to combust the second hydrogen rich stream and a turbine, arranged to convert heat from the combustion section into electrical power. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to generate electricity from combusted hydrogen. For example, see para. [0008] of Deckman. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to generate electricity in the system of Dodd with a power generating section that combusts hydrogen because such a modification would have been exercising a well-known hydrogen-based power generation technique. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dodd in view of O’Connor et al. (US 2014/0057139; “O’Connor”). As for claim 6, Dodd teaches the system according to claim 1, as detailed above, but fails to teach a methanol dehydration section being arranged to output a water stream, and wherein at least a portion of said water stream is arranged to be fed to the first electrolysis unit. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to generate electricity from dimethylether (DME) which produces water as a byproduct. For example, see para. [0049]-[0050] of O’Connor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to generate electricity in the system of Dodd with a power generating section using dimethylether producing water as a byproduct because such a modification would have been exercising a well-known methanol-based power generation technique. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dodd in view of Raisz et al. (US 2014/0345293; “Raisz”). Regarding claim 9, Dodd teaches the system according to claim 1, as detailed above, but fails to teach a heat integration system, said heat integration system arranged to receive heat energy from the methanol synthesis plant, the first power generation section, the methanol fuel cell, and/or the second power generation section, and to provide heat energy to the methanol cracker, the first CO₂ removal section and/or the second CO₂ removal section. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to recycle heat generated in a methanol synthesis process in a methanol-based power generation system. For example, see para. [0020]-[0025] of Raisz. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use recycled heat generated in the methanol synthesis process of Dodd to power elements in the system of Dodd because such a modification would have been exercising a well-known methanol-based power recycling technique. Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dodd. As for claim 11, Dodd teaches the system according to claim 1, as detailed above, but fails to teach a power regulating section, arranged between the supply of renewable energy and the first electrolysis unit. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to regulate renewable power to generate a stable power output. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add a power regulator to the system of Dodd because such a modification would have provided the well-known benefit of generating a stable electrical power output from the system of Dodd. Regarding claim 12, Dodd teaches a third CO₂ removal section being arranged to receive a flue gas stream and output a fourth CO₂-rich stream, and optionally to feed said fourth CO₂-rich stream to said CO₂ storage section (See CO₂ storage device 20 in figure 1 and the use of flue gases for CO₂ supply means in para. [0015] of Dodd.), but fails to teach the flue gas being generated from a diesel generator. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to utilize a diesel generator as a flue gas CO₂ supply means. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize a diesel generator as the flue gas CO₂ supply means of Dodd because such a modification would have been exercising a well-known CO₂ supply means. Conclusion The prior art reference made of record (Knop et al. US 2013/0214542; figure 1) and not relied upon teaches methanol-based power generation, comprising: a water feed, a CO₂ feed, renewable electricity, an electrolysis unit, methanol synthesis, methanol storage, CO₂ storage, flue gas, and electricity generation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEVI GANNON whose telephone number is (571)272-7971. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEVI GANNON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836 June 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685024
PIEZOELECTRIC STACK, PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PIEZOELECTRIC STACK
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683573
VIBRATOR DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683406
MULTI-THROW OR MULTI-POLE SWITCHING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING MODULAR SWITCHING COMBINATIONS FOR ENABLING FLEXIBLE HOME ENERGY MANAGEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674503
MECHANICAL RENEWABLE GREEN ENERGY PRODUCTION
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671397
SEMICONDUCTOR BURN-IN MACHINE POWER REGULATOR HAVING MULTIPLE POWER MODES
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 0m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1498 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month