Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/144,109

MEDICAL CAP, MEDICAL CONTAINER, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MEDICAL CAP

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Priority
Dec 28, 2022 — JP 2022-212538 +1 more
Examiner
SMALLEY, JAMES N
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
945 granted / 1337 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -10% lift
Without
With
+-9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1382
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1337 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-3 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 7,097,057 (Classens). Regarding claim 1, medical cap which closes an opening through which a liquid passes, the medical cap comprising: a stopper (3) which is arranged inside a tubular mouth portion that forms the opening; and a case (2) including a tubular inner wall (11, 14, and 18) which is arranged between the stopper and the mouth portion, a tubular outer wall (5) which surrounds the inner wall via a tubular space that houses the mouth portion and an upper wall (4) which is arranged above the mouth portion that is arranged at the tubular space, wherein the stopper includes an internal portion (17) which is surrounded by the inner wall and a lower portion (20) which is arranged between the upper wall and the mouth portion that is arranged at the tubular space. Regarding claim 2, the lower portion is arranged between the mouth portion and the upper wall in a state of being in contact with both of the upper wall and the mouth portion that is arranged at the tubular space (see 20 in Fig. 8). Regarding claim 3, the stopper includes a lower end portion (23; Fig. 4) which protrudes downward from a lower end of the inner wall, and the lower end portion is in contact with an inner circumferential surface of the mouth portion (not labeled but clearly seen in Fig. 8, noting it contacts the inner surface of the mouth portion of vial 30 on its radially outer side, and contacts the lower end of the inner wall on its radially inner side). Regarding claim 9, a medical container comprising: a container main body (30) including a tubular mouth portion which forms an opening through which a liquid passes and a housing portion which houses the liquid, and the medical cap according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1 above). Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claims 10-12 are allowed. 5. Claims 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 4, from which claims 5 and 6 depend, Classens fails to teach that the stopper further includes a connection portion which connects the lower portion to the internal portion via a through hole which penetrates through the case. While Classens teaches holes (25), they are not what connects the lower portion to the internal portion. Regarding claim 7, Classens fails to teach that the inner wall and the upper wall form a root-side recessed portion which is recessed from an outer circumferential surface of the inner wall, and the root-side recessed portion houses a portion of the lower portion. No such recessed portion is taught that includes the upper wall. Regarding claim 8, the internal portion of the stopper includes a large diameter portion which is surrounded by the inner wall and a small diameter portion smaller in outer diameter than the large diameter portion, the small diameter portion extends downward from a lower end of the large diameter portion, and a lower end of the inner wall is arranged at a position lower than the lower end of the large diameter portion and higher than a lower end of the small diameter portion. Classens teaches the opposite wherein the lower end has a larger diameter than any portion above. Regarding claim 10, from which claims 11 and 12 depend, Classens at least fails to teach that a lower portion which is arranged between the upper wall and the mouth portion that is arranged at the tubular space and a connection portion which connects the lower portion to the internal portion via a through hole which penetrates through the case. While Classens teaches holes (25), they are not what connects the lower portion to the internal portion. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES N SMALLEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4547. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 am to 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES N SMALLEY/Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767397
Closure Structure And Container With Closure Structure
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767433
Foot operated garbage bin lid opening system
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759767
CONTAINER, CLOSURE, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12735233
CUP LID AND CUP
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722856
CONTAINER FOR CONTENTS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (-9.8%)
2y 9m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1337 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month