Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/144,491

3D IMAGE DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, MEDIUM AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 29, 2025
Priority
Dec 30, 2022 — CN 202211734955.0 +1 more
Examiner
PARK, SUNGHYOUN
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huizhou TCL Cloud Internet Corporation Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
472 granted / 629 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 629 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Zheng Claims 1, 2, 12, 13, 20, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zheng et al.(USPubN 2022/0159230; hereafter Zheng). As per claim 1, Zheng teaches a three-dimensional (3D) image display method, comprising: receiving a 3D image display request sent from an application end(“the display mode is a three-dimensional display mode” in Para.[0014], “the requirements in three-dimensional watching scenes may be met” in Para.[0095]); acquiring, according to the 3D image display request, a screen output resolution format of the application end, and continuous initial left frame images and initial right frame images(“the original image data includes a left eye image and a right eye image” in Para.[0014], “when the display mode is a three-dimensional display mode, displaying gaze images corresponding to a left eye image and a right eye image in a fusion manner in a gaze area of the display and displaying a non-gaze image in the image to be displayed in a non-gaze area of the display by reducing the resolution according to the relationship between the resolution of the display at the image display terminal and the resolution of the image to be displayed corresponding to the target image data” in Para.[0018]); splicing the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images according to the screen output resolution format to obtain an image to be displayed(“dividing, according to the eye gaze parameters collected at the image display terminal, the left eye image into at least one first gaze area and a plurality of first non-gaze areas, dividing the right eye image into at least one second gaze area and a plurality of second non-gaze areas, sampling the at least one first gaze area and the at least one second gaze area using an original resolution to obtain at least one first gaze image and at least one second gaze image, and sampling the plurality of first non-gaze areas and the plurality of second non-gaze areas using a compressed resolution to obtain a plurality of first non-gaze images and a plurality of second non-gaze images; and splicing the at least one first gaze image, the at least one second gaze image, the plurality of first non-gaze images and the plurality of second non-gaze images to obtain the target image data” in Para.[0014]); sending the image to be displayed to the application end for data reading and cutting operation to obtain a left frame image and a right frame image; and sending the left frame image and the right frame image to a display end for image display(“After receiving the target image data, the image display terminal determines the display mode by analyzing the target image data, and then performs image display on the display in a scanning display manner corresponding to the display mode. Here, the image display terminal may parse the indication information of the display mode from the data header of the target image data, determine the display mode according to the indication information, and then perform image display in the scanning display manner corresponding to the display mode” in Para.[0049]). As per claim 2, Zheng teaches wherein when the screen output resolution format is a first format, the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: respectively performing an image format conversion operation on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images, such that a row data of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images is extended and a column data of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images is reduced; performing a vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images after the image format conversion operation to obtain the image to be displayed(Para.[0018]). As per claim 12, the limitations in the claim 12 has been discussed in the rejection claim 1 and rejected under the same rationale. As per claim 13, the limitations in the claim 13 has been discussed in the rejection claim 2 and rejected under the same rationale. As per claim 20, Zheng teaches a terminal device, comprising a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a plurality of instructions, and the processor loads the instructions to execute a 3D image display method(Para.[0022]), comprising: receiving an image to be displayed sent from a main board end(“the display mode is a three-dimensional display mode” in Para.[0014], “the requirements in three-dimensional watching scenes may be met” in Para.[0095]); performing a data reading and cutting operation on the image to be displayed to obtain a left frame image and a right frame image(“dividing, according to the eye gaze parameters collected at the image display terminal, the left eye image into at least one first gaze area and a plurality of first non-gaze areas, dividing the right eye image into at least one second gaze area and a plurality of second non-gaze areas, sampling the at least one first gaze area and the at least one second gaze area using an original resolution to obtain at least one first gaze image and at least one second gaze image, and sampling the plurality of first non-gaze areas and the plurality of second non-gaze areas using a compressed resolution to obtain a plurality of first non-gaze images and a plurality of second non-gaze images; and splicing the at least one first gaze image, the at least one second gaze image, the plurality of first non-gaze images and the plurality of second non-gaze images to obtain the target image data” in Para.[0014]); and sending the left frame image and the right frame image to a display end for image display(“After receiving the target image data, the image display terminal determines the display mode by analyzing the target image data, and then performs image display on the display in a scanning display manner corresponding to the display mode. Here, the image display terminal may parse the indication information of the display mode from the data header of the target image data, determine the display mode according to the indication information, and then perform image display in the scanning display manner corresponding to the display mode” in Para.[0049]). As per claim 22, Zheng teaches wherein executing the 3D image display method further comprises: receiving a 3D image display request sent from an application end; acquiring, according to the 3D image display request, a screen output resolution format of the application end, and continuous initial left frame images and initial right frame images; splicing the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images according to the screen output resolution format to obtain the image to be displayed; sending the image to be displayed to the application end for data reading and cutting operation to obtain the left frame image and the right frame image; and sending the left frame image and the right frame image to a display end for image display(Para.[0014], [0049]). As per claim 23, Zheng teaches wherein when the screen output resolution format is a first format, the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: respectively performing an image format conversion operation on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images, such that a row data of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images is extended and a column data of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images is reduced; performing a vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images after the image format conversion operation to obtain the image to be displayed(Para.[0018]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Zheng in view of Maleki Claims 3, 14 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng et al.(USPubN 2022/0159230; hereafter Zheng) in view of Maleki et al.(USPubN 2014/0347362; hereinafter Maleki). As per claim 3, Zheng teaches all of limitation of claim 1. Zheng teaches wherein when the screen output resolution format is a second format. Zheng is silent about the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: performing the vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed. Maleki teaches the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: performing the vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed(Para.[0032], Fig. 16). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings Zheng with the above teachings of Maleki in order to processing of images and video in order to show high quality 3D imagery. As per claim 14, the limitations in the claim 14 has been discussed in the rejection claim 3 and rejected under the same rationale. As per claim 24, Zheng teaches all of limitation of claim 20. Zheng teaches wherein when the screen output resolution format is a second format. Zheng is silent about the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: performing the vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed. Maleki teaches the splicing of the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed comprises: performing the vertical splicing on the initial left frame images and the initial right frame images to obtain the image to be displayed (Para.[0032], Fig. 16). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings Zheng with the above teachings of Maleki in order to processing of images and video in order to show high quality 3D imagery. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9, 15, 16, 21, and 25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNGHYOUN PARK whose telephone number is (571)270-1333. The examiner can normally be reached M - Thur 6:00 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THAI Q TRAN can be reached at (571)272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUNGHYOUN PARK/Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684227
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR EDITING VIDEO USING OBJECTS OF INTEREST AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670935
SCRATCHPAD CREATION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666110
MEDIA PLAYBACK METHOD FOR IMPROVING PLAYBACK RESPONSE TIME AND RELATED MEDIA PLAYBACK DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641190
REAL TIME VIDEO EDITING
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641741
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 9m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 629 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month