Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/146,166

STRUCTURAL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Priority
Mar 27, 2023 — JP 2023-049325 +2 more
Examiner
TO, TOAN C
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
NIPPON STEEL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
923 granted / 1008 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1019
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§102
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1008 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Recitation “in a case in which a length of a straight line that connects a boundary portion between one side wall of the two side walls and the top plate and a boundary portion between another side wall and the top plate is taken as a width of the top plate” in claim 1 renders the claim indefinite for being unclear because it is not known what boundary portions being claimed in order to determine a straight line that connects the boundary portions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE-10200805627 as recited by applicant. DE-10200805627 discloses a structural component comprising: a top plate (7-9); and two side walls (2-3) that are arranged facing each other, and that are each continuous with the top plate, wherein the structural component includes a curved region (a middle section as shown in fig. 1) which is curved with the top plate side being an inner side of a curve and an opposite side of the top plate being an outer side of the curve when viewed from a side wall side (see fig. 1), the two side walls (2,3) are connected by the top plate (7-9) on the inner side of the curve in the curved region, and the curved region is opened on the outer side of the curve (see fig. 1), when the curved region is viewed in transverse cross section, in a case in which a length of a straight line that connects a boundary portion between one side wall of the two side walls and the top plate and a boundary portion between another side wall and the top plate is taken as a width of the top plate, the top plate has a maximum width in the curved region (fig. 2 shows a middle section have a maximum width compares to the section on both end sides), the maximum width being larger than the width of the top plate on both end sides (see fig. 2) of the structural component, and when the curved region is viewed in transverse cross section, a sum of lengths of the two side walls is larger than the width of the top plate (see fig. 2); wherein the top plate includes sections that are arranged on both end sides of the structural component, and that have a constant width (fig. 2 shows the top portions on both end sides have constant width); wherein the maximum width is 110% or more and 220% or less of a minimum width of the top plate; when the curved region is viewed in transverse cross section, the two side walls are provided symmetrically with respect to a center of the top plate (see fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the closest prior art as to disclose every element of the invention as discussed above except that a flange that is continuous with at least one of the two side walls on the opposite side of the top plate, and that protrudes from the at least one of the side walls in a direction intersecting the side wall, wherein the flange passes through a bottom portion of the curved region and extends along the curved region on the outer side of the curve. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C TO whose telephone number is (571)272-6677. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JASON D SHANSKE can be reached at (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C TO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 June 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741499
VEHICLE MOTION CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12722442
USER ACCESSIBLE SHOCK TRAVEL SPACER
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716542
TOOL CARRIER COMPRISING A WHEEL DRIVING MODULE, AND TOOL CARRIER TRAIN
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709153
VEHICLE WITH E-AXLE
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12709243
AIRBAG DEVICE FOR VEHICLE
11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-3.5%)
1y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1008 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month