Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/147,452

SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR REACTIONLESS CYCLIC ROTORS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 11, 2025
Priority
Jan 13, 2023 — provisional 63/479,967 +1 more
Examiner
ADJAGBE, MAXIME M
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Supernal LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 706 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 706 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chando et al. (US 2022/0111959 A1) hereinafter Chando. Regarding claim 1, Chando teaches a rotor assembly comprising: a rotor mast (25) connected to a motor (13) and to a rotor hub, the rotor mast being rotatable about a first axis (Figs. 1-3; paras. 0025-0028), a plurality of blades (11, 12) connected to the rotor hub; the rotor hub including a shaft (70) (Fig. 1) connecting the blades, the shaft being rotatable about a second axis (Figs. 1-3); a swashplate (53) connected to the rotor mast and to the shaft (Fig. 1, para. 0028); and a single linkage (42) extending from a first end to a second end (Fig. 1, para. 0028) the first end being coupled to the shaft (the first end is coupled to the shaft via connecting member 62), the second end being coupled to the swashplate (the second end is coupled to the swash plate via motor mount 23) (Figs. 1-2; para. 0026-0029), the single linkage configured to transfer motion of the swashplate to rotation of the shaft about the second axis and thereby rotate the blades about the second axis simultaneously (paras. 0029-0029). Regarding claim 2, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 1. Chando further teaches the first end of the single linkage is formed on a pitch link (62) and the second end is formed on a control rod (41) (Fig. 1, para. 0024). Regarding claim 3, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 2. Chando further teaches the pitch link is coupled to the shaft at a center-most point of the shaft (Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 4, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 2. Chando further teaches a first end of the pitch link is generally cylindrical and includes an aperture configured to receive the shaft, wherein the first end of the pitch link forms the first end of the single linkage (Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 5, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 4. Chando further teaches a second end of the pitch link, opposite of the first end of the pitch link, is coupled to the control rod, wherein the second end of the pitch link is configured to pivot when lifted or lowered by the control rod (Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 6, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 1. Chando further teaches the shaft is configured to decrease a first angle of attack of a first blade and increase a second angle of attack of a second blade simultaneously (blades 11 and 12 are pitched in opposite direction, as the angle of attack of one blade decreases, the angle of attack of the other blade decreases; Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 7, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 1. Chando further teaches the shaft is connected to the rotor mast by two yoke protrusions (71, 72), the first end of the single linkage being disposed between the two yoke protrusions (Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 8, Chando teaches a rotor assembly comprising: a rotor mast (25) connecting a motor (13) to a rotor hub, the rotor mast being rotatable about a first axis that extends through the rotor mast (Figs. 1-3, paras. 0025-0028). at least two blades (11, 12) connected to the rotor hub (Figs. 1-2); a shaft (70) connecting the at least two blades, the shaft being rotatable about a second axis; a control rod (41); a swashplate (53) connected to the shaft by the control rod (Figs. 1-3; para. 0028) and a pitch link (62) connected to the shaft at a center of the shaft as measured along the second axis, the pitch link being configured to rotate the shaft around the second axis and thereby change an angle of attack of the at least two blades simultaneously (Figs. 1-2; para. 0026-0029). Regarding claim 9, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 8. Chando further teaches the shaft is a single shaft that passes through a center of the rotor assembly as measured along the second axis (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 10, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 9. Chando further teaches the control rod is connected to the shaft by the pitch link (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 11, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 9. Chando further teaches a first end of the pitch link is generally cylindrical and includes an aperture configured to receive the shaft (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 12, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 9. Chando further teaches the pitch link extends towards the control rod in a direction perpendicular to the second axis (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 13, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 8. Chando further teaches the shaft is connected the rotor hub by two yoke protrusions (71, 72) (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 14, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 13. Chando further teaches the pitch link is disposed between the two yokes (71, 72) protrusions (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 15, Chando teaches a vehicle comprising: a first rotor assembly comprising: a first set of at least two blades (11, 12) (Figs. 1-3); a first shaft (70) connected to the first set of at least two blades (Figs. 1-3), the first shaft being rotatable about a first axis (Figs. 1-3); and a first pitch link (62) connected to the first shaft at a center of the first shaft as measured along the first axis and configured to rotate the first shaft along the first axis and thereby change an angle of attack of the first set of at least two blades (Figs. 1-3, para. 0024); and a second rotor assembly comprising: a second set of at least two blades (11, 12) (Figs. 1-3); a second shaft (70) connected to the second set of at least two blades, the second shaft being rotatable about a second axis (Figs. 1-3); and a second pitch link (62) connected to the second shaft at a center of the second shaft as measured along the second axis and configured to rotate the second shaft along the second axis and thereby change an angle of attack of the second set of at least two blades (Figs. 1-3, para. 0024). Note that the vehicle is a fixed wings UAV and as known in the art each wing comprises the rotors assembly disclosed in Figs. 1-3. Regarding claim 16, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 16. Chando further teaches the first rotor assembly includes a first swashplate (53) connected to the first shaft by a first control rod (41), and the second rotor assembly includes a second swashplate (53) connected to the second shaft by a second control rod (41) (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 17, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 16. Chando further teaches the first control rod is connected to the first shaft by the first pitch link, and the second control rod is connected to the second shaft by the second pitch link (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 18, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 16. Chando further teaches a first end of the first pitch link defines a cylindrical aperture configured to receive the first shaft, wherein a first end of the second pitch link defines a cylindrical aperture configured to receive the second shaft (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 19, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 16. Chando further teaches the first set of at least two blades are configured to be rotated by the connection to the first swashplate every revolution and the second set of at least two blades are rotated by the connection to the second swashplate every revolution (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claim 20, Chando teaches all the claimed limitations as stated above in claim 16. Chando further teaches the first shaft is configured to decrease a first angle of attack of a first blade of the first set of at least two blades and increase a second angle of attack of a second blade of the first set of at least two blades simultaneously; and the second shaft is configured to decrease a third angle of attack of a third blade of the second set of at least two blades and increase a fourth angle of attack of a fourth blade of the second set of at least two blades simultaneously (blades 11 and 12 are pitched in opposite direction, as the angle of attack of one blade decreases, the angle of attack of the other blade decreases; Figs. 1-2; para. 0026-0029). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 10,882,611 B2; US 2023/0091534 A1; US 2023/0009101 A1; US 2019/0193835 A1 each discloses rotor assemblies including pitch link and swashplate. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAXIME M ADJAGBE whose telephone number is (571)272-4920. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHANIEL E WIEHE can be reached at 571-272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAXIME M ADJAGBE/Examiner, Art Unit 3745 /NATHANIEL E WIEHE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698753
METHOD FOR YAW CONTROL OF A WIND TURBINE AND A WIND TURBINE HAVING A YAW CONTROL
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692799
CONTAINMENT RING FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680550
COMPRESSOR SHROUD WITH CONTROLLABLE BYPASS COMPONENT FORMED OF THERMALLY ADAPTIVE MATERIALS AND A THERMOELECTRIC JUNCTION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680555
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12637997
OCEAN WAVE AND TIDAL CURRENT ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 8m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 706 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month