Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/147,804

DISPLAY DRIVING DEVICE AND DISPLAY DRIVING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 01, 2023 — CN 202311121220.5 +1 more
Examiner
ADAMS, CARL
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
574 granted / 799 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 799 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US Pub. No. 2024/0021128 A1). As to claims 1 and 8, Lee shows a display driving (Fig. 1 and para. 33) device and associated methodology (Fig. 3 and para. 63), comprising: a processor 110/920 (Figs. 2 and 9 and paras. 44, 45 and 113); and a memory 930 storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, configure the display driving device (Fig. 9 and para. 115) to: provide control data (TE/touch data/environmental data, etc., paras. 47 and 54) and input display data having a first frequency (Fig. 1 and paras. 40 and 41), wherein the input display data comprises at least one first display data for displaying in at least one first display area 12 of a display screen and at least one second display data for displaying in at least one second display area 11 of the display screen (Fig. 1 and paras. 40 and 41), and wherein the control data indicates that display data with a lower refresh rate is required for the at least one first display area and display data with a higher refresh rate is required for the at least one second display area (Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92); perform a first format conversion on the at least one first display data to generate at least one converted first display data having a second frequency (Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92); perform a second format conversion on the at least one second display data to generate at least one converted second display data having the second frequency (Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92); combine the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data to generate output display data having the second frequency (Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92); and provide the output display data to the display screen for displaying (Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92); wherein the second frequency is N times the first frequency, and N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 (paras. 86, 92 and 93). As to claims 2 and 9, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the first format conversion on the at least one first display data by: replicating each frame of each of the at least one first display data N times (i.e. operating at a lower frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claims 3 and 10, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the second format conversion on the at least one second display data by: dividing each frame of each of the at least one second display data into N frames (i.e. operating at a higher frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claims 4 and 11, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to combine the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data by: performing, for the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data, the following operation: reading a frame of each of the at least one converted first display data and a corresponding frame of each of the at least one converted second display data sequentially to form a frame of the output display data (i.e. producing a composite display, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claims 5 and 12, Lee shows that the first frequency is 30 Hz and the second frequency is 60 Hz (paras. 92 and 93). As to claims 17 and 20, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the first format conversion on the at least one first display data by: replicating each frame of each of the at least one first display data N times (i.e. operating at a lower frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 18, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the second format conversion on the at least one second display data by: dividing each frame of each of the at least one second display data into N frames (i.e. operating at a higher frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 19, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to combine the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data by: performing, for the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data, the following operation: reading a frame of each of the at least one converted first display data and a corresponding frame of each of the at least one converted second display data sequentially to form a frame of the output display data (i.e. producing a composite display, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 6, Lee shows a display system comprising a display driving device according to claim1 and a display screen (see rejection above). As to claim 13, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the first format conversion on the at least one first display data by: replicating each frame of each of the at least one first display data N times (i.e. operating at a lower frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 14, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to perform the second format conversion on the at least one second display data by: dividing each frame of each of the at least one second display data into N frames (i.e. operating at a higher frequency/refresh rate, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 15, Lee shows that the display driving device is further configured to combine the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data by: performing, for the at least one converted first display data and the at least one converted second display data, the following operation: reading a frame of each of the at least one converted first display data and a corresponding frame of each of the at least one converted second display data sequentially to form a frame of the output display data (i.e. producing a composite display, Figs. 5A, 5B and 6A – 6C and paras. 47, 54, 84 – 86 and 92). As to claim 16, Lee shows that the first frequency is 30 Hz and the second frequency is 60 Hz (paras. 92 and 93). As to claim 7, Lee shows that the device is mounted on a vehicle (para. 133). CONCLUSION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARL ADAMS whose telephone number is (571)270-7448. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARL ADAMS/Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704908
SWITCHABLE CONVERSION OF A STANDARD KEYBOARD TO A BRAILLE INTERFACE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706029
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699214
Multilayer Optical Film and Glass Laminate Including Same
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681567
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING A CONTROLLER
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681582
HAPTIC FEEDBACK SUBSTRATE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND TOUCH DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 7m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 799 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month