Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/150,775

PROPULSION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Priority
May 17, 2023 — JP 2023-081514 +1 more
Examiner
WOLDEMARYAM, ASSRES H
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
592 granted / 719 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
742
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 719 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in regards to application # 19/150,775 that was filed on 07/24/2025. Claims 1-7 are currently pending and are under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The mathematical expression recited on line 3 of claim 6 do not contain a variable ‘z’, but in line 18 of the claim the variable ‘z’ is defined as the number of the plurality of blades. It is not clear to the examiner how the variable is relevant and applied to the mathematical expression of line 3. Therefore, the claim is considered vague and indefinite. Appropriate correction/clarification required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2)as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (US 2017/0305542). Regarding Claim 1, Zhang discloses a propulsion device comprising: a motor (100, Fig. 1A-1B, Fig. 2).; a rotation shaft driven by the motor (331, Fig. 2, 6, para. [0073]); and a fan (200, Fig. 2) attached to the rotation shaft, wherein the fan includes a hub portion (210, Fig. 2-3) attached to the rotation shaft and a plurality of blades (220, Fig. 2) provided at equal intervals on an outer periphery of the hub portion (Fig. 3), the hub portion (210, Fig. 2-3) has a plurality of hole portions arranged at equal intervals in a circumferential direction of the hub portion (see annotated Fig. 2 below), and at least a part of side surfaces of the plurality of hole portions is sloped with respect to a center axis of the rotation shaft (see annotated Fig. 2 below). PNG media_image1.png 632 675 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Zhang discloses a propulsion device wherein at least a part of side surfaces of the plurality of hole portions is sloped toward a rotation direction of the fan with respect to the center axis of the rotation shaft (clearly shown in the annotate Fig. 2 above) Regarding Claim 3, Zhang discloses a propulsion device wherein a cross-sectional area of a beam portion (321, Fig. 2 above), which is a portion of the hub portion sandwiched between two adjacent hole portions among the plurality of hole portions, in the circumferential direction of the hub portion is set such that a stress generated in the beam portion is smaller than a stress generated in the plurality of blades (the stress at the plurality of the blades would clearly be greater than the stress at 321 due to the rotation and centrifugal forces; and the plurality of the blades are placed on the side surface of 210, see Fig. 2 above). Regarding Claim 4, Zhang discloses a propulsion device wherein the number of the plurality of hole portions is an integral multiple of the number of the plurality of blades (number of holes is 3 and number of blades is 3; 3 is an integral multiple of 3 by 1, see Fig. 2 above). Regarding Claim 5, Zhang discloses a propulsion device wherein the number of the plurality of blades (number of blades 3, see Fig. 2) and the number of the plurality of hole portions are the same (number of hole portion is also 3, Fig. 2), and one entire blade among the plurality of blades and an entire beam portion which is a portion of the hub portion sandwiched between two adjacent hole portions among the plurality of hole portions are accommodated in a region obtained by equally dividing the fan by the number of the plurality of blades (see Fig. 2 above). Regarding Claim 7, Zhang discloses a propulsion device wherein when the fan (200, Fig. 2) is projected onto a plane perpendicular to the rotation shaft(331, Fig. 2), projection planes of two adjacent blades among the plurality of blades do not overlap each other (220, Fig. 2-3). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Zhang et al. (US 11,420,734) discloses a propeller, a propeller kit, a power assembly, a power kit and an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The propeller includes a hub and at least two blades connected to the hub. The hub is detachably mounted on a corresponding drive apparatus by a mounting member corresponding to the hub, so that the propeller is mounted on the corresponding drive apparatus. A surface, facing the mounting member, of the hub is provided with a first fitting portion. A surface, facing the hub, of the mounting member is provided with a second fitting portion corresponding to the first fitting portion. The first fitting portion matches the second fitting portion. In the foregoing manner, a user can be prevented from incorrectly mounting a forward propeller and a counter-rotating propeller during the use of a quick-detachable propeller in the embodiments of the present application. Zhang also discloses a plurality of propellers and the hub with a plurality of hole portions (see Figs 5a-5b, 6a, 6b). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASSRES H WOLDEMARYAM whose telephone number is (571)272-6607. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Assres H. Woldemaryam Primary Examiner (Aeronautics and Astronautics) Art Unit 3642 /ASSRES H WOLDEMARYAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704635
LIDAR SYSTEM HAVING A RAY OPTICS DIAGNOSIS
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704631
VEHICLE LIDAR SYSTEM AND OBJECT DETECTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706560
SYSTEM FOR TRACKING SOLAR ENERGY
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704361
FIN CONTROL ACTUATION SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703514
Multifunctional Structures for Attitude Control
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 8m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 719 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month