Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/156,839

PRESENTATION CONTROL DEVICE, PRESENTATION SYSTEM, AND PRESENTATION CONTROL METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 14, 2025
Priority
Mar 06, 2023 — JP 2023-034052 +1 more
Examiner
MATTHEWS, ANDRE L
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
329 granted / 529 resolved
At TC average
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
554
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
70.9%
+30.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 529 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McCulloch (US 9,183,676) in view of Wright (US 2016/0379408) . Regarding claims 1 and 13, McCulloch teaches A presentation control device comprising: a presenter that causes a presentation device to present presentation information that contains the position information to a non-wearer who is not wearing the wearable member (Fig. 9A-9B and the respective description teach a second user enters an environment of a first user and both users can view virtual object information (displayed) on each user’s augmented device by sharing mode so both users can see the same content.. Based on this teaching it is understood that the position information of each object is presented for both devices and the original content seen by user 2 is presented to user 1 (whom is not wearing user 2 augmented device) and vice versa.). Although McCulloch teaches the limitations as discussed above, he does not explicitly teach an acquirer that acquires position information that indicates a corresponding position of a visual target object in a real space, the corresponding position corresponding to a position of the visual target object in content viewed by a wearer, the content being displayed on a display device provided in a wearable member worn by the wearer. However in the field of presenting information to user through an augmented device, Wright teaches an acquirer that acquires position information that indicates a corresponding position of a visual target object in a real space (Fig. 9 end table 108B), the corresponding position corresponding to a position of the visual target object in content viewed by a wearer ([0049][0056-0058][0065][0073] teach that the system presents a mixed reality of presented virtual objects in alignment with the surrounding environment) , the content being displayed on a display device provided in a wearable member worn (HMD 104) by the wearer. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the presentation method as taught by McCulloch with the presentation method as taught by Wright. This combination provides an improved immersive experience by properly aligning virtual objects in physical space environments. Regarding claim 2, Wright teaches wherein the acquirer acquires the position information by determining, based on line-of- sight information (gaze vector that determines where a user is looking) that indicates a line of sight of the wearer, the visual target object in the content viewed by the wearer, and calculating the corresponding position of the visual target object determined in the real space ([0034-0035][0039][0073] teaches based on tracking a wearer’s eyes the system can identify if the user is gazing at a physical object and/or virtual object). Regarding claim 3, Wright teaches wherein the acquirer makes, based on the line-of-sight information, a determination as to whether the visual target object viewed by the wearer is the visual target object in the content or the visual target object in the real space, and determines a presentation form for presenting the presentation information, based on a result of the determination ([0073] teaches based on tracking a wearer’s eyes the system can identify if the user is gazing at a physical object and/or virtual object)., and McCulloch teaches the method where a the presenter causes the presentation device to present the presentation information in a presentation form determined (Fig. 9A-9B and the respective description teach a second user enters an environment of a first user and both users can view virtual object information (displayed) on each user’s augmented device by sharing mode so both users can see the same content. Therefore it is obvious the system determines how to present the content of both augmented devices together). Regarding claim 4, Wright teaches wherein the presentation information further contains target object information that corresponds to at least one of a size, a direction of movement, a color, or a shape of the visual target object in the content viewed by the wearer ([0033]). Regarding claim 5, McCulloch teaches a method of gathering image information wherein the presentation information further contains meta-information (structural data) that is related to the content (Col. 16 lines 37-67 through Col. 17 lines 1-9). Regarding claim 6, McCulloch teaches wherein the presentation device includes an electronic device used by the non-wearer, and the presenter causes the electronic device to present the presentation information by transmitting the presentation information to the electronic device (Fig. 9A-9B and the respective description teach a second user enters an environment of a first user and both users can view virtual object information (displayed) on each user’s augmented device by sharing mode so the both users can see the same content. Based on this teaching it is understood that the position information of each object is presented for both devices and the original content seen by user 2 is presented to user 1 (whom is not wearing user 2 augmented device) and vice versa.). Regarding claim 7, McCulloch teaches wherein the presentation device includes (augmented display devices 2) an emission source that emits any one of light (micro display projector of image generation unit 120) , a liquid, a powder, or a gas, and the presenter causes the emission source to present the presentation information by controlling, based on the presentation information, the emission source to emit any one of the light, the liquid, the powder, or the gas (Col. 9 lines 9-21). Regarding claim 8, McCulloch teaches wherein the presentation device includes a projector, and the presenter causes the projector to present the presentation information by controlling, based on the presentation information, the projector to project a visual image of the object in the content viewed by the wearer (Col. 9 lines 9-21) and Wright teaches presenting a visual image of a visual target object ([0049][0056-0058][0065][0073] teach that the system presents a mixed reality of presented virtual objects in alignment with the surrounding environment). Regarding claim 9, McCulloch teaches wherein the presentation device includes a mobile unit, and the presenter causes the mobile unit to present the presentation information by controlling, based on the presentation information, the mobile unit to move (Fig. 9A-9B show multiple users with their respective augmented device 2, which are mobile with the user). Regarding claim 10, Wright teaches wherein the acquirer determines a presentation form for presenting the presentation information based on external environment information regarding an environment of a location, in the real space, where the wearer is present([0049][0056-0058][0065][0073] teach that the system presents a mixed reality of presented virtual objects in alignment with the surrounding environment), and McCulloch teaches the presenter causes the presentation device to present the presentation information in the presentation form determined (Fig. 9A-9B and the respective description teach a second user enters an environment of a first user and both users can view virtual object information (displayed) on each user’s augmented device by sharing mode so both users can see the same content. Therefore it is obvious the system determines how to present the content of both augmented devices together). Regarding claim 11, McCulloch teaches wherein the external environment information contains information regarding the non- wearer who is at the location, in the real space, where the wearer is present. (Fig. 9A-9B and the respective description teach a second user enters an environment of a first user and both users can view virtual object information (displayed) on each user’s augmented device by sharing mode so both users can see the same content.. Based on this teaching it is understood that the position information of each object is presented for both devices and the original content seen by user 2 is presented to user 1 (whom is not wearing user 2 augmented device) and vice versa.). Regarding claim 12, McCulloch teaches A presentation system comprising: the presentation control device according to claim 1; the wearable member; the display device; and the presentation device (augmented display device 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE L MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)270-5806. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571-272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDRE L MATTHEWS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12711889
CONTROL OF THE IMAGE REPRODUCTION OF A DISPLAY APPARATUS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12710863
DISPLAY CONTROL APPARATUS, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAM
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12699497
VIRTUAL USER INPUT CONTROLS IN A MIXED REALITY ENVIRONMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693824
DISPLAY METHOD, CHIP, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688804
TEST SYSTEM, METHOD OF TESTING DISPLAY CELL USING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+14.5%)
3y 5m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 529 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month