Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/164,708

LONG-SHORT COMPOSITE YARN HAVING EXCELLENT UNIFORMITY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Priority
Mar 16, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0034498 +2 more
Examiner
HURLEY, SHAUN R
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Atko Planning Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1297 granted / 1674 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1697
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1674 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, the phrase “5 mm or less” is unclear. This range would seem to include a length of zero mm, which would mean no fiber is present. Is fiber present, or is no fiber an option? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the 88abasis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 5 is/are rejected, to the degree definite, under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goenka et al (20180347077). In regards to Claims 1 and 5, Goenka teaches a long-short composite yarn (Detail 80) comprising: a short-fiber having a length of 5 mm or less (Detail 88a; length of 0 mm, not present) portion consisting of a plurality of short fibers adjacent to each other; and a long fiber portion (Detail 84a) consisting of a plurality of long fibers formed by twisting on an outer peripheral surface of the short-fiber portion. In regards to Claim 4, Goenka teaches the long fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of polyester-based fibers, polyamide-based fibers, polyurethane-based fibers, polyurea-based fibers, polyacrylic-based fibers, polyvinyl alcohol- based fibers, polyvinyl chloride-based fibers, polyvinylidene chloride-based fibers, polypropylene-based fibers, polyethylene-based fibers, polystyrene-based fibers, 19 polyfluoroethylene-based fibers, biodegradable fibers, and combinations thereof (Paragraph 33). Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ahn (KR 20050122584). In regards to Claim 1, Ahn teaches a long-short composite yarn comprising: a short-fiber portion consisting of a plurality of short fibers adjacent to each other (Detail 3); and a long fiber portion consisting of a plurality of long fibers formed by twisting on an outer peripheral surface of the short-fiber portion (Details 1, 2). In regards to Claim 2, Ahn teaches the short fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of vegetable fibers, animal fibers, mineral fibers, regenerated fibers thereof, and combinations thereof (Description: cotton, wool). In regards to Claim 3, Ahn teaches the vegetable fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of cotton fiber, cellulose fiber, hemp fiber, pineapple fiber, coffee bean fiber, banana fiber, ramie fiber, corn silk fiber, bamboo fiber, and combinations thereof, the animal fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of leather fiber, wool fiber, cashmere, camel hair fiber, mohair fiber, alpaca fiber, silk fiber, and combinations thereof, and the mineral fibers are mica fibers or glass fibers (Description: cotton, wool). In regards to Claim 4, Ahn teaches the long fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of polyester-based fibers, polyamide-based fibers, polyurethane-based fibers, polyurea-based fibers, polyacrylic-based fibers, polyvinyl alcohol- based fibers, polyvinyl chloride-based fibers, polyvinylidene chloride-based fibers, polypropylene-based fibers, polyethylene-based fibers, polystyrene-based fibers, 19 polyfluoroethylene-based fibers, biodegradable fibers, and combinations thereof (Description: polyester). Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maag et al (4028874)). In regards to Claim 1, Maag teaches a long-short composite yarn comprising: a short-fiber portion consisting of a plurality of short fibers adjacent to each other (Detail 1); and a long fiber portion consisting of a plurality of long fibers formed by twisting on an outer peripheral surface of the short-fiber portion (Detail 2). In regards to Claim 2, Maag teaches the short fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of vegetable fibers, animal fibers, mineral fibers, regenerated fibers thereof, and combinations thereof (Column 2, lines 42-46: cotton, wool). In regards to Claim 3, Maag teaches the vegetable fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of cotton fiber, cellulose fiber, hemp fiber, pineapple fiber, coffee bean fiber, banana fiber, ramie fiber, corn silk fiber, bamboo fiber, and combinations thereof, the animal fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of leather fiber, wool fiber, cashmere, camel hair fiber, mohair fiber, alpaca fiber, silk fiber, and combinations thereof, and the mineral fibers are mica fibers or glass fibers Column 2, lines 42-46: cotton, wool). In regards to Claim 4, Maag teaches the long fibers include a material selected from the group consisting of polyester-based fibers, polyamide-based fibers, polyurethane-based fibers, polyurea-based fibers, polyacrylic-based fibers, polyvinyl alcohol- based fibers, polyvinyl chloride-based fibers, polyvinylidene chloride-based fibers, polypropylene-based fibers, polyethylene-based fibers, polystyrene-based fibers, 19 polyfluoroethylene-based fibers, biodegradable fibers, and combinations thereof (Column 3, lines 45-52: polyester, polyamide). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See of Record. Specifically, at least Andrews (6803332) Figure 1, Schwartz (4346553) Figure 3, Drummond (4024700) Figure 8, Marzocchi (3857229) Figures 4-7, 11, and Northup et al (3831369) Figure 3 teach element similar to those as currently claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shaun R Hurley whose telephone number is (571)272-4986. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:00am - 3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton T Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAUN R HURLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703936
BRAIDING MACHINE AND METHODS OF USE
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703935
BRAIDING MACHINE WITH A RESERVE ZONE
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691023
EXERCISE ASSISTANCE DEVICE INCLUDING SLIDER IN WHICH BALLS ARE ACCOMODATED
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685269
Mis-Tie Detection for Baler Knotter
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680225
FOLDING ASSISTANCE DEVICE AND FOLDING APPARATUS INCLUDING FOLDING ASSISTANCE DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+17.7%)
2y 2m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1674 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month