Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/166,495

VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Priority
Mar 20, 2023 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2023010899
Examiner
TROOST, AARON L
Art Unit
3666
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
559 granted / 748 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 748 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 14-26 of US Application No. 19/166,495, filed on 18 September 2025, are currently pending and have been examined. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 18 September 2025 has been considered. An initialed copy of form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14-16, 19-21, 25, and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oniwa (US 2018/0345967 A1). Regarding claims 14, 25, and 26, Oniwa discloses a vehicle control system and method and teaches: a storage medium storing computer-readable instructions; and at least one processor connected to the storage medium, wherein the processor executes the computer-readable instructions (automated driving control unit 100 comprising processors executing software stored on a storage device – see at least Fig. 1 and ¶ [0031], [0047]) to: recognize surrounding circumstances of a vehicle (object recognition device 16 recognizes position, type, speed of objects around vehicle 1 – see at least Fig. 1 and ¶ [0036]); determine whether or not a driver of the vehicle is gripping a steering wheel of the vehicle (grip sensor 80a – see at least Fig. 1 and ¶ [0046]); and control a speed of the vehicle and steering of the vehicle on the basis of the surrounding circumstances (automated driving control unit 100 includes travel controller 141 that controls driving force output device 200, brake device 210, and steering device 220 such that the vehicle passes along a target trajectory generated by behavior plan generator 123 – see at least Fig. 1 and ¶ [0057]; target trajectory includes target speed Vt – see at least ¶ [0053]; steering and speed control based on environmental information – see at least ¶ [0015]), cause the vehicle to travel according to a first speed plan in a case where the driver is gripping the steering wheel (vehicle speed determined at S112 based on the occupant being in a hands-on state determined at S110 – see at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0090], [0093]; i.e., first speed plan = Vt set at S112) and causes the vehicle to travel according to a second speed plan for causing the vehicle to travel at a speed lower than a speed according to the first speed plan in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road (vehicle speed determined at S114 based on the occupant being in a hands-off state determined at S110 – see at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0090], [0093]; β > α, i.e., Vt at S112 > Vt at S114 – see at least ¶ [0093]; i.e., second speed plan = Vt set at S114), the first speed plan and the second speed plan are information indicating transition of the speed of the vehicle when traveling on the curved road (S106-S128 are performed when a branching event, i.e., curve traveling event, is determined at S104 – see at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0077]), and the second speed plan is switched to the first speed plan and the vehicle is caused to travel on the basis of the first speed plan when it is determined that the driver has gripped the steering wheel in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel and the vehicle is caused to travel on the curved road according to the second speed plan (at S126, target trajectory, which includes target speed Vt selected at S112, S114, S118, or S120,, is generated – see at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0106]). Regarding claim 15, Oniwa further teaches: wherein the processor executes the computer-readable instructions to: restrain a deceleration degree of the vehicle or accelerates the vehicle to cause the speed of the vehicle to match a speed prescribed in the first speed plan when the driver grips the steering wheel in a case where the speed of the vehicle is controlled on the basis of the second speed plan (after S128, the steps of Fig. 5 are repeated – see at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0075]; When hand-off is YES at S110 in a first execution of the control of Fig. 5, Vt is set at S114 and when hands-off is NO in a subsequent execution, Vt is set at S112. Vt at S112 > Vt at S114. Therefore, vehicle speed is increased, i.e., vehicle is accelerated, at S128 by controlling driving force output device 200. See at least Fig. 5 and ¶ [0106]-[0107]). Regarding claim 16, Oniwa further teaches: cause the vehicle to travel at a first speed according to the first speed plan in a case where the driver is gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, cause the vehicle to travel at a second speed according to the second speed plan lower than the first speed in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, and accelerate the vehicle to the first speed when it is determined that the driver has changed from a state of not gripping the steering wheel to a state where the driver is gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling at the second speed (the steps of Fig. 5 may be repeated such that each time the driver changes his grip state, a new target speed Vt is set at S112, S114, S118, or S120 and travel control is executed at S128 based on the new target speed – see at least Fig. 5 and related text). Regarding claim 19, Oniwa further teaches: decelerate the vehicle to a first speed according to the first speed plan in a case where the driver is gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, decelerate the vehicle to a second speed according to the second speed plan lower than the first speed in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, and accelerate the vehicle or restrains a degree of deceleration when it is determined that the driver has gripped the steering wheel in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel and the vehicle is decelerated to be closer to the second speed while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road (the steps of Fig. 5 may be repeated such that each time the driver changes his grip state, a new target speed Vt is set at S112, S114, S118, or S120 and travel control is executed at S128 based on the new target speed – see at least Fig. 5 and related text; travel control includes control of travel driving force output device 200 and brake device 210 on the bases of target speed Vt – see at least ¶ [0107]). Regarding claim 20, Oniwa further teaches: in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel and the vehicle is decelerated to be closer to the second speed while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, decelerate the vehicle to the first speed instead of decelerating the vehicle to the second speed when the driver grips the steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle exceeds the first speed (the steps of Fig. 5 may be repeated such that each time the driver changes his grip state, a new target speed Vt is set at S112, S114, S118, or S120 and travel control is executed at S128 based on the new target speed – see at least Fig. 5 and related text; travel control includes control of travel driving force output device 200 and brake device 210 on the bases of target speed Vt – see at least ¶ [0107]). Regarding claim 21, Oniwa further teaches: in a case where the driver is not gripping the steering wheel and the vehicle is decelerated to be closer to the second speed while the vehicle is traveling on a curved road, accelerate the vehicle to the first speed when the driver grips the steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle is lower than the first speed (the steps of Fig. 5 may be repeated such that each time the driver changes his grip state, a new target speed Vt is set at S112, S114, S118, or S120 and travel control is executed at S128 based on the new target speed – see at least Fig. 5 and related text; travel control includes control of travel driving force output device 200 and brake device 210 on the bases of target speed Vt – see at least ¶ [0107]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17, 18, and 22-24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON L TROOST whose telephone number is (571)270-5779. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Antonucci can be reached at 313-446-6519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON L TROOST/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3666
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741637
CALCULATING VEHICLE SPEED FOR A ROAD CURVE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736363
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESERVING ROUTE INSTRUCTION INFORMATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724425
Detection Method, Detection Program, And Work Vehicle
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724408
WATERCRAFT AUTO-DOCKING SYSTEM AND WATERCRAFT AUTO-DOCKING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12709294
DATA SYNTHESIS FOR AUTONOMOUS CONTROL SYSTEMS
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 5m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 748 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month