Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/170,760

ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING COMMUNICATION CIRCUIT AND CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 04, 2025
Priority
Oct 28, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0141845 +2 more
Examiner
AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 564 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 564 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-8, 10-16 and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Graber US 10681818. PNG media_image1.png 647 822 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 672 812 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Graber US 10681818 discloses (in annotated Fig. 4 and 6) an electronic device comprising: a housing (410); a circuit board (430) disposed within the housing and including a ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430; see 212/228 in Fig. 2); a battery (450) disposed within the housing and including a protection circuit (440) configured to control charging; a communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) disposed on the circuit board (430); a first connector (442) disposed on the circuit board (430) and electrically connected to the protection circuit (440); and a second connector (438’) disposed on the circuit board (430) and spaced apart from the first connector (442), wherein the second connector (438’) is closer to the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) than the first connector (442) and electrically connected to the ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430) of the circuit board (430) or the battery (450). Regarding claim 2, Graber discloses the electronic device of The electronic device of wherein the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) is configured to receive power from the battery (450), using the first connector (442), and wherein a return current generated from the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) is configured to be transmitted to the ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430) of the circuit board (430) or the battery (450), using the second connector (438’). Regarding claim 3, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the second connector (438’) is connected to the ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430) of the circuit board (430). Regarding claim 4, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the protection circuit (440) is closer to the first connector (442) than to the second connector (438’). Regarding claim 6, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the circuit board (430) includes a first area (A1) accommodating the first connector (442) and a second area (A2) accommodating the second connector (438’) and the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434). Regarding claim 7, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, further comprising: an insulating area (inherent insulating layer of 440) at least partially located between the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) and the first connector (442). Regarding claim 8, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 7, wherein the insulation area includes a first end (left end of inherent insulating layer of 440) connected to a first edge (left edge of 430) of the circuit board (430) and a second end (right end of inherent insulating layer of 440) opposite to the first end (left end of inherent insulating layer of 440) and located at a second edge (right edge of 430) of the circuit board (430). Regarding claim 10, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the first connector (442) is connected to a negative electrode or a positive electrode of the battery (450; 442 is indirectly connected to the positive electrode of 450). Regarding claim 11, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the second connector (438’) is electrically connected to the battery (450), and wherein a distance between the first connector (442) and the protection circuit (440) is smaller than a distance between the second connector (438’) and the protection circuit (440). Regarding claim 12, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the second connector (438’) includes at least one of a conductive pad, a conductive pin, a cable structure, or a connector connected to a flexible printed circuit board (as depicted in Fig. 6). Regarding claim 13, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, further comprising: an analog circuit (one of the circuit portion of 430 with 434 or the circuit portion of 430 with 436) located between the first connector (442) and the second connector (438’). Regarding claim 14, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, further comprising: a digital component (432) located between the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) and the second connector (438’). Regarding claim 15, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the second connector (438’) is located between the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) and the battery (450). Regarding claim 16, Graber US 10681818 discloses (in annotated Fig. 4 and 6) an electronic device comprising: a housing (410); a circuit board (430) disposed within the housing (410) and including a ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430; see 212/228 in Fig. 2); a battery (450) disposed within the housing (410) and including a protection circuit (440) configured to control charging; a communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) disposed on the circuit board (430); a first connector (442) disposed on the circuit board (430) and electrically connected to the protection circuit (440); and a second connector (438’) disposed on the circuit board (430) and spaced apart from the first connector (442), the second connector (438’) being connected to the ground layer (inherent ground layer of 430), wherein the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) is closer to the second connector (438’) than to the first connector (442), and wherein the protection circuit (440) is closer to the first connector (442) than to the second connector (438’). Regarding claim 19, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 16, wherein the second connector (438’) is located between the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434) and the battery (450). Regarding claim 20, Graber discloses the electronic device of claim 16, wherein the circuit board (430) includes a first area (A1) accommodating the first connector (442) and a second area (A2) accommodating the second connector (438’) and the communication circuit (circuit portion of 430 with 434). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 9 and 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 5, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations recited in claim 1, a combination of limitations that “wherein a magnitude of return current transmitted from the communication circuit to the second connector is greater than a magnitude of return current transmitted from the communication circuit to the first connector”. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Regarding claim 9, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations recited in claim 1, a combination of limitations that “wherein the second connector is a joint test action group (JTAG) connector”. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Regarding claim 17, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations recited in claim 16, a combination of limitations that “wherein the communication circuit is configured to receive power from the battery using the first connector, and wherein a return current generated from the communication circuit is configured to be transmitted to the ground layer of the circuit board using the second connector”. Regarding claim 18, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combining with other limitations recited in claim 16, a combination of limitations that “wherein a magnitude of return current transmitted from the communication circuit to the second connector is greater than a magnitude of return current transmitted from the communication circuit to the first connector”. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. None of the reference art of record discloses or renders obvious such a combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Regarding claim 1, Yosui US 20160270211 in Fig. 7 discloses an electronic device comprising: a housing; a circuit board disposed within the housing and including a ground layer; a battery disposed within the housing; a communication circuit disposed on the circuit board; a first connector disposed on the circuit board. Ju US 20210378096 Fig. 2a and 3b; Kim US 20170290184 Fig. 1, 2c, 3 and 5a disclose an electronic device comprising: a housing; a circuit board disposed within the housing; a battery disposed within the housing; and a first connector disposed on the circuit board; a second connector disposed on the circuit board and spaced apart from the first connector. Yang US 20170346315 Fig. 7-8, 15, and 19-20 discloses an electronic device comprising: a housing ; a circuit board disposed within the housing; a ground layer; a battery disposed within the housing and including a protection circuit; a communication circuit; and a connector. Han US 20220329937 Fig. 4; Qu US 20220311062 Fig. 2 disclose an electronic device comprising: a housing; a circuit board disposed within the housing; a battery disposed within the housing; and a first connector disposed on the circuit board. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER L AUGUSTIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7659. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 3 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L Parker can be reached at 303-297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER L AUGUSTIN/Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /JAMES WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772408
Server System Drive Mounting System Including a Riser Retention Bracket
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12754589
DISPLAY DEVICE AND FLEXIBLE FRAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753791
Hinge Mechanism and Electronic Device
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748468
SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743138
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND SLIDE MECHANISM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 564 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month