Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/171,427

VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 07, 2025
Priority
May 31, 2024 — JP 2024-088763
Examiner
NGUYEN, NGA X
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
619 granted / 797 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
829
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
79.8%
+39.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 797 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The current application related to a Foreign Application Priority JP-2024-088763 filed on May 31, 2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chikuma (20120247888) in view of Yoshimi (20140375001). With regard to claim 1, Chikuma discloses a vehicle control system comprising: a deceleration operation unit operated by a driver when a vehicle is to be decelerated (a brake pedal, see [0054]-[0055]+); a starting operation unit operated by the driver when the vehicle is to be started (accelerator pedal, see [0054]-[0055]+); suspensions interposed between a vehicle body of the vehicle and wheels (left and right front/rear wheel suspensions, see [0021]-[0022]+); and a control unit configured to control at least one of a damping force of the suspensions and a vehicle height of the vehicle, (a controller 37 controls drive of the actuator 20 of the damping force (the left and right front/rear wheel suspensions) mechanism 18,, see [0077]+, the vehicle’s height sensors are mounted on the wheels which are used to stabilize the posture of the vehicle body when the vehicle is running on a bad road, see [0107]+). Chikuma fails to teach when both the deceleration, and the acceleration are operated while the vehicle is stop, the controller performs controlling of the damping force, vehicle’s height. Yoshimi discloses a vehicle control system detects amount of depression of the accelerator and brake pedal, controls the stroke (damping force) corresponding the vehicle’s height, see [0030]-[0035]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Chikuma by including controlling the vehicle’s damping force, and height when detecting amount of depression of the accelerator and the braking as taught by Yoshimi for improving the vehicle’s driving smoothly. With regarding to claim 2, Chikuma teaches that the vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a detection unit configured to detect a physical quantity corresponding to an inclination angle of the vehicle body with respect to a horizontal plane (detecting a pitch state and roll of the vehicle body, see [0103]+) , wherein the control unit performs the change control processing when an absolute value of the inclination angle obtained by using the physical quantity detected by the detection unit is equal to or lower than a predetermined threshold (controller perform correcting a posture change such as a roll movement, a pitch movement, and etc. to stabilize the posture of the vehicle body, see [0107]+) . With regarding to claim 3, Chikuma teaches that the vehicle control system according to claim 2, wherein the suspensions include a first suspension interposed between the vehicle body and a front wheel of the wheels and a second suspension interposed between the vehicle body and a rear wheel of the wheels (see [0022]+), and in the change control processing, the control unit increases a damping force of the first suspension and increases a damping force of the second suspension (the damping force adjustable with the frequency response unit 24, see [0022]). With regard to claims 4-6, Yoshimi teaches that the vehicle height adjustment device is performed for lowering the vehicle height, see [0030]-[0035] which meets the scope of the claims. With regarding to claim 7, Chikuma teaches that the vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a notification unit configured to present notification information notifying that setting in the vehicle is to be changed, wherein the control unit activates the notification unit and causes the notification unit to present the notification information when both the deceleration operation unit and the starting operation unit are operated while the vehicle is stopped (the map calculating unit output a characteristic line indicated value of a target damping force according to an extension/compression stroke and a sprung speed, see [0062]+). With regarding to claim 8, Chikuma teaches that the vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein the deceleration operation unit is a brake pedal, and the starting operation unit is an accelerator pedal (see [0055]+). With regarding to claim 9, Chikuma teaches that the vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle is a side-by-side vehicle (see Fig.1). With regard to claim 10, Chikuma discloses a vehicle control device comprising: a first input unit to which first information indicating an operation amount of a deceleration operation unit operated by a driver when a vehicle is to be decelerated is input; a second input unit to which second information indicating an operation amount of a starting operation unit operated by the driver when the vehicle is to be started is input; a third input unit to which third information indicating a vehicle speed of the vehicle is input (braking amoung, acceleration amount and rotational speed of each vehicle are detected and input into the controller 37, see [0054]-[0056]+); A control unit configured to control at least one of a damping force of suspensions interposed between a vehicle body of the vehicle and wheels and a vehicle height of the vehicle. Wherein the control unit performs change control processing before the vehicle starts, the change control processing changing one of the damping force and the vehicle height in a case where the one is controlled and changing both of the damping force and the vehicle height in a case where the both elements are controlled (a controller 37 includes a calculation unit 42 which calculates and control damping force characteristic between the hard side and the soft side in a continuous manner or a stepwise manner (see [0057]-[0058]+) Chikuma fails to teach determining when both the deceleration, and the acceleration are operated while the vehicle is stop, the controller performs controlling of the damping force, vehicle’s height. Yoshimi discloses a vehicle control system detects and determines amount of depression of the accelerator and brake pedal, controls the stroke (damping force) corresponding the vehicle’s height, see [0030]-[0035]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Chikuma by including controlling the vehicle’s damping force, and height when detecting amount of depression of the accelerator and the braking as taught by Yoshimi for improving the vehicle’s driving smoothly. Prior Arts Cited The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hirao (20190255903) discloses a suspension control apparatus mounted on a vehicle for controlling a vibration of the vehicle (see the abstract). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NGA X NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-5217. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30AM - 2:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JELANI SMITH can be reached at 571-270-3969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NGA X. NGUYEN Examiner Art Unit 3662 /NGA X NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679533
ATTITUDE CONTROL DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662213
AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF A MOTOR-ASSISTED BICYCLE TO ACHIEVE A DESIRED RIDE OBJECTIVE OF A RIDER
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641433
IDENTIFICATION OF REPLAYED MARITIME VOYAGES
4y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12619232
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DECOMPRESSING NEURAL NETWORK COEFFICIENTS
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612035
VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 10m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 797 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month