Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/171,585

INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 07, 2025
Examiner
LAMB, CHRISTOPHER RAY
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Faurecia Clarion Electronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
60%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
348 granted / 678 resolved
-10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhou (US 2024/0378009) Regarding claim 1: Zhou discloses: An information processing device (Fig. 8), comprising: a reception unit configured to receive external display unit information, which is information on a vertical width and a horizontal width of a display unit of an external terminal device (Fig. 8: 150 or 160; where as per Fig. 17A step S2102 it receives “screen display direction” information, which is information on the width and/or height); a screen generation unit configured to generate, based on the external display unit information, screen data of a screen to be displayed on the display unit of the external terminal device (e.g., starting from Fig. 17 step S2105); and a transmission unit configured to transmit, to the external terminal device, the screen data generated by the screen generation unit (Fig. 17A: S2108; paragraph 287) wherein the transmission unit is further configured to: transmit, upon occurrence of a target event, screen data generated by the screen generation unit to the external terminal device, the target event being an event requiring an alteration in a vertical width and/or a horizontal width of a screen displayed on the external display unit, the screen data including: screen data on a first content obtained by altering a size of a pre-alteration screen, which is the screen displayed on the external display unit when the target event occurs, corresponding to an altered vertical width and an altered horizontal width of the external display unit (paragraph 285; steps S2110-S2113); and screen data on a second content (as shown in, e.g., Fig. 9a(g), it might also have a second content B); and wherein the second content, generated in the external display unit, is displayed in a region due to a difference between a pre-altered vertical width and the corresponding post-altered vertical width displayed on the external display unit, and between a pre-altered horizontal width and the post-altered horizontal width of the external display unit (Fig. 17: S1220; Fig. 9a(g); paragraph 150). Regarding claim 2: Zhou discloses: further comprising a mode determination unit configured to determine a mode of a screen displayed on the external display unit from among a plurality of modes, wherein the screen generation unit is configured to generate the screen data based on the mode determined by the mode determination unit (Fig. 17A: step S2106). Regarding claim 3: Zhou discloses: wherein the plurality of modes include: a first mode in which a screen displayed on the external display unit is the same screen as a screen displayed on a display unit of the information processing device (Fig. 17: S2106, S2108); and a second mode in which the screen displayed on the external display unit is a different screen from the screen displayed on the display unit of the information processing device (Fig. 17: S2106, S2110). Regarding claim 4: Zhou discloses: wherein when, in an occasion of occurrence of the target event, the mode determined by the mode determination unit is the first mode, the second content is a content associated with the first content (as per Fig. 6B(e), where from the figure it is clearly associated). Regarding claim 5: Zhou discloses: wherein the occasion of occurrence of the target event is: an occasion of: identifying a longer horizontal width of the display unit of the information processing device than the vertical width thereof; and identifying a longer vertical width of the external display unit than the horizontal width thereof; or an occasion of: identifying a shorter horizontal width of the display unit of the information processing device than a vertical width thereof; and identifying a shorter vertical width of the external display unit than a horizontal width thereof (Fig. 17: S2105 or S2114, where by “screen display direction” it means portrait or landscape). Regarding claims 6-7: All elements positively recited have been identified with respect to earlier rejections. No further elaboration is necessary. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Park et al. (US 2009/0058885); Barrett et al. (US 2014/0118222); Kim et al. (US 2021/0142760); Heo et al. (US 2018/0122328). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER RAY LAMB whose telephone number is (571)272-5264. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER R LAMB/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597397
IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE AND IMAGE DISPLAY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588388
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583321
INTEGRATED SLIDE-OUT VEHICLE WORK SURFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12547262
ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12535903
Display Apparatus Having a Connecting Electrode which Crosses a Bending Area
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
60%
With Interview (+9.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month