Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/171,974

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING PROGRESSIVE WEB APPLICATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 07, 2025
Priority
Apr 19, 2024 — CN 202410479680.3
Examiner
STEINLE, ANDREW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
495 granted / 565 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
573
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The use of the trademark ANDROID [paragraph 0070], has been noted in this application. It should be capitalized wherever it appears and be accompanied by the generic terminology. Although the use of trademarks is permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner which might adversely affect their validity as trademarks. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 10, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Seksenov et al., (US 20190163453 A1) hereinafter referred to as Seksenov. Regarding Claim 10, Seksenov discloses A method for providing a progressive web application, comprising: acquiring, in response to a request sent by a browser, web application configuration information of a first website visited by the browser; [paragraph 0024, Starting with block 202, PWA web crawler component 112 can retrieve a web page that is part of its list of web pages “to visit” (i.e., its “crawl frontier”) as defined by the component's crawling policies. The specific nature of these crawling policies will vary depending on the web crawler's implementation] determining preset field information, wherein the preset field information comprises at least one of: display mode information, an application packaging unique identifier, or target control state information; [paragraph 0027, On the other hand, if PWA web crawler component 112 determines at block 204 that both the web app manifest and service worker are present, component 112 can move on to determining whether the web app manifest is a new/unique manifest (i.e., a web app manifest that it has not encountered before), or an existing web app manifest that has been updated since the last version (block 206)] generating, based on the web application configuration information and the preset field information, an application package of a progressive web application of the first website; and sending the application package to the browser. [paragraph 0033, component 114 can convert the PWA into a native application for the OS of application store 116 (block 312). As indicated previously, a “native application” for a given OS is an application that has been specifically developed and/or compiled to run on that OS. The details of this conversion process will vary depending on the target OS, but it can generally involve (1) translating the JSON-based web app manifest (and in some cases, the service worker code) into an appropriate structured data or binary format understood by the target OS, and (2) downloading data files (e.g., icon images, etc.) used by the PWA and including the data files into the converted native application package] Regarding Claim 12, Seksenov discloses wherein determining the preset field information comprises: determining, based on a type of the progressive web application of the first website, the display mode information. [Table 00001 and Table 00002] Regarding Claim 13, Seksenov discloses further comprising: specifying, in project code of the progressive web application, a package name of a target application, such that the progressive web application is capable of being associated with the target application when being run. [paragraph 0033, component 114 can convert the PWA into a native application for the OS of application store 116 (block 312). As indicated previously, a “native application” for a given OS is an application that has been specifically developed and/or compiled to run on that OS. The details of this conversion process will vary depending on the target OS, but it can generally involve (1) translating the JSON-based web app manifest (and in some cases, the service worker code) into an appropriate structured data or binary format understood by the target OS, and (2) downloading data files (e.g., icon images, etc.) used by the PWA and including the data files into the converted native application package] Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding Claim 11, the closest prior art of record does not explicitly teach nor suggest in detail the limitations of the claim in view of other limitations of the intervening claims. Thus the prior arts of record taking singly or in combination do not teach or suggest the above-stated limitations taking wholly in combination with all the elements of each independent claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 14-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding Claims 1 and 14, although the closest prior art of record (such as Seksenov et al., (US 20190163453 A1) and Huang (CN 116048617 B)) teaches A method for providing a progressive web application, comprising: determining whether a first website visited by a user through a browser supports the progressive web application; in accordance with a determination that the first website supports the progressive web application, sending a request to an application packaging service in response to a preset operation of the user. However, none of the prior art, alone or in combination teaches such that the application packaging service generates, based on preset field information and web application configuration information of the first website, an application package of the progressive web application of the first website; acquiring the application package; and installing the progressive web application of the first website based on the application package in view of other limitations of the independent claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW J STEINLE whose telephone number is (571)272-9923. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eleni Shiferaw can be reached at (571) 272-3867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW J STEINLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2497
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750224
TOKEN-BASED REMOTE LOGIN USING ATTRIBUTE-BASED ENCRYPTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732385
AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, AUTHENTICATION MODULE, AND AUTHENTICATION PROGRAM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726335
TECHNIQUES FOR NON-VOLATILE DATA PROTECTION
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719669
5G KEY GENERATION / ECC KEY GENERATION AND SUCI CALCULATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12711273
PSEUDONYMISATION METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING THE METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.4%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month