Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/172,368

Method for Managing Application Icon, Terminal Device, and Storage Medium

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 07, 2025
Priority
Dec 25, 2020 — CN 202011564302.3 +2 more
Examiner
PATEL, JITESH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honor Device Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
324 granted / 411 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
425
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
62.0%
+22.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 411 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. US12282649B2 in view of Kim et al (US 20130055387 A1). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because, although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because this application is a continuation of 17/924,005 and this application claims with more words but in a broader manner the invention concisely claimed in 17/924,005. The claims map to each other as follows: Instant Application U.S. Patent No. US12282649B2 Claim 14 A method, comprising: displaying a desktop including a first icon grid, wherein the first icon grid comprises at least one rectangular circle centered on a center of the first icon grid and is formed by arranging application icons in a grid manner; installing a target application; displaying an application icon corresponding to the target application at a first starting position if a free position for an application icon does not exist in the at least one rectangular circle, wherein the first starting position is a position on a new rectangular circle located outside the first icon grid and adjacent to the first icon grid; and adding, if the free position for an application icon exists in the at least one rectangular circle, Claim 1 A method, comprising: adding, if a free position exists in a plurality of rectangular circles in an icon grid, a target application icon corresponding to a target application at the free position, wherein the icon grid is formed by arranging all current application icons of a terminal device in a grid manner, and wherein the rectangular circles are centered on a center of the icon grid; displaying a first desktop that comprises part of the application icons of the icon grid; receiving a first desktop switching operation from a user; switching from displaying the first desktop to displaying a second desktop in response to the first desktop switching operation, wherein the second desktop comprises all the application icons in the icon grid; receiving a second desktop switching operation performed by the user; and switching from displaying the second desktop to displaying the first desktop in response to the second desktop switching operation. Claim 15 Claim 2 Claim 16 Claim 3 Claim 17 Claim 4 Claim 18 Claim 3 Claim 19 Claim 4 Claim 20 Claim 9 Claim 1 Claim 15 Claim 1 in view of U.S. Patent No. US12282649B2 does not disclose the application icon of the target application according to a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction starting from a second starting position, wherein the second starting position is a starting position of the rectangular circle with the free position. However, Kim discloses the application icon of the target application according to a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction starting from a second starting position, wherein the second starting position is a starting position of the rectangular circle with the free position (Kim figs. 7A-B; [0089], “a new security risk icon may be added and may be arranged in a clockwise direction around an application icon, as indicated by arrow 701. Although not illustrated, the new security risk icon may be added and arranged in a counterclockwise direction,”). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify US12282649B2 with Kim to enable a feature to add icons in a counterclockwise direction. This would have been done to add icons in a visually pleasing manner. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the double patenting rejections set forth in this Office. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, Liang (US 20150026617 A1) discloses Install a target application (Liang [0038], "installing a new application; and after the new application is installed successfully, sending the managing module an icon management message corresponding to the installation (when a target application is installed on a terminal device)"; fig. 5 (exemplary target closed circle in a plurality of closed circles, in a direction from inside to outside in an icon grid); [0123], "it is determined whether there is enough space remaining in a screen for storing the icon of the new application"). wherein the icon grid is formed by arranging all current application icons of the terminal device in a grid manner, the closed circles are rectangular circles centered on a center of the icon grid (Crosley - Figure reads on an icon grid that is formed by arranging all current application icons of the terminal device in a grid manner, the closed circles are rectangular circles centered on a center of the icon grid). Kim discloses the application icon of the target application according to a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction starting from a second starting position, wherein the second starting position is a starting position of the rectangular circle with the free position (Kim figs. 7A-B; [0089], “a new security risk icon may be added and may be arranged in a clockwise direction around an application icon, as indicated by arrow 701. Although not illustrated, the new security risk icon may be added and arranged in a counterclockwise direction,”). However, none of the prior art of record, alone or in combination, disclose the claim as recited as a whole. Claims 2-13 are allowed for depending from claim 1. Claim 14 is allowed similar to claim 1 for reciting similar subject matter as claim 1. Claims 15-20 are allowed for depending from claim 14. Conclusion See the notice of references cited (PTO-892) for prior art made of record, including art that is not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JITESH PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-3313. The examiner can normally be reached 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Said A. Broome can be reached at (571) 272-2931. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JITESH PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12710687
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND IMAGE MAPPING METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12708445
MOBILE VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEM FOR SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704936
USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS FOR FACILITATING DIRECT-TOUCH AND INDIRECT HAND INTERACTIONS WITH A USER INTERFACE PRESENTED WITHIN AN ARTIFICIAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENT, AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693736
AUGMENTED REALITY AND SCREEN IMAGE RENDERING COORDINATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694580
GENERATIVE AI TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTING STYLE OF A SPACE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 411 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month