DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 2-4 and 6-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 2 recites the limitation "the plurality of auditory stimuli" in page 1 lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 3 recites the limitation “the complexity of the speech structures" in page 1 line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 4 recites the limitations “the user” and “the complexity of the speech structures" in page 1 lines 1, 3, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 6 recites the limitation “the user” in page 1 line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 7 recites the limitations “the user” and “the correctness of the user’s judgement" in page 1 lines 4-6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 8 recites the limitation “the user’s choice” in page 2 lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 9 recites the limitation “the sound stimulus” in page 2 line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 10 recites the limitation “the user” in page 2 line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 11 recites the limitation “the tweaked voice replica” in page 2 line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 13 recites the limitation “the first tweaked voice replica” in page 2 lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 14 recites the limitations “the tweaked voice replica” and “the user” in page 2 line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claims 8-14 are directly/indirectly depending on claim 7; therefore, they are rejected for the same reasons set forth in claim 7 above.
Double Patenting
The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b).
The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp.
Claims 1-12 and 14 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-6 and 12-14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,294,835. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-6 and 12-14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,294,835 are clearly anticipated or similar in scope to the rejected claims 1-12 and 14 of the U. S. Pat. App (No. 19/173,270) with only obvious wording variations. For example below:
Instant application
Claim Number
U.S. Patent No. 12,294,835
Claim Number
1
1, 3, 12, 14
2
4, 5, 13
3
15
4
1
5
2
6
12
7
1, 3, 8
8
2
9
4
10
5
11
6
12
1
14
3, 14
As shown in table above, the limitations in claims 1-12 and 14 of pending Application can be found the limitations in claims 1-6 and 12-14 as indicated above of U.S. Patent No. 12,294,835. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would recognize that they are not patentably distinct from each other. Accordingly, claims 1-12 and 14 of pending Application are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-6 and 12-14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,294,835 for the reasons as stated above.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 1-14 are allowed if they overcome the nonstatutory double patenting rejections and 112 2nd rejections above.
Claim 13 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, because the prior art of record fails to teach the limitation of claim 13 “further comprising providing a second tweaked voice replica, the second tweaked voice replica wherein the emotion of the first tweaked voice replica is different from the emotion of the second tweaked voice replica.”. Therefore, the prior art teachings are neither anticipate nor render obvious the allowable subject matter in combination with the other claimed limitations.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN DUC NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8163. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30-3:00 PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on 571-272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/TUAN D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
