Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/173,381

HEARING DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SOUND ENHANCEMENT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Priority
May 29, 2020 — provisional 63/031,943 +2 more
Examiner
ADDY, THJUAN KNOWLIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Starkey Laboratories Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
990 granted / 1108 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1120
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1108 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The invention as claimed is not disclosed nor rendered obvious in view of any prior art. As to independent claims 1 and 11, all prior art fail to teach or suggest, alone or in combination, the recited ear-wearable device and method. However, claims 1-20 are currently rejected under a nonstatutory double patenting rejection. A response is respectfully requested of Applicant. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-10 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,302,084. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,302,084 recites “An ear-wearable device, comprising: a persistent memory storing a plurality of neural network data objects each defining a respective neural network; a classifier that classifies an ambient environment of a digitized sound signal into one of a plurality of classifications … selects one of the neural network data objects to enhance the digitized sound signal … signal being reproduced via a receiver of the ear-wearable device”, and claim 1 of the present application recites “An ear-wearable device, comprising: a persistent memory storing a plurality of neural network data objects each defining a respective neural network; a digital signal processor comprising a neural network processor, the digital signal processor operable to: classify an ambient environment of a sound signal into one of a plurality of classifications; select one of the neural network data objects to enhance the sound signal based on the classification; load neural network data from the selected neural network data objects into a memory, wherein the neural network processor enhances the sound signal using the neural network data; and an audio processing circuit that reproduces the enhanced sound signal via a receiver of the ear-wearable device”. U.S. Patent 12,302,084 An ear-wearable device, comprising: a persistent memory storing a plurality of neural network data objects each defining a respective neural network; a classifier that classifies an ambient environment of a digitized sound signal into one of a plurality of classifications … Application 19/173,381 An ear-wearable device, comprising: a persistent memory storing a plurality of neural network data objects each defining a respective neural network; a digital signal processor comprising a neural network processor, the digital signal processor operable to: classify an ambient environment of a sound signal into one of a plurality of classifications … U.S. Patent 12,302,084 … selects one of the neural network data objects to enhance the digitized sound signal … Application 19/173,381 … select one of the neural network data objects to enhance the sound signal based on the classification … U.S. Patent 12,302,084 … signal being reproduced via a receiver of the ear-wearable device … Application 19/173,381 … and an audio processing circuit that reproduces the enhanced sound signal via a receiver of the ear-wearable device Claim 11 recites similar limitations as claim 1, therefore, claims 11-20 are also rejected under the nonstatutory double patenting rejection as claim 1 above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Patel et al. (US Patent Application, Pub. No.: US 2021/0266655 A1) teach a headset configuration management. Kulkarni et al. (US Patent Application, Pub. No.: US 2021/0312943 A1) teach a method and apparatus for target sound detection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THJUAN KNOWLIN ADDY whose telephone number is (571)272-7486. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM - 5:00PM Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached at (571) 272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THJUAN K ADDY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739543
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MOUNTING DEVICES TO A FLAT SCREEN VIDEO MONITOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12707189
Display Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694341
CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS SUBSYSTEM FOR AUGMENTED HEARING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688875
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689862
HEARING AID CONTROL METHOD, AND HEARING AID DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1108 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month