Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/173,495

SPRAY HEAD SPRINKLER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Priority
Mar 18, 2021 — continuation of 12/296,353
Examiner
GORMAN, DARREN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hunter Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
981 granted / 1240 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1264
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1240 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed on April 8, 2025 is hereby acknowledged and has been placed of record. Please find attached a signed copy of the IDS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 139-158 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Robertson et al., US Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0334332. As to claim 139, Robertson (see, for example, the embodiment shown in Figs. 1-12) shows a spray nozzle (10) comprising: a lower member (14 and 12) and an upper member (16) rotatably coupled to the lower member to vary a size of an arc opening for water to exit the nozzle (see paragraph [0053]), the lower member and the upper member defining a path for the water to flow from a passage within the lower member (as shown in Fig. 5), through an orifice (for example, as defined between 55 and 32), and then to an exit (for example, where the arrows commence exiting the nozzle, as shown in Fig. 5) of the nozzle, the exit comprising opposing surfaces of the upper member and the lower member (see again, Fig. 5), the upper member comprising one or more ramps (as defined on each of 60) having a convex surface (see Figs. 8-12). As to claim 140, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the convex surface is a curved surface (inclusive of 70d; see Fig. 11). As to claim 141, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the convex surface comprises at least one arc (inclusive of 70d, as a “curved” surface is reasonably an arc-shaped surface; see Fig. 11) As to claim 142, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the convex surface comprises at least one line segment (for example, 70a, 70b, 70c; see Fig. 11). As to claim 143, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the convex surface comprises three line segments (70a, 70b, 70c; see Fig. 11). As to claim 144, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 143, and wherein the three line segments are configured as a head water ramp, a mid-level ramp, and a radial ramp, respectively (70a, 70b, 70c; see Fig. 11). It should be noted that the terms “head water ramp”, “mid-level ramp”, and “radial ramp” can be treated as merely names of such ramp portions, since neither the originally-filed disclosure, nor the claims define such terms in a manner which would preclude surfaces, such as “70a”, 70b” and “70c” of Robertson, from being reasonably applied to each of the recited “ramp” elements. As to claim 145, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 143, and wherein at least two of the three line segments have different lengths (such as 70b, as compared to 70c; see Fig. 11). As to claim 146, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the upper member follows a helical path about a central axis of the nozzle (see Fig. 12) when rotated relative to the lower member. As to claim 147, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the upper member and the lower member are connected by a screw (18). As to claim 148, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 147, and wherein the lower member includes a central sleeve (26) through which the screw is threaded. As to claim 149, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 139, and wherein the lower member has a threaded segment (40) configured to screw to a riser. As to claim 150, Robertson (see, for example, the embodiment shown in Figs. 1-12) shows a spray nozzle (10) comprising: a lower member (14 and 12) having an inlet; an upper member (16) rotatably coupled to the lower member to vary a size of an arc opening for water to exit the nozzle (see paragraph [0053]), the upper member comprising one or more ramps (as defined on each of 60) having a convex surface (see Figs. 8-12); a flow path defined by the lower member and the upper member for the water to flow from the inlet to the arc opening (see Fig.5); an orifice (for example, as defined between 55 and 32) disposed along the flow path and downstream from the inlet (see again, Fig. 5); and an exit (for example, where the arrows commence exiting the nozzle, as shown in Fig. 5) disposed downstream of the orifice and comprising the one or more ramps (see again, Fig. 5). As to claim 151, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 150, and wherein the convex surface comprises at least one line segment (for example, 70a, 70b, 70c; see Fig. 11) and at least one arc (inclusive of 70d, as a “curved” surface is reasonably an arc-shaped surface; see Fig. 11). As to claim 152, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 150, and wherein the convex surface extends in a radial direction away from a central axis of the nozzle (see Fig. 12). As to claim 153, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 150, and wherein at least a portion of the convex surface extends parallel to a direction of the water exiting the nozzle (see Fig. 5). As to claim 154, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 150, and wherein the exit is configured to create a fan-shape for the water exiting the nozzle (the adjustable arc spray created by the nozzle of Robertson would reasonably be called “fan” shaped in at least one adjusted configuration). As to claim 155, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 150, and wherein the upper member follows a helical path about a central axis of the nozzle (see Fig. 12) when rotated relative to the lower member. As to claim 156, Robertson (see, for example, the embodiment shown in Figs. 1-12) shows a spray nozzle (10) comprising: an inlet (as defined in the upstream end portion of 12 and 14) for water to enter the nozzle; an arc opening (see Fig. 5; and see paragraph [0053]) for water to exit the nozzle; a flow path defined by the nozzle for the water to flow from the inlet to the arc opening (see again, Fig. 5); an orifice (for example, as defined between 55 and 32) disposed along the flow path (see again, Fig. 5); an exit (for example, where the arrows commence exiting the nozzle, as shown in Fig. 5) disposed downstream of the orifice and comprising an upper surface (as defined on 16) and a lower surface (as defined on 14); and one or more ramps (as defined on each of 60) disposed on the upper surface and having a convex shape (see Figs. 8-12). As to claim 157, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 156, and wherein the convex shape is curved (see, for example, at 70d). As to claim 158, Robertson shows the spray nozzle of Claim 156, and wherein the convex shape is configured as a head water ramp, a mid-level ramp, and a radial ramp (for example, 70a, 70b, 70c; see Fig. 11). It should be noted that the terms “head water ramp”, “mid-level ramp”, and “radial ramp” can be treated as merely names of such ramp portions, since neither the originally-filed disclosure, nor the claims define such terms in a manner which would preclude surfaces, such as “70a”, 70b” and “70c” of Robertson, from being reasonably applied to each of the recited “ramp” elements. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DARREN W GORMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4901. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DARREN W GORMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746421
FIRE TRUCK CHASSIS WITH POWER-CONSERVING ELECTRIC PUMP SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740553
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING A BOOM ASSEMBLY OF AN AGRICULTURAL APPLICATOR
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741480
GRIP FOR A WRITING IMPLEMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734383
DRY PIPE ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727592
AGRICULTURAL SPRAYER BOOM TRUSS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 5m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1240 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month