Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/173,550

PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD INCLUDING FIXING PART AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Priority
Oct 17, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0133209 +2 more
Examiner
MAHONEY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
905 granted / 1091 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1091 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Korea on October 17, 2022 and November 8, 2022. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copies of the Korean applications as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the first recessed portion and a second recessed portion formed at the edge of the sensor part must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). Additionally, a fourth recessed portion spaced apart from the second recessed portion formed at the edge of the fixing part such that the second portion is disposed between the third recessed portion and the fourth recessed portion must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 25-26 and 33-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claims 25 and 33, the first recessed portion and a second recessed portion formed at the edge of the sensor part is not disclosed as originally filed. The recessed portions are disclosed as being on the fixing part. The only recess discussed is in paragraphs 79 and 151 of the specification. Regarding claims 26 and 34, a fourth recessed portion spaced apart from the second recessed portion formed at the edge of the fixing part such that the second portion is disposed between the third recessed portion and the fourth recessed portion is not disclosed in the originally filed specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-24, 27-32 and 35-37 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sommer (U.S. Publication No. 20220053136). Sommer teaches an electronic device 100 comprising: a housing 138; and a printed circuit board 200 disposed in the housing, wherein the printed circuit board includes: a sensor part (108/122, fig. 1) including a first portion formed at an edge of the sensor part (204, fig 2A); a fixing part 126/206 coupled to the housing (fig. 2A, outer frame 126/206 is a “static platform” according to ¶¶24 and 26. Additionally, fig. 1 shows the outer frame 126 is attached to the housing 138), the fixing part including a second portion formed at an edge of the fixing part facing with the edge of the sensor part (inner edge of 206) and spaced apart from the first portion; and a flexible part 124/208 disposed between the sensor part and the fixing part such that the at least a portion of the flexible part surrounds at least a portion of the sensor part (figs. 1-2A). Regarding claim 22, the method of making does not impart specific structure and the structure as claimed is anticipated by Sommer. Regarding claim 23, a driving part (coils 132) is configured to move in at least one direction, wherein the sensor part is configured to move in the at least one direction according to a movement of the driving part (¶24) based on that the connection part is cut. The cut/gap between 206 and 204 allow movement. Regarding claim 24, a driving part (coils 132) configured to move in at least one direction, wherein the second portion does not limit a movement of the first portion according to a movement of the driving part. See fig. 1 and ¶24. Regarding claim 27, fig 2A shows the flexible part includes a first flexible portion disposed between a first portion of the sensor part and a first portion of the fixing part (i.e. top parts respectively), and a second flexible portion disposed between a second portion opposite to the first portion of the sensor part and a second portion opposite to the first portion of the fixing part (i.e. bottom parts respectively). Regarding claim 28, the printed circuit board includes a connector 212 (see also, connector at bottom of 206 in fig. 2A) connected with at least a portion of the fixing part and configured to be electrically connected between the printed circuit board and an electronic component disposed outside the printed circuit board. See also ¶26. Regarding claim 29, ¶26 teaches the flexible part includes a conductor configured to allow a current to flow therein. (“one or more electrical traces may be routed at one or both sides of suspension assembly 200, e.g., together with flexure arms 208, from conductor pads 212 (of outer frame 206) to conductor pads 210 (of inner frame 210).” Regarding claim 30, a bottom cover 114 is disposed under the printed circuit board. See fig. 1. Regarding claim 31, Sommer teaches a printed circuit board, disposed in a housing 138, including: a sensor part (108/122, fig. 1) including a first portion formed at an edge of the sensor part (204, fig 2A); a fixing part 126/206 coupled to the housing (fig. 2A, outer frame 126/206 is a “static platform” according to ¶¶24 and 26. Additionally, fig. 1 shows the outer frame 126 is attached to the housing 138), the fixing part including a second portion formed at an edge of the fixing part facing with the edge of the sensor part (inner edge of 206) and spaced apart from the first portion; and a flexible part 124/208 disposed between the sensor part and the fixing part such that the at least a portion of the flexible part surrounds at least a portion of the sensor part (figs. 1-2A). Regarding claim 32, the method of making does not impart specific structure and the structure as claimed is anticipated by Sommer. Regarding claim 35, fig 2A shows the flexible part includes a first flexible portion disposed between a first portion of the sensor part and a first portion of the fixing part (i.e. top parts respectively), and a second flexible portion disposed between a second portion opposite to the first portion of the sensor part and a second portion opposite to the first portion of the fixing part (i.e. bottom parts respectively). Regarding claim 36, the printed circuit board includes a connector 212 (see also, connector at bottom of 206 in fig. 2A) connected with at least a portion of the fixing part and configured to be electrically connected between the printed circuit board and an electronic component disposed outside the printed circuit board. See also ¶26. Regarding claim 37, ¶26 teaches the flexible part includes a conductor configured to allow a current to flow therein. (“one or more electrical traces may be routed at one or both sides of suspension assembly 200, e.g., together with flexure arms 208, from conductor pads 212 (of outer frame 206) to conductor pads 210 (of inner frame 210).” Claim(s) 21-22 and 31-32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Johnson (U.S. Publication No. 2020/0314338). Regarding claims 21 and 31, Johnson teaches an electronic device 300 comprising: a housing (312/412/414 see figs. 3-4); and a printed circuit board 102 disposed in the housing, wherein the printed circuit board includes: a sensor part 106 including a first portion formed at an edge of the sensor part; a fixing part 104 coupled to the housing (¶37, “second frame may be coupled to a static platform”), the fixing part including a second portion formed at an edge of the fixing part facing with the edge of the sensor part and spaced apart from the first portion; and a flexible part 108 disposed between the sensor part and the fixing part such that the at least a portion of the flexible part surrounds at least a portion of the sensor part. See fig. 2. Regarding claims 22 and 32, the method of making does not impart specific structure and the structure as claimed is anticipated by Sommer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 25-26 and 33-34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Johnson (U.S. Publication No. 2020/0314338). Regarding claims 25 and 33, Johnson teaches the sensor part including a first recessed portion (see figs. 10A, 10B and 10F). While Johnson does not show a second recessed portion formed at the edge of the sensor part such that the first portion is disposed between the first recessed portion and the second recessed portion, figures 10A, 10B and 10F all only show one quarter section of the circuit. Since each circuit contains at least four flexure arm sets, there would be at least a second recess portion (as well as third and fourth recess portions) with the sensor part between the recess portions. Thus a second recess portion would be formed at least on a side opposite to that shown in fig. 10A). Alternatively, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to utilize four recesses for the purpose of keeping symmetry of the moving platform while increasing the number of conductors. The applicant should note that it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involve only routine skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). Regarding claims 26 and 34, the same reasoning applies as explain above with respect to claims 25 and 33. Figures 10A, 10B and 10F all only show one quarter section of the circuit. Since each circuit contains at least four flexure arm sets, there would be third and fourth recess portions. Thus third and fourth recess portions would be formed spaced apart from the first recessed portion and a fourth recessed portion spaced apart from the second recessed portion formed at the edge of the fixing part such that the second portion is disposed between the third recessed portion and the fourth recessed portion. These would be formed on left and right sides for example. Alternatively, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to utilize four recesses for the purpose of keeping symmetry of the moving platform while increasing the number of conductors. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hubert (U.S. Publication No. 20190141248) shows at least two recesses on the edge of a sensor part. See fig. 8A. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY whose telephone number is (571)272-2122. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at 571-272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2025
Application Filed
May 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748341
IMAGING LENS MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743001
IRIS MODULE AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736032
SMA ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736703
METAL DETECTOR UTILIZING ASYNCHRONOUS DEMODULATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736857
CLAMPING ASSEMBLY AND HANDHELD AUXILIARY PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVICE USING CLAMPING ASSEMBLY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.8%)
1y 12m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1091 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month