Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/174,664

SPILL-TO-DISK IN PROJECTION OPERATIONS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 09, 2025
Examiner
UDDIN, MOHAMMED R
Art Unit
2161
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
SAP SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
564 granted / 726 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the communication filed on April 15, 2025. Claims 21-35 are examined and are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 21-35 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,298,911 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are substantially similar in scope and they use the same limitations. Especially, the U.S. Patent No. 12,298,911 B2 discloses more details in logic assets with the application scenario. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to realize that claims 21-35 of the instant application is fully disclosed by the U.S. Patent No. 12,298,911 B2. The following table shows the claims in Instant Application that are rejected by corresponding claim(s) in U.S. Patent No. 12,298,911 B2. Instant Application: 19174664 Patent: 12298911 21. (New) A system, comprising: at least one data processor; and at least one memory result in operations comprising: in response to a query including a projection being processed by a processing thread, receiving a plurality of rows; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order for the plurality of rows and a disk buffer associated with the processing thread containing a stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer containing at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 22. (New) The system of claim 21, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory. 23. (New) The system of claim 21, wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 24. (New) The system of claim 21, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 25. (New) The system of claim 21, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. 26. (New) A computer-implemented method, comprising: in response to a query including a projection being processed by a processing thread, receiving a plurality of rows; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order for the plurality of rows and a disk buffer associated with the processing thread containing a stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer containing at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 27. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 26, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory. 28. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 26, wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 29. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 26, further comprising: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 30. (New) The computer-implemented method of claim 26, further comprising: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. 31. (New) A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions, which when executed by at least one data processor, result in operations comprising: in response to a query including a projection being processed by a processing thread, receiving a plurality of rows; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order for the plurality of rows and a disk buffer associated with the processing thread containing a stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer containing at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 32. (New) The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory. 33. (New) The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 34. (New) The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 35. (New) The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. 1. A system, comprising: at least one data processor; and at least one memory result in operations comprising: receiving a query including a projection; receiving a plurality of rows in response to the query processed by a processing thread of a plurality of processing threads; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order, determining whether a disk buffer associated with the processing thread contains a stored row; in response to determining the disk buffer contains the stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer contains at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory, and wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the providing comprises: consuming, by a fetching thread, the plurality of rows stored in the disk buffer and/or the memory buffer. 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the providing further comprises: determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the disk buffer prior to determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the memory buffer when the query specifies the order for the plurality of rows. 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the providing further comprises: determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the memory buffer prior to determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the disk buffer when the query specifies the order for the plurality of rows. 8. The system of claim 1, wherein a second processing thread of the plurality of processing threads stores a second plurality of rows in (a) a second disk buffer associated with the second processing thread in response to determining the second disk buffer contains a second stored row or (b) a second memory buffer associated with the second processing thread in response to determining the second disk buffer does not contain the second stored row and the second memory buffer contains at least a second threshold amount of memory to store the second plurality of rows. 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving a query including a projection; receiving a plurality of rows in response to the query processed by a processing thread of a plurality of processing threads; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order, determining whether a disk buffer associated with the processing thread contains a stored row; in response to determining the disk buffer contains the stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer contains at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory, and wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. 13. The method of claim 9, wherein the providing comprises: consuming, by a fetching thread, the plurality of rows stored in the disk buffer and/or the memory buffer. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the providing further comprises: determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the disk buffer prior to determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the memory buffer when the query specifies the order for the plurality of rows. 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the providing further comprises: determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the memory buffer prior to determining whether to consume the plurality of rows from the disk buffer when the query specifies the order for the plurality of rows. 16. The method of claim 9, wherein a second processing thread of the plurality of processing threads stores a second plurality of rows in (a) a second disk buffer associated with the second processing thread in response to determining the second disk buffer contains a second stored row or (b) a second memory buffer associated with the second processing thread in response to determining the second disk buffer does not contain the second stored row and the second memory buffer contains at least a second threshold amount of memory to store the second plurality of rows. 17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions, which when executed by at least one data processor, result in operations comprising: receiving a query including a projection; receiving a plurality of rows in response to the query processed by a processing thread of a plurality of processing threads; determining whether the query specifies an order for the plurality of rows; in response to the query specifying the order, determining whether a disk buffer associated with the processing thread contains a stored row; in response to determining the disk buffer contains the stored row, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer; in response to determining the disk buffer does not contain the stored row and a memory buffer contains at least a threshold amount of memory to store the plurality of rows, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer associated with the processing thread; and providing the stored plurality of rows in response to the query. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the disk buffer includes physical memory, and wherein the memory buffer includes in-memory storage. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the memory buffer. 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining the query does not specify the order, determining whether the memory buffer contains the threshold amount of memory; and in response to determining the memory buffer does not contain the threshold amount of memory, storing the plurality of rows in the disk buffer. “Omission of element and its function in combination is obvious expedient if the remaining elements perform same functions as before.” See In re Karlson (CCPA) 136 USPQ 184, decide Jan 16, 1963, Appl. No. 6857, U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED R UDDIN whose telephone number is (571)270-3138. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Beausoliel Robert can be reached at 571-272-3645. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED R UDDIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2161
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602432
SUMMARY GENERATION FOR A DISTRIBUTED GRAPH DATABASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596676
RECORDS RETENTION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596960
MISUSE INDEX FOR EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585890
System and Method for Image Generation Using Neuroscience-Inspired Prompt Strategy
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566800
EFFICIENT AND SCALABLE DATA PROCESSING AND MODELING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.8%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month