Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/175,425

SHEET FEEDING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Priority
May 13, 2024 — JP 2024-077915
Examiner
GONZALEZ, LUIS A
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
888 granted / 1047 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1081
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1047 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “wherein the sheet stacking portion is configured to be rotatable from the second position to the first position and not to be rotatable from the first position to the second position”. The underlined limitation is indefinite because it’s unclear how to interpret this claim limitation. As best understood, Applicant’s drawings show support for a sheet stacking portion (3) that is locked from movement by claw portion (8, refer to published application [0094]-[0097]) when rotating from the first position-FIG. 6A to the second position-Applicant intends to claim a packaged state, which is a non-use state in FIG. 8A). First, it appears that the sheet stacking portion is capable of rotation from a first position (shown in FIG. 6A) to a second position (FIG. 10a, never quite reaching Applicant’s intended second position because of the claw portion 8). Second, Applicant’s sheet stacking portion (3) appears capable of fully rotating back to the second position from the first by external manipulation of the claw portion by a user (to place the device in a non-use, packaged state). Correction is required. Note: For examination purposes, the examiner will treat the claims to require a sheet stacking portion that is rotatable from the second position to the first position (during use) and not rotatable from the first position to the second position (in use). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hisayoshi JP 2009-057175 A (hereinafter “Hisayoshi”). Regarding claims 1 and 5 (image forming apparatus-FIG. 1), Hisayoshi, with reference to FIGS. 4-9 and/or FIGS. 17-19, discloses a sheet feeding apparatus for feeding a sheet, comprising: a sheet tray (20) provided on a side wall portion of an apparatus main body of the sheet feeding apparatus, the sheet tray being configured to stack the sheet; and an extended sheet tray (72 and 73) attached to an upstream side of the sheet tray in a feeding direction the sheet, the extended sheet tray being configured to stack the sheet, wherein the extended sheet tray is provided with a sheet tray attaching portion (72) detachably attached to the sheet tray, and a sheet stacking portion (73) rotatably attached to the sheet tray attaching portion, the sheet stacking portion being configured to stack the sheet, wherein with the extended sheet tray is attached to the sheet tray, the sheet stacking portion is configured to be switchable between a first position (FIG. 6) in which the sheet stacking portion can stack the sheet and a second position (FIG. 8) that is closer to the apparatus main body than the first position, and wherein the sheet stacking portion is configured to be rotatable from the second position to the first position and not to be rotatable (during use, by use of 98a and 98b in FIG. 18) from the first position to the second position . Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUIS A GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3094. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUIS A GONZALEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630380
ROLLER PAIR FOR CONVEYING SHEETS AND PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630381
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623869
CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE OF OPTIONAL PAPER TRAY
1y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625455
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12614424
MEDIUM STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE MEDIUM STORAGE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+4.5%)
2y 1m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1047 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month