Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/175,741

METHOD FOR OPERATING POWER SYSTEM AND CONTROL APPARATUS FOR POWER SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Priority
Nov 02, 2022 — JP 2022-176013 +1 more
Examiner
AMAYA, CARLOS DAVID
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
915 granted / 1091 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1113
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1091 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
CTNF 19/175,741 CTNF 81990 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Objections 07-29-01 AIA Claim s 1, 2 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1 and 2 recite “and/or”; however, it is not clear if Applicant wishes the broader “or” interpretation or the narrower “and” interpretation. Claim 2 recites “fuel battery system”; however, it appears that it should read “fuel cell system” . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claims 1, 2 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 07-34-10 Regarding claims 1 and 2, the phrase "in such a way" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 07-07-aia AIA 07-07 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15-aia AIA Claim(s) 1, 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Jian et al. (CN 111953016) (Document Provided in the IDS of 1/21/2026) . With respect to claim 1, Jian discloses a method for operating a power system (multi-energy microgrid control method and system), the method comprising: planning an output of a fuel cell system in such a way as to make up a difference between power demand and an output of a solar power generation system (If Ppv_max < Pload, the fuel cell generator set and the photovoltaic cell generator set are required to generate electricity the power of the fuel cell generator set Pfc = Pload - Ppv_max), wherein, in the planning, if a charge level of a storage battery system is higher than or equal to an upper limit value smaller than 100%, first correction, in which the plan is corrected in such a way as to reduce the output of the fuel cell system, is performed (S3.2 If SOC ≥ SOCmax, excess power does not charge battery; PV provides load only; FC output follows load, so the FC output is reduced) and/or if the charge level of the storage battery system is lower than or equal to a lower limit value larger than 0%, second correction, in which the plan is corrected in such a way as to increase the output of the fuel cell system, is performed (S3.2 If SOC ≤ SOCmin, the fuel cell generator set and the photovoltaic cell generator set are both in the MPPT mode supply power and charge the battery until SOC ≥ SOCmax). With respect to claim 2, Jian discloses a control apparatus for a power system, the control apparatus comprising: a memory storing power demand and an output of a solar power generation system (control system 4 collects data and performs/judges a control of the system); and a controller (controller 4) that, when planning an output of a fuel cell system in such a way as to make up a difference between the power demand and the output of the solar power generation system (If Ppv_max < Pload, the fuel cell generator set and the photovoltaic cell generator set are required to generate electricity the power of the fuel cell generator set Pfc = Pload - Ppv_max), performs, if a charge level of a storage battery system is higher than or equal to an upper limit value smaller than 100%, first correction, in which the plan is corrected in such a way as to reduce the output of the fuel cell system (S3.2 If SOC ≥ SOCmax, excess power does not charge battery; PV provides load only; FC output follows load, so the FC output is reduced), and/or performs, if the charge level of the storage battery system is lower than or equal to a lower limit value larger than 0%, second correction, in which the plan is corrected in such a way as to increase the output of the fuel battery system (S3.2 If SOC ≤ SOCmin, the fuel cell generator set and the photovoltaic cell generator set are both in the MPPT mode supply power and charge the battery until SOC ≥ SOCmax) . Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Inoue et al. (US 12,407,166) discloses a plurality of distributed power supplies and controlling the distributed power supplies based on the capacities of the power supplies and power target values . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS AMAYA whose telephone number is (571)272-8941. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLOS AMAYA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836 Application/Control Number: 19/175,741 Page 2 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 19/175,741 Page 3 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 19/175,741 Page 4 Art Unit: 2836 Application/Control Number: 19/175,741 Page 5 Art Unit: 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749907
PPLUG-IN MOBILE PHONE CASE
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744394
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING FINDING FUNCTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744455
Adaptive Electrical Power Distribution Panel
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735969
ELECTRICALLY-DRIVEN FRACTURING SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738769
Contactless Power Feeder
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1091 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month