Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/175,876

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Priority
Apr 19, 2024 — JP 2024-068332
Examiner
LEIBY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Japan Display Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
629 granted / 1014 resolved
At TC average
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1049
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1014 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-14 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Okuyama (US Patent Application Publication 2019/0302523). Regarding independent claim 1, Okuyama discloses a display device (figures 17-19 DSP) comprising: a display panel (LC4) that has a display area (Figure 2 DA) in which a plurality of pixels (PX) are arranged in a first direction (Figure 2 X) and a second direction (Y) intersecting the first direction (X), and that is configured to make an image viewed in plan view ([0045] exampled configuration of an LCD display (corresponding to LC1, LC2, or LC4) in which an image is displayed) from one side (Figure 19 U1) of the display area visible from another side (U2) (Figures 18-19 depicts liquid crystal molecules LCH of LC4 aligned as pixels via control electrodes 73/731-735 below and control electrode 81 above (as oriented in the figure). Said figures depict the electrodes to correspond as pixels, [0106]. [0065] describes 30A to be an off area and 30B to be an on area (corresponding to pixels PX). Figure 19 and [0109]-[0117] describes control of the image via TC including: LCH vertical Z aligned (as oriented in the figure) allows light to pass through TC while LCH horizontal X alignment blocks light from passing through.); a first light control panel (PNL1) that is provided on one surface (SUB7) of the display panel (TC) and is configured to make at least a partial area of the display area invisible (The current application’s specification support for “invisible” is descried in reference to figure 12A such that an image/text displayed at A1, on DIM1, is made invisible by light blocking pattern S2 when view for direction dir2 and similarly, image/text displayed on A2, on DIM2, is made invisible by light blocking pattern S1. In view of the support, prior art Okuyama discloses in figure 19 image light DL2 on PNL1 at the area of 733 is in an off state 30A and DL2 light is not visible, invisible, to U1, [0114]); and a second light control panel (PNL2) that is provided on another surface (SUB8) of the display panel (TC) and is configured to make at least a partial area of the display area invisible (Figure 19 image light DL1 on PNL2 at the area of 732 is in an off state 30A and DL1 light is not visible, invisible, to U2, [0112]). Regarding claim 2, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first light control panel (PNL1) and the second light control panel (PNL2) is provided with an electrochromic layer overlapping the display area ([0100]). Regarding claim 3, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first light control panel (PNL1) and the second light control panel (PNL2) is provided with a liquid crystal layer (LC1/LC2) overlapping the display area (Overlap with LC4 depicted in figure 19). Regarding claim 4, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein an area (732) made visible by the first light control panel (PNL1) overlaps (depicted in figure 19) an area (732) made invisible by the second light control panel (PNL2) in a visual line direction (Z) (Figure 19 image light DL1 on PNL2 at the area of 732 is in an off state 30A and DL1 light is not visible, invisible, to U2, [0112]). Regarding claim 5, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein an area (733) made invisible by the first light control panel (PNL1) overlaps (depicted in figure 19) an area (733) made visible by the second light control panel (PNL2) in a visual line direction (Z) (figure 19 image light DL2 on PNL1 at the area of 733 is in an off state 30A and DL2 light is not visible, invisible, to U1, [0114]). Regarding claim 6, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein a first area (732) that is made visible by the first light control panel (PNL1) and made invisible by the second light control panel (PNL2) (Figure 19 image light DL1 on PNL2 at the area of 732 is in an off state 30A and DL1 light is not visible, invisible, to U2, [0112]) and a second area that is made invisible (733) by the first light control panel (PNL1) and made visible by the second light control panel (PNL2) (figure 19 image light DL2 on PNL1 at the area of 733 is in an off state 30A and DL2 light is not visible, invisible, to U1, [0114]) are alternately arranged in the first direction (X) and the second direction (Y) (Figure 19 depicts the off/on states 30A/30B may be specifically controlled including an alternate arrangement (732 adjacent 733).). Regarding claim 7, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 6, wherein each of the first area (732) and the second area (733) comprises at least one pixel (depicted in figure 18 PX) in the first direction (X), and each of the first area (732) and the second area (733) comprises at least one pixel (PX) in the second direction (Y) (depicted in figures 1-2). Regarding claim 8, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 7, wherein the first area (732) overlaps the second area (733) in a predetermined area including a boundary line between the first area (732) and the second area (733) in plan view (plan view depicted in figure 2, figure 19 depicts side view extending along x direction wherein a y direction between 732 and 733 may be interpreted as the boundary line.). Regarding claim 9, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein a first area (732) that is made visible by the first light control panel (PNL1) and made invisible by the second light control panel (PNL2) (Figure 19 image light DL1 on PNL2 at the area of 732 is in an off state 30A and DL1 light is not visible, invisible, to U2, [0112]) and a second area (733) that is made invisible by the first light control panel (PNL1) and made visible by the second light control panel (PNL2) (figure 19 image light DL2 on PNL1 at the area of 733 is in an off state 30A and DL2 light is not visible, invisible, to U1, [0114]) are alternately arranged in the first direction (X) (Figure 19 depicts the off/on states 30A/30B may be specifically controlled including an alternate arrangement (732 adjacent 733).). Regarding claim 10, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 9, wherein each of the first area (732) and the second area (733) comprises at least one pixel (PX) in the first direction (X) (figure 18 depicts each of 731-735 comprising a pixel PX). Regarding claim 11, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 10, wherein the first area (732) overlaps the second area (733) in a predetermined area including a boundary line between the first area (732) and the second area (733) in plan view (plan view depicted in figure 2, figure 19 depicts side view extending along x direction wherein a y direction between 732 and 733 may be interpreted as the boundary line.). Regarding claim 12, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein a first area (732) that is made visible by the first light control panel (PNL1) and made invisible by the second light control panel (PNL2) (Figure 19 image light DL1 on PNL2 at the area of 732 is in an off state 30A and DL1 light is not visible, invisible, to U2, [0112]) and a second area (733) that is made invisible by the first light control panel (PNL1) (figure 19 image light DL2 on PNL1 at the area of 733 is in an off state 30A and DL2 light is not visible, invisible, to U1, [0114]) and made visible by the second light control panel (PNL2) are alternately arranged in the second direction (Y) (Figure 19 depicts the off/on states 30A/30B may be specifically controlled including an alternate arrangement (732 adjacent 733).). Regarding claim 13, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 12, wherein the first area (732) and the second area (733) each comprise at least one pixel (PX) in the second direction (Y) (depicted in figures 1-2). Regarding claim 14, Okuyama discloses the display device according to claim 13, wherein the first area (732) overlaps the second area (733) in a predetermined area including a boundary line between the first area (732) and the second area (733) in plan view (plan view depicted in figure 2, figure 19 depicts side view extending along x direction wherein a y direction between 732 and 733 may be interpreted as the boundary line.). Conclusion 4. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Larry et al. (US Patent Application Publication 2020/0292904) depicts overlap arrangement in a Y direction (figure 3). Perdices-Gonzalez et al. (US Patent Application Publication 2017/0310956) depicts overlap between pixels of adjacent light control panels (figure 5). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E LEIBY whose telephone number is (571)270-3142. The examiner can normally be reached 11-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571-272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E LEIBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12754590
ROTATABLE CONTROL BUTTON ASSEMBLY FOR A WEARABLE DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749462
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743980
DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741536
DISPLAY DEVICE, DASHBOARD AND TRANSPORTATION MEANS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737046
WRITING INSTRUMENT
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1014 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month