Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/175,924

Device For Making Drinks

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Priority
Jan 18, 2024 — CIP of 18/415,817 +13 more
Examiner
MCCARTY, PATRICK M
Art Unit
1774
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sharkninja Operating LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
93 granted / 149 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
186
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 149 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments The objections to the drawings are withdrawn. The rejections of claims 5-6 and 11-13 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) are withdrawn. In response to Applicant’s filing of a terminal disclaimer, the previous double patenting rejections are withdrawn. The Applicant has amended claim 1 to incorporate previously indicated allowable subject matter. The rejections of claims 1 and 3-20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 35 U.S.C. 103 are withdrawn. However, rejections of new claims 21-22 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) follow below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Martin (US 2788643). Regarding claim 21, Martin discloses a device for making drinks (frozen milk, semi-solid, and the like, col. 1, lines 15-18) as shown below: PNG media_image1.png 990 1505 media_image1.png Greyscale Martin discloses the device comprises a housing (such as comprising stainless steel lower freezer chamber wall 38, col. 2, lines 20-25, freezer chamber 22, storage compartment 16 and other components located or supported below upper cylindrical portion 30, Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, shown above); a mixing vessel configured to receive a drink product (upper cylindrical wall 30); a drive motor positioned in the housing (motor 74, Fig. 1); a dasher (auger 80) configured to mix the drink product in the mixing vessel, the dasher driven by the drive motor (motor 74 via gear unit 68, Fig. 1), wherein the mixing vessel has an opening (adjacent to gasket 42, Fig. 1) through which the dasher is driven when the mixing vessel is engaged with the housing in an engaged position (Fig. 1, drive shaft 66 extends through the lower opening of upper cylindrical wall 30 and attaches/transmits power to the dasher/auger at threaded knob 84 as indicated by key 78 and ball bearing 64); a cooling circuit (comprising cooling coils 50 for refrigerant, col. 3, line 46) at least partly positioned in the housing (Fig. 1), the cooling circuit configured to cool the drink product while the drink product is mixed in the mixing vessel; and a coupling mechanism (slotted flange 44 on the mixing vessel/cylindrical wall 30 and swing bolts 46 with wing nuts 48, col. 2, lines 30-42) configured to releasably retain the mixing vessel against the housing in the engaged position (Fig. 1), wherein the mixing vessel is configured to engage the housing to seal the opening when in the engaged position, wherein the coupling mechanism is configured to rotate (swing bolts rotate: “swing into the slotted flanges”, col. 1, lines 36-37) and engage at least one mating feature of the mixing vessel (slotted flange 44), and wherein the coupling mechanism is further configured to apply a compressive force to seal the opening of the mixing vessel (“pressure exerted by the wing nuts…..draws wall 30 down onto gasket 42”, col. 2, lines 37-38). Regarding claim 22, Martin discloses a device for making drinks shown above for claim 21. Martin discloses the device comprises: a housing (shown above for claim 21); a mixing vessel (upper cylindrical portion/wall 30) configured to receive a drink product; a drive motor (motor 74, Fig. 1) positioned in the housing; a dasher (auger 80) configured to mix the drink product in the mixing vessel, the dasher driven by the drive motor, wherein the mixing vessel has an opening (opening at gasket 42, Fig. 1, annotated above for claim 21) through which the dasher is driven when the mixing vessel is engaged with the housing in an engaged position (Fig. 1, drive shaft 66 extends through the lower opening of upper cylindrical wall 30 and attaches/transmits power to the dasher/auger at threaded knob 84 as indicated by key 78 and ball bearing 64); a cooling circuit (comprising cooling coils 50 for refrigerant, col. 3, line 46) at least partly positioned in the housing (Fig. 1), the cooling circuit configured to cool the drink product while the drink product is mixed in the mixing vessel; and a coupling mechanism (slotted flange 44 on the mixing vessel/cylindrical wall 30 and swing bolts 46 with wing nuts 48, col. 2, lines 30-42) configured to releasably retain the mixing vessel against the housing in the engaged position (Fig. 1), wherein the mixing vessel is configured to engage the housing to seal the opening (at gasket 42) when in the engaged position (Fig. 1), wherein the coupling mechanism is a rotatable lock (swing bolts rotate: “swing into the slotted flanges”, col. 1, lines 36-37) configured to engage at least one protrusion of the mixing vessel (flange 44 is a protrusion, Fig. 1, and has a slot for receiving the swing bolt 46), and wherein the coupling mechanism is further configured to apply a compressive force to seal the opening of the mixing vessel (at least using wing nuts 42: “pressure exerted by the wing nuts…..draws wall 30 down onto gasket 42”, col. 2, lines 37-38). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record discloses devices for making drinks having a housing, mixing vessels, a dasher in the mixing vessel powered by a motor, an evaporator, and coupling mechanisms configured to releasably retain the mixing vessel against the housing. However, the prior art of record did not reasonably disclose, teach or otherwise suggest a device for making drinks having a housing, a mixing vessel, a dasher received through an opening in the mixing vessel and powered by a motor, a cooling circuit in the housing for cooling a drink in the mixing vessel, a coupling mechanism configured to releasably retain the mixing vessel against the housing in an engaged position where the mixing vessel is configured to engage the housing to seal the opening in the mixing vessel and wherein the coupling mechanism comprises at least one cam. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK M MCCARTY whose telephone number is (571)272-4398. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Claire Wang can be reached at 571-270-1051. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /P.M.M./Examiner, Art Unit 1774 /CLAIRE X WANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685978
FOLDABLE AGITATOR
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678753
MAGNETIC SELF-STIRRER
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12649130
Mixing Device
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643059
SLURRY STORING AND MIXING DEVICE
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636628
Electrically Driven Oilfield Blender System
4y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 5m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month