Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 19/176,219

Virtual Reality System With Posture Control

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 11, 2025
Examiner
ILUYOMADE, IFEDAYO B
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
464 granted / 630 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
657
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
56.8%
+16.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 5-6, 8, 11-13, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 11099631. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the systems of this application contains similar structures adequate to perform the functions recited in the patent application. The claims are as follows with the differences highlighted: 19176219 11099631 With reference to claim 1: A method, comprising: obtaining a posture signal indicative of a posture of a user of a virtual reality display system; and outputting a field of view of a virtual reality scene to the virtual reality display system, wherein the field of view is a motion tracked field of view when the posture signal corresponds to good posture and the field of view is a moved field of view when the posture signal corresponds to bad posture. With reference to claim 1: A method for outputting fields of view of a virtual reality system according to postures of a user of the virtual reality system, the method comprising: outputting a field of view to a display of the virtual reality system such that the field of view corresponds to a tracked motion of a head of the user; detecting, using a sensor of the virtual reality system, a posture of the user; and upon determining that the posture of the user is not acceptable, altering the field of view based on the posture of the user such that the field of view differs from the tracked motion of the head of the user. With reference to claim 15: A content display method for a head-mounted display, comprising: tracking a location and an attitude for a head of a user; determining a head-tracked field of view relative to a scene, wherein the head-tracked field of view corresponds to the location and the attitude for the head of the user; detecting a posture of the user; determining whether the posture of the user is acceptable; in response to determining that the posture of the user is acceptable, displaying content to the user according to the head-tracked field of view; and in response to determining that the posture of the user is unacceptable: determining an altered field of view that deviates from the head-tracked field of view according to the posture of the user, and displaying content to the user according to the altered field of view. Claim 1 of this application is being anticipated by claims 1 and 15 of patent 11099631 with similar variation in the non-highlighted limitation above. 19176219 11099631 With reference to claim 9: A system, comprising: a memory; and a processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to: obtain a posture signal indicative of a posture of a user of a virtual reality display system, and output a field of view of a virtual reality scene to the virtual reality display system, wherein the field of view is a motion tracked field of view when the posture signal corresponds to good posture and the field of view is a moved field of view when the posture signal corresponds to bad posture. With reference to claim 8: An apparatus for outputting fields of view of a virtual reality system according to postures of a user of the virtual reality system, the apparatus comprising: a computing device that includes a memory and a processor that is configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to: transmit data indicative of a first field of view that corresponds to a tracked motion of a head of the user, receive data indicative of a posture of the user from a sensor of the virtual reality system, and transmit data indicative of a second field of view in response to the data indicative of the posture of the user, wherein the second field of view differs from the first field of view based on a difference between the posture of the user and an acceptable posture. With reference to claim 15: A content display method for a head-mounted display, comprising: tracking a location and an attitude for a head of a user; determining a head-tracked field of view relative to a scene, wherein the head-tracked field of view corresponds to the location and the attitude for the head of the user; detecting a posture of the user; determining whether the posture of the user is acceptable; in response to determining that the posture of the user is acceptable, displaying content to the user according to the head-tracked field of view; and in response to determining that the posture of the user is unacceptable: determining an altered field of view that deviates from the head-tracked field of view according to the posture of the user, and displaying content to the user according to the altered field of view. Claim 9 of this application is being anticipated by claims 8 and 15 of patent 11099631 with similar variation in the non-highlighted limitation above. 19176219 11099631 With reference to claim 15: A non-transitory computer-readable storage device including computer interpretable program instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining a posture signal indicative of a posture of a user of a virtual reality display system; and outputting a field of view of a virtual reality scene to the virtual reality display system, wherein the field of view is a motion tracked field of view when the posture signal corresponds to good posture and the field of view is a moved field of view when the posture signal corresponds to bad posture. With reference to claim 15: A content display method for a head-mounted display, comprising: tracking a location and an attitude for a head of a user; determining a head-tracked field of view relative to a scene, wherein the head-tracked field of view corresponds to the location and the attitude for the head of the user; detecting a posture of the user; determining whether the posture of the user is acceptable; in response to determining that the posture of the user is acceptable, displaying content to the user according to the head-tracked field of view; and in response to determining that the posture of the user is unacceptable: determining an altered field of view that deviates from the head-tracked field of view according to the posture of the user, and displaying content to the user according to the altered field of view. With reference to claim 8: An apparatus for outputting fields of view of a virtual reality system according to postures of a user of the virtual reality system, the apparatus comprising: a computing device that includes a memory and a processor that is configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to: transmit data indicative of a first field of view that corresponds to a tracked motion of a head of the user, receive data indicative of a posture of the user from a sensor of the virtual reality system, and transmit data indicative of a second field of view in response to the data indicative of the posture of the user, wherein the second field of view differs from the first field of view based on a difference between the posture of the user and an acceptable posture. Claim 15 of this application is being anticipated by claims 8 and 15 of patent 11099631 with similar variation in the non-highlighted limitation above. 19176219 11099631 With reference to claim 2: With reference to claim 1: With reference to claim 3: With reference to claim 1: With reference to claim 4: With reference to claim 1: With reference to claim 5: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 6: With reference to claims 1 and 5: With reference to claim 7: With reference to claims 1 and 6: With reference to claim 8: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 10: With reference to claim 8: With reference to claim 11: With reference to claim 8: With reference to claim 12: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 13: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 14: With reference to claims 8, 11, 12, and 13: With reference to claim 16: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 17: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 18: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 19: With reference to claim 15: With reference to claim 20: With reference to claims 8, 11, 12, and 13: Claims 2-8, 10-14, and 16-20 of this application is being anticipated by claim 1, 5-6, 8, 11-13, and 15 of patent 11099631 with similar variation in the non-highlighted limitation above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 20140028458 relates to a content providing method in an electronic device, the method including: reproducing an image of content; obtaining information regarding a posture of a user based on an image of the user; determining whether the posture of the user is acceptable based on the obtained information regarding the posture of the user; and controlling reproduction of the content according to a result of the determination. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IFEDAYO B ILUYOMADE whose telephone number is (571)270-7118. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 5712707230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IFEDAYO B ILUYOMADE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624 12/12/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596432
Methods Circuits Devices Systems Applications and Functionally Associated Machine Executable Code for Digital Device Display Adjustment
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586513
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12561026
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562095
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554129
EYE IMAGING IN HEAD WORN COMPUTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month