Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/176,779

OPTICAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND RECEIVING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 11, 2025
Priority
May 15, 2024 — JP 2024-079631
Examiner
LIU, LI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1400 granted / 1740 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1740 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/11/2025 and 8/17/2026 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iizuka et al (US 2014/0111298) in view of Noma et al (JP 2024/031615. English Machine Translation provided). 1). With regard to claim 1, Iizuka et al discloses an optical wireless communication system (Figure 1 etc.) comprising: a plurality of light sources (3A – 3D etc.); a receiving device (100) including a camera (30A or 30B etc.); and an information processing device (10 in Figure 3), wherein each light source is configured to transmit an optical wireless communication signal ([0025] etc., “the position indicators 3 each transmit at least unique identification information (light source ID capable of uniquely identifying itself)”), the receiving device is configured to receive the optical wireless communication signal through the camera (Figures 1 and 3, the visible light communication camera 30), the optical wireless communication signal includes position specifying information (“the position indicators 3 each transmit at least unique identification information”, and [0027]-[0028], “The installation position (three-dimensional position) in the world coordinate system (X, Y, Z) of each position indicator 3 is measured at the time of installation. A correspondence relationship between the light source ID and the three-dimensional position of each position indicator 3 is stored in a light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 (shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) in the moving object 100”, and “If the position indicators 3 are capable of transmitting data of a sufficient amount of information, they may transmit data of their positions and heights (three-dimensional positions)”), for specifying a position of a transmission source of the optical wireless communication signal in an absolute coordinate system (“in the world coordinate system (X, Y, Z)”), and the information processing device is configured to: acquire a light source image position (Figure 5, [0059]) indicating a position of each light source (2A (P2, Q1) and 2B (P2, Q2) etc. in in Figure 5) projected on an image plane coordinate system (image plane 70 in Figure 5) of an image plane obtained by the camera, by specifying a signal region (“coordinate positions of the points projected onto an image plane”, [0052]-[0056]) of the optical wireless communication signal on the image plane coordinate system; acquire a light source absolute position indicating a position of each light source in the absolute coordinate system ([0027]-[0028], “A correspondence relationship between the light source ID and the three-dimensional position of each position indicator 3 is stored in a light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 (shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) in the moving object 100”), based on the position specifying information included in the optical wireless communication signal ([0027]-[0028] and [0044], “In the light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21, as to each of the position indicators 3, a light source ID of a position indicator 3 is associated with a three-dimensional position of the position indicator 3 as its installation position. The light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 is used for the positioning using the visible light communication”); and estimate a position (e.g., by the positioning processor 12) and an orientation (e.g., by the positioning processor 12 and the “three-axis attitude angle and likelihood determiner 14” in Figure 3) of the camera in the absolute coordinate system (Figures 3-4, [0056] etc.), using the light source image position and the light source absolute position (Figure 8, steps S6-S8; Figure 9). But, Iizuka et al does not expressly disclose that the camera is an event camera. However, first, Iizuka et al discloses “In FIG. 7, where the integrated value E is greater than a threshold value E0, the likelihood C is 0” and “the measurement by the star tracker may become performable again by a threshold value for the positioning likelihood being set and the moving object 100 being stopped at the timing when the positioning likelihood falls below the threshold value”; that is, Iizuka et al uses a threshold to judge whether an event occurs. Second, an event camera has been widely used in the art to determine whether an event occurs based on the luminance change on the camera sensor or changes in brightness at the pixel level. E.g., Noma et al discloses a system/method to estimate road condition by using an event camera ([0015], “Each event sensor 1A to 1D is an image sensor built into the imaging device (event camera), and outputs event data related to brightness changes in the imaging area of each imaging device”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the event camera of Noma et al for the camera of Iizuka et al according to known methods to yield the predictable result of providing a receiver with very low motion blur, high dynamic range (handle extreme lighting changes), and low latency and bandwidth (only transmit data when motion occurs, reducing data waste and processing loads). 2). With regard to claim 2, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 1 above. But, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al do not expressly disclose wherein the information processing device is configured to specify the signal region on the image plane coordinate system, based on a frequency of event data for each pixel of the image plane obtained by the event camera. However, the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose that an event camera is used to detect the light sources. A fundamental property of an event camera is that a pixel “fires” an event only when the local change in light intensity crosses a specific threshold. And Iizuka et al also discloses “The position indicators 3 control light emission or reflection by color modulation or luminance (intensity) modulation in the range of wavelengths of visible light and transmit information” ([0027] and [0032], claim 9: “the second light sources modulate light and transmit their respective pieces of identification information”); each modulation has its own frequency or data rate; therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to specify the signal region on the image plane coordinate system, based on a frequency of event data for each pixel of the image plane obtained by the event camera so to only pick up needed “event” and eliminate noise. 3). With regard to claim 3, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 1 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses wherein the position specifying information includes the light source absolute position of each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0052]-[0063], also refer to claim 1 rejection above). 4). With regard to claim 4, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 1 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses the optical wireless communication system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device (Iizuka: 21 in Figure 3), wherein the memory device is configured to store at least: identification information for identifying each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]); and the light source absolute position of each light source ([0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]), the position specifying information includes the identification information of each light source ([0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]), and the information processing device is configured to acquire the light source absolute position, corresponding to the identification information included in the position specifying information, from the memory device ([0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132], Figures 3-4 and 8-9). 5). With regard to claim 5, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 1 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses wherein the receiving device is configured to be movable (Iizuka: the moving object 100). 6). With regard to claim 6, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose a receiving device (100 in Figure 1, and Figure 3) comprising: a camera (30A or 30B etc.); and an information processing device (10 in Figure 3) configured to receive an optical wireless communication signal ([0025] etc., “the position indicators 3 each transmit at least unique identification information (light source ID capable of uniquely identifying itself)”) transmitted from each of a plurality of light sources (3A – 3D etc.) through the camera (Figures 1-4 etc.), wherein the optical wireless communication signal includes position specifying information (“the position indicators 3 each transmit at least unique identification information”, and [0027]-[0028], “The installation position (three-dimensional position) in the world coordinate system (X, Y, Z) of each position indicator 3 is measured at the time of installation. A correspondence relationship between the light source ID and the three-dimensional position of each position indicator 3 is stored in a light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 (shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) in the moving object 100”, and “If the position indicators 3 are capable of transmitting data of a sufficient amount of information, they may transmit data of their positions and heights (three-dimensional positions)”), for specifying a position of a transmission source of the optical wireless communication signal in an absolute coordinate system (“in the world coordinate system (X, Y, Z)”), and the information processing device is configured to: acquire a light source image position (Figure 5, [0059]) indicating a position of each light source (2A (P2, Q1) and 2B (P2, Q2) etc. in Figure 5) projected on an image plane coordinate system (image plane 70 in Figure 5), by specifying a signal region (“coordinate positions of the points projected onto an image plane”, [0052]-[0056]) of the optical wireless communication signal on the image plane coordinate system of an image plane obtained by the camera (Figure 5); acquire a light source absolute position indicating a position of each light source in the absolute coordinate system ([0027]-[0028], “A correspondence relationship between the light source ID and the three-dimensional position of each position indicator 3 is stored in a light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 (shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) in the moving object 100”), based on the position specifying information included in the optical wireless communication signal ([0027]-[0028] and [0044], “In the light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21, as to each of the position indicators 3, a light source ID of a position indicator 3 is associated with a three-dimensional position of the position indicator 3 as its installation position. The light source ID to three-dimensional position table 21 is used for the positioning using the visible light communication”); and estimate a position (e.g., by the positioning processor 12) and an orientation (e.g., by the positioning processor 12 and the “three-axis attitude angle and likelihood determiner 14” in Figure 3) of the camera in the absolute coordinate system (Figures 3-4, [0056] etc.), using the light source image position and the light source absolute position (Figure 8, steps S6-S8; Figure 9). But, Iizuka et al does not expressly disclose that the camera is an event camera. However, first, Iizuka et al discloses “In FIG. 7, where the integrated value E is greater than a threshold value E0, the likelihood C is 0” and “the measurement by the star tracker may become performable again by a threshold value for the positioning likelihood being set and the moving object 100 being stopped at the timing when the positioning likelihood falls below the threshold value”; that is, Iizuka et al uses a threshold to judge whether an event occurs. Second, an event camera has been widely used in the art to determine whether an event occurs based on the luminance change on the camera sensor or changes in brightness at the pixel level. E.g., Noma et al discloses a system/method to estimate road condition by using an event camera ([0015], “Each event sensor 1A to 1D is an image sensor built into the imaging device (event camera), and outputs event data related to brightness changes in the imaging area of each imaging device”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the event camera of Noma et al for the camera of Iizuka et al according to known methods to yield the predictable result of providing a receiver with very low motion blur, high dynamic range (handle extreme lighting changes), and low latency and bandwidth (only transmit data when motion occurs, reducing data waste and processing loads) 7). With regard to claim 7, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 6 above. But, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al do not expressly disclose wherein the information processing device is configured to specify the signal region on the image plane coordinate system, based on a frequency of event data for each pixel of the image plane obtained by the event camera. However, the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose that an event camera is used to detect the light sources. A fundamental property of an event camera is that a pixel “fires” an event only when the local change in light intensity crosses a specific threshold. And Iizuka et al also discloses “The position indicators 3 control light emission or reflection by color modulation or luminance (intensity) modulation in the range of wavelengths of visible light and transmit information” ([0027] and [0032], claim 9: “the second light sources modulate light and transmit their respective pieces of identification information”); each modulation has its own frequency or data rate; therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to specify the signal region on the image plane coordinate system, based on a frequency of event data for each pixel of the image plane obtained by the event camera so to only pick up needed “event” and eliminate noise. 8). With regard to claim 8, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 6 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses wherein the position specifying information includes the light source absolute position of each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0052]-[0063], also refer to claim 1 rejection above). 9). With regard to claim 9, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 6 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses the receiving device according to claim 6, further comprising a memory device (Iizuka: 21 in Figure 3), wherein the memory device is configured to store at least: identification information for identifying each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]); and the light source absolute position of each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]), the position specifying information includes the identification information of each light source (Iizuka: [0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132]), and the information processing device is configured to acquire the light source absolute position, corresponding to the identification information included in the position specifying information, from the memory device ([0027], [0043]-[0044], [0129] and [0132], Figures 3-4 and 8-9). 10). With regard to claim 10, Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al disclose all of the subject matter as applied to claim 6 above. And the combination of Iizuka et al and Iizuka et al further discloses he receiving device according to claim 6, configured to be movable (Iizuka: the moving object 100). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20150372753 A1 US 20160047890 A1 US 20240243809 A1 US 20220092815 A1 US 20200245424 A1 US 10378897 B2 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LI LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-1084. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am - 8 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Vanderpuye can be reached at (571)272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LI LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2634 September 19, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744594
NETWORK CONTROLLER, ESTIMATION METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732339
CLOCK FREQUENCY DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732298
OPTICAL NETWORK UNIT TESTING IN A MULTI-WAVELENGTH PASSIVE OPTICAL NETWORK SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732279
OPTICAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726271
OPTICAL SPACE COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE, OPTICAL SPACE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND OPTICAL SPACE COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month