Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/177,048

POWERTRAIN SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 11, 2025
Examiner
FLUHART, STACEY A
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Yantai Jereh Petroleum Equipment & Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
681 granted / 824 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “power conversion mechanism” in claim 1. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. The power conversion mechanism is disclosed as including a first clutch that engages and disengages the speed reduction mechanism; or a first clutch and a first brake with the disclosed functions. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the speed reduction mechanism is configured to drive a first load to move” and “a first power disconnection state in which the first load is disconnected from the speed reduction mechanism.” If the first load is the torque output from the speed reduction mechanism, which is the interpretation of the speed reduction mechanism that drives the first load, the how does the clutch cause the output from the speed reduction mechanism to not be output from the speed reduction mechanism? In other words, the manner in which this is recited makes it unclear to which force or movement the first load refers. In addition, the specification does not include a reference number for this load and therefore it is unclear to which element this is intended to refer. Claim 2 recites “wherein the power conversion mechanism comprises: a first clutch configured to be disengaged from or engaged with the speed reduction mechanism.” There are multiple embodiments some which only include one clutch and some which include more than one clutch. It is unclear if the clutch that is disengaged refers to the one half of the clutch which becomes disengaged from the speed reduction mechanism in all embodiments or if this is intended to mean the entirety of the clutch is disengaged, as in the embodiments with more than one clutch. That is, there is no more than one meaning of clutch that is consistent with the specification but it is not clear which meaning was intended by this term and the different meanings change the embodiment to which the claim is directed as well as the scope of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ozawa (US 5,890,468). Claim 1 Ozawa discloses a powertrain system, comprising (see FIG. 19): an engine (1); a speed reduction mechanism (6, 7 and/or 11-14), wherein the engine (1) is drivingly connected to at least a portion of the speed reduction mechanism (6 or 13), and the speed reduction mechanism is configured to drive a first load to move (171); and a power conversion mechanism (170 or combination of 170 and 172), arranged between the speed reduction mechanism (6, 7 and/or 11-14) and the first load (171), wherein the power conversion mechanism (170 or combination of 170 and 172) is configured to operate in one of: a first power connection state (when 170 is engaged) in which the first load is connected to the speed reduction mechanism; or a first power disconnection state (when 170 is disengaged) in which the first load is disconnected from the speed reduction mechanism. Claim 2 Ozawa discloses wherein the power conversion mechanism (170 or combination of 170 and 172) comprises: a first clutch (170 or portion 170 of the combination of 170 and 172) configured to be disengaged from or engaged with the speed reduction mechanism. Claim 3 Ozawa discloses wherein the power conversion mechanism (combination of 170 and 172) comprises: a first clutch (170 or portion 170 of the combination of 170 and 172); and a first brake (172), wherein: when the first clutch (170) is disengaged from the speed reduction mechanism, the first brake (172) is configured to brake a power output section (14) of the power conversion mechanism or a power input section (175) of the first load; or when the first clutch (170) is engaged with the speed reduction mechanism, the first brake (172) releases the braking on the power output section of the power conversion mechanism or the power input section of the first load (see e.g., states B-1 and C-1 modes). Claim 17 Ozawa discloses wherein the engine comprises a reciprocal engine (internal combustion engine is a reciprocal engine). Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kozarekar et al. (US 8,894,526; hereinafter “Kozarekar”). Claim 1 Kozarekar discloses a powertrain system, comprising (see only figure): an engine (18 or 34); a speed reduction mechanism (24), wherein the engine (18 or 34) is drivingly connected to at least a portion of the speed reduction mechanism (each of 18 and 34 are respectively connected to elements 70 and 36 of the planetary gearset), and the speed reduction mechanism (24) is configured to drive a first load (48) to move; and a power conversion mechanism (82 or the combination of 82 and 84), arranged between the speed reduction mechanism (24) and the first load (48), wherein the power conversion mechanism (82 or the combination of 82 and 84) is configured to operate in one of: a first power connection state (when 82 is engaged) in which the first load is connected to the speed reduction mechanism; or a first power disconnection state (when 82 is disengaged) in which the first load is disconnected from the speed reduction mechanism. Claim 2 Kozarekar discloses wherein the power conversion mechanism (82 or the combination of 82 and 84) comprises: a first clutch (82) configured to be disengaged from or engaged with the speed reduction mechanism. Claim 3 Kozarekar discloses wherein the power conversion mechanism comprises: a first clutch (82); and a first brake (84), wherein: [when the first clutch (82) is disengaged from the speed reduction mechanism, the first brake (84) is configured to brake a power output section (64) of the power conversion mechanism or a power input section (56 or 50) of the first load (48); or when the first clutch (82) is engaged with the speed reduction mechanism (24), the first brake (84) releases the braking on the power output section (64) of the power conversion mechanism or the power input section (56 or 50) of the first load (48). Claim 4 Kozarekar discloses wherein the speed reduction mechanism (24) comprises: a first speed reduction structure (38, 72, 64, 70); and a second load (34), wherein: the engine (18) is drivingly connected to the first speed reduction structure; the first speed reduction structure has a first power output end (64) and a second power output end (38); the first power output end (64) is drivingly connected to the first load (48); the second power output end (38) is drivingly connected to the second load (34); and the first speed reduction structure (38, 72, 64, 70) is selectively and drivingly connected to the first load (48) and/or the second load (34). Claim 5 Kozarekar discloses wherein the second load (34) comprises an electric generator or an electromotor (see only figure 34 is a motor generator). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-16 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. With reference to claim 6, the prior art does not disclose or render obvious a powertrain system comprising the combination of the speed reduction mechanism with two outputs, the clutch that achieves the two states recited in claim 1, two loads each respectively connected to one of the two outputs, and “a speed governing mechanism comprising a second speed reduction structure and a speed governing motor, wherein: the second speed reduction structure has a first power input end and a second power input end; the first power input end is selectively connected to or disconnected from the first power output end; a power output section of the second speed reduction structure is drivingly connected to the first load; the second power input end is selectively connected to or disconnected from a power output section of the speed governing motor; and the second load is configured to be selectively connected to the speed governing motor to supply power to the speed governing motor.” Governors are typically performed by control of drive sources or control of clutches. There are governors that include planetary gearsets however the combination of the governor having the planetary gearset with two inputs and a distinct gear reducer with two outputs and the two loads and multiple interconnections as recited is not an obvious combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20070151258 discloses an engine (engine 100 which powers motor 142), speed reduction mechanism (213) drives a load (140), a power conversion mechanism (clutch 214), which can be in a connection state or disconnection state. US 10,495,003 discloses a motor (110) that includes a speed reduction mechanism (152), a power conversion mechanism (124) to a load (130). US 3,951,008 discloses a drive source (3) connected to a speed reduction mechanism, followed by a power conversion mechanism (JC) to connect or disconnect from a load (GT) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STACEY A FLUHART whose telephone number is (571)270-1851. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-7PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at 571-270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STACEY A FLUHART/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 31, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590612
MULTI-PISTON DISENGAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A BRAKE DEVICE OF A VEHICLE, BRAKE DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE HAVING A MULTI-PISTON DISENGAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND TRANSMISSION ARRANGEMENT FOR A VEHICLE HAVING THE BRAKE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577989
CLUTCH CONTROL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577990
ELECTROMAGNETICALLY SHIFTABLE POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT CLUTCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558956
VEHICLE DIFFERENTIAL DISCONNECT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560219
DRIVE UNIT AND TRANSMISSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month