Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/178,372

Selecting Garbage Collection Processes

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 14, 2025
Priority
Feb 22, 2024 — continuation of 12/306,750
Examiner
BIRKHIMER, CHRISTOPHER D
Art Unit
2138
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
ORACLE INTERNATIONAL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 509 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
540
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The current Office Action is in response to the papers submitted 04/14/2025. Claims 1 - 20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: Claims 1 – 18 discloses computer-readable media in line 1 of each claim. There is no mention of any computer-readable media in the specification. The specification does disclose a storage media but fails to disclose computer-readable media from the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 - 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 – 18 recite “computer-readable media” in line 1 of each claim. There is no previous mention of a computer-readable media in the specification. The specification discloses a storage media but not a computer-readable media as recited in the claims. It is unclear if the storage media from the specification is meant to be the claimed computer-readable media or if the computer-readable media is some other media separate from the storage media. This makes the scope of what the computer-readable media is indefinite since it is not disclosed in the specification. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 - 18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 19 - 20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art teaches the use of threads in garbage collection and sharing objects in computer memory. However, the prior art fails to teach individually or in combination the limitations of… (Claim 19) “…detecting termination of the thread; subsequent to detecting termination of the thread: determining that the thread did not encounter any shared objects, in the first private memory region, accessible by one or more additional threads; based on determining that the thread did not encounter any shared objects, in the first private memory region, accessible by one or more additional threads: executing a sweeping thread-local garbage collection process comprising reclaiming the first private memory region…” The claim requires detecting that a thread has terminated or finished processing. After the detecting of the thread termination the system determines that the thread did no encounter any shared objects. This is not to be construed as saying the system determines whether the thread encountered a shared object. The claimed system always determines the thread did not encounter any shared objects. There is no determining if a shared object was encountered, the system always determines the thread did not encounter a shared object. Based on the determination, which is always performed and is always determined as not accessing a shared object, a sweeping thread-local garbage collection process is performed. The prior teaches using threads in garbage collection but fails to teach always determining a thread never accesses a shared object and then performing garbage collection based on the determination. Claim 20 is a system claim corresponding to claim 19 with similar language and is thus allowable for similar reasons as claim 19. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER D BIRKHIMER whose telephone number is (571)270-1178. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 Hoteling. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tim Vo can be reached at 571-272-3642. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Christopher D Birkhimer/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2138
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706151
STORAGE DEVICE FOR DETERMINING MEMORY CELL TYPE AFTER DATA INPUT DURING PROGRAM OPERATION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699533
CACHING FOR MULTIPLE-LEVEL MEMORY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693803
MEMORY DEVICE, OPERATING METHOD OF MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12675221
MEMORY SYSTEMS AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOF, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664104
METHOD FOR SHARING A STORAGE DEVICE AMONG MULTIPLE PROCESSORS AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+6.9%)
3y 1m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month