Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/180,471

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SECURELY STORING AND PROVIDING INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 16, 2025
Examiner
QAYYUM, ZESHAN
Art Unit
3697
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fingon LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5y 1m
To Grant
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allow Rate
172 granted / 429 resolved
-11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
459
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 429 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Status of Claims Claims 1-18 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15-18 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dewan (US 20140157410) in view of Johnson (US 20120163589). With respect to claims 1 and 10 Dewan discloses: receiving, by the secure zone, information pertaining to code that is executable on one or more secure processors within the secure zone via the interface (See paragraph 0027-0028 and Fig 3); determining, by the secure zone, whether requirements are fulfilled for the code (See paragraph 0028 i.e. identifies it as protected content); if the requirements are fulfilled, loading, by the secure zone, the code into the one or more instruction memories located within the secure zone (See paragraph 0028 and Fig 3); causing, by the secure zone, the secure processor to execute the code that has been loaded into the one or more instruction memories located within the secure zone (See paragraph 0028 and Fig 3). Dewan further discloses: cleans the hardware state (see paragraph 0029) Dewan does not explicitly disclose: clearing and/or pre-filling, by the secure zone, the one or more data memories located within the secure zone. Johnson discloses: clearing and/or pre-filling, by the secure zone, the one or more data memories located within the secure zone (See paragraph 0055). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art at the time invention was filed to modify the Dewan reference with Johnson reference in order to provide extra data security. With respect to claims 2 and 11 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the secure zone further includes one or more cryptographic engines configured to implement one or more cryptographic algorithms (See paragraph 0014). With respect to claims 3 and 12 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Johnson further discloses: wherein the secure zone is further configured to control one or more indicators that are used to indicate security modes of the electronic device (See paragraph 0079). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art at the time invention was filed to modify the Dewan reference with Johnson reference in order to provide extra data security. With respect to claims 4 and 13 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the secure zone is further configured to control one or more peripherals within the electronic device (See paragraph 0040 and 0044-0045). With respect to claims 6 and 15 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the supervisor is configured to control access to components of the secure zone (See paragraph 0028-0030) Additionally, Johnson (paragraph 0086). With respect to claims 7 and 16 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the supervisor is configured to enforce operational rules of the secure zone so as to provide security assurances to a user (See paragraph 0028-0030). With respect to claims 8 and 17 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the non-secure zone comprises an operating system and one or more applications (See paragraph 0019 and 0031). With respect to claims 9 and 18 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan further discloses: wherein the non-secure zone is configured to provide one or more of messages, codes or tasks to the secure zone (See paragraph 0027). Claims 5 and 14 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dewan (US 20140157410) in view of Johnson (US 20120163589) and in further view of Bates (US 6634020). With respect to claims 5 and 16 Dewan in view of Johnson discloses all the limitations as describe above. Dewan in view of Johnson does not explicitly disclose: provide visual feedback to a user regarding an origin of the loaded code. Bates discloses: provide visual feedback to a user regarding an origin of the loaded code (See column 4 lines 43-49 and claim 31). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art at the time invention was filed to modify the combination of Dewan and Johnson references with Bates reference in order to facilitate debugging of computer program (Bates column 3 lines 7-11). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZESHAN QAYYUM whose telephone number is (571)270-3323. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00AM-6:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John W Hayes can be reached at (571) 272-6708. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZESHAN QAYYUM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3697
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602184
Systems and Methods for Source Chain Management with Identity-Based Tokens and Enhanced Security
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12561672
COMPUTING SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING AUTOMATED TRANSACTION EXECUTION BASED ON MESSAGING TRIGGERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555108
ANALYTICS RULES ENGINE FOR CREDIT TRANSACTION STACKING IDENTIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12548023
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR BLOCKING MULTI-RAIL CONTACTLESS FRAUD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542939
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS CORRESPONDING TO RECORDINGS OF LIVE EVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+26.3%)
5y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 429 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month