Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/180,597

VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 16, 2025
Priority
Jan 25, 2018 — RE 10-2018-0009660 +6 more
Examiner
HABIB, IRFAN
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
661 granted / 751 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
76.0%
+36.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 751 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION 1. This office action is in response to U.S. Patent Application No.: 19/180,597 filed on 4/16/2025 with effective filing date 1/25/2018. Claims 1-4 are pending. Double Patenting 2. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 3. Claims 1-4 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,395,643, claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 11,863,760 and claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No. 11,417,91. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Current Application US 12,395,643 1. A video signal decoding method comprising: generating, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determining at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determining a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index, the parameter set includes at least one of a first parameter for a reference sample on a left side of the current block and a second parameter for a reference sample on an upper side of the current block; generating a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restoring the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes. 1. A video signal decoding method comprising: generating, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determining at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determining a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index; generating a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restoring the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes, wherein a location of the at least one reference sample is determined by using a prediction angle corresponding to the intra prediction mode for the current block. 2. A video signal decoding device comprising a processor, wherein the processor is configured to: generate, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determine at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determine a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index, the parameter set includes at least one of a first parameter for a reference sample on a left side of the current block and a second parameter for a reference sample on an upper side of the current block; generate a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restore the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes. 2. A video signal decoding device comprising a processor, wherein the processor is configured to: generate, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determine at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determine a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index; generate a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restore the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes, wherein a location of the at least one reference sample is determined by using a prediction angle corresponding to the intra prediction mode for the current block. 3. A video signal encoding apparatus comprising a processor, wherein the processor is configured to: generate, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determine at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determine a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index, the parameter set includes at least one of a first parameter for a reference sample on a left side of the current block and a second parameter for a reference sample on an upper side of the current block; generate a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restore the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes. 3. A video signal encoding apparatus comprising a processor, wherein the processor is configured to: generate, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determine at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determine a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index; generate a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restore the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes, wherein a location of the at least one reference sample is determined by using a prediction angle corresponding to the intra prediction mode for the current block 4. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a bitstream, the bitstream being decoded by a decoding method, wherein the decoding method comprises: generating, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determining at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determining a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index, the parameter set includes at least one of a first parameter for a reference sample on a left side of the current block and a second parameter for a reference sample on an upper side of the current block; generating a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restoring the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes. 4. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a bitstream, the bitstream being decoded by a decoding method, wherein the decoding method comprises: generating, based on an intra prediction mode for a current block, a first prediction sample of a current sample included in the current block, wherein the intra prediction mode for the current block is indicated by an intra prediction mode index among a plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in a specific index set; determining at least one reference sample corresponding to the current sample among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode for the current block; determining a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index; generating a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restoring the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, and wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes, wherein a location of the at least one reference sample is determined by using a prediction angle corresponding to the intra prediction mode for the current block. Allowable Subject Matter After analyzing the current application examiner concluded that the novelty of the current application involves the method involves generating a first predicted sample of a current sample included in a current block based on an intra prediction mode of a current block, where the intra prediction mode of the current block includes intra prediction mode index. A reference sample (AA) corresponding to the current sample is determined among reference samples of the current block based on the intra prediction mode of the current block. Reference value corresponding to the current sample is obtained based on unfiltered sample value of the reference sample. A current sample is restored based on a residual signal of the current sample and a predicted sample, where parameter sets corresponding to specific index set are different from each other according to shape of the current block. The prior art of record in particular, Heo et al. US 2020/0396483 A1 in view of Seregin et al. US 2017/0272759 A1 and Jang et al. US 2019/0174128 A1 does not disclose, with respect to claim 1, determining a parameter set based on at least one of a width of the current block, a height of the current block, whether the intra prediction mode index is smaller than a first index, and whether the intra prediction mode index is greater than a second index, the parameter set includes at least one of a first parameter for a reference sample on a left side of the current block and a second parameter for a reference sample on an upper side of the current block; generating a second prediction sample by linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample based on the determined parameter set, wherein the determined parameter set is used for determining a weight which is used for linearly combining the first prediction sample and the at least one reference sample; and restoring the current sample based on a residual sample of the current sample and the second prediction sample, wherein any one of the plurality of intra prediction mode indexes included in the specific index set indicates any one of a plurality of angular modes as claimed. Rather, Heo et al. discloses the method involves acquiring specific value for showing similarity between reference samples for performing intra-prediction of a current block. Intra prediction mode of the current block is determined based on specific threshold value and the obtained value. The current block is restored based on the determined intra prediction mode. A candidate mode list is produced based on the intra prediction mode of a neighbor block of the current block without obtaining flag information for indicating whether the intra-prediction mode of the current block is induced from the neighbor block of the current block. Index information is obtained from bit-stream when the specific for showing the similarity is less than the specific threshold value. Candidate mode is determined based on the index information for indicating the candidate mode list and the intra-prediction mode of the current block. Similarly, Seregin et al. discloses the method involves receiving (240) a block of video data encoded using a prediction mode. The one or more parameters are determined (242) for the prediction mode based on one or more of the width or the height of the block of video data. The block of video data using the PDPC mode and the determined PDPC parameters is decoded (244). The wireless communication device is a mobile station and the block of video data is received by the receiver and modulated according to a cellular communication standard. Moreover Jang et al. discloses the method involves determining a current block a square-off block. A reference sample utilized in prediction of the current block is configured (S502) based on breadth and height information of the current block. An intra prediction mode of the current block is drawn. A prediction sample of the current block is produced based on the intra prediction mode of the current block by using the reference sample. A sub block is coincided with a transformation unit in which a residual signal of the current block is transformed. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IRFAN HABIB whose telephone number is (571)270-7325. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th 9AM-7PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at 5712722988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Irfan Habib/ Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707074
Local Illumination Compensation for Inter Prediction
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707043
LOCAL BLUR AND ILLUMINATION COMPENSATION
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701216
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701217
VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695896
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CODING VIDEO DATA
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 1m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 751 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month