Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/181,838

MOTOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN APPLIANCE SUCH AS A VACUUM CLEANER AND A VACUUM CLEANER HAVING SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Examiner
BERTHEAUD, PETER JOHN
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Omachron Intellectual Property INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
805 granted / 1035 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1053
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Claim 15 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/19/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Randall 3,950,686. Randall discloses, regarding claim 1, a motor 10 comprising: a stator comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced stator poles 41-44 and a plurality of stator coils (see coils wrapped around poles 41-44 in Figs. 1-2), the plurality of stator coils comprising a plurality of stator pole coils (again, see coils wrapped around poles 41-44 in Figs. 1-2) corresponding to the plurality of stator poles 41-44; a first rotor (comprising elements 20, 25, 60, 15’, and 41’-43’) comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced first rotor poles (see poles on either end of 25 in Fig. 2) and a plurality of first rotor coils (see coils wrapped around rotor poles 41’ and 43’ in Figs. 1), the plurality of first rotor coils comprising a plurality of first rotor pole coils (again, see coils wrapped around poles 41’ and 43’ in Fig. 1) corresponding to the plurality of first rotor poles (substantially broad – the poles of 25 correspond to the poles 41’ and 43’ as they rotate as one in a fixed orientation), wherein the plurality of first rotor poles (of 25) are positioned in a facing arrangement with the plurality of stator poles 41-44 (see Figs. 1-2); and at least one controller (see circuit in Figs. 3-4), the at least one controller operable to independently control activation of the stator poles 41-44 and the first rotor poles (of 25) to thereby induce rotation of the motor 10, wherein the at least one controller is operable to control the provision of a rotor control signal to the first rotor, wherein the rotor control signal is defined to control the activation of the first rotor poles (see col. 2, lines 18-25); Re claim 2, wherein the at least one controller is operable to independently control a stator switching frequency of the stator poles 41-44 (substantially broad – this is clearly the case, see col. 2, lines 18-25); Re claim 4, wherein one of the stator switching frequency of the stator poles 41-44 and the first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles (of 25) is a fixed frequency (this is clearly the case). Claims 1-5, 7, and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Faxon 3,478,237. Faxon discloses, regarding claim 1, a motor M comprising: a stator 10 comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced stator poles 36 and a plurality of stator coils 40, the plurality of stator coils comprising a plurality of stator pole coils 40 corresponding to the plurality of stator poles 36; a first rotor 20 comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced first rotor poles 50 and a plurality of first rotor coils 54, the plurality of first rotor coils comprising a plurality of first rotor pole coils 54 corresponding to the plurality of first rotor poles 50, wherein the plurality of first rotor poles 50 are positioned in a facing arrangement with the plurality of stator poles 36 (see Figs. 1-2); and at least one controller C, the at least one controller C operable to independently control activation of the stator poles 36 and the first rotor poles 50 to thereby induce rotation of the motor M, wherein the at least one controller C is operable to control the provision of a rotor control signal to the first rotor 20, wherein the rotor control signal is defined to control the activation of the first rotor poles 36 (see col. 2, lines 45-52); Re claim 2, wherein the at least one controller C is operable to independently control at least one of a stator switching frequency of the stator poles 36 and a first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles 50 (substantially broad – see individual wiring 26 and 30, as well as brushes 62, and switching elements 46 and 48); Re claim 3, wherein the at least one controller C is operable to independently control the stator switching frequency of the stator poles 36 and the first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles 50 (substantially broad – see individual wiring 26 and 30, as well as brushes 62, and switching elements 46 and 48); Re claim 4, wherein one of the stator switching frequency of the stator poles 36 and the first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles 50 is a fixed frequency (this is clearly the case based on the disclosed operation in col. 3, line 56 to col. 4, line 3); Re claim 5, wherein the at least one controller C is operable to independently control at least one of a stator pole active number of stator poles 36 or a first rotor pole active number of first rotor poles 50 (substantially broad, the stator poles and rotor poles can be activated individually, see 26 and 30, so that is “at least one” of both types of poles); Re claim 7, wherein the first rotor 20 receives first rotor power to activate the first rotor poles 50 from the stator via brushes 62; Re claim 11, wherein the first rotor 20 is coupled to an external power source B and the stator 10 is separately coupled to the external power source B, and the first rotor 20 receives first rotor power to activate the first rotor poles 50 from the external power source B; Re claim 12, wherein the at least one controller C includes a rotor controller 46/48 positioned onboard the first rotor 20, wherein the rotor controller 46/48 is operable to define a first rotor pole switch signal to control the activation of the first rotor poles 50; Re claim 13, wherein the first rotor 20 is operable to receive a first rotor pole switch signal (via 46/48) to control the activation of the first rotor poles 50; Re claim 14, wherein the first rotor 20 comprises a passive switching circuit operable to adjust a frequency of activation of the first rotor poles 50 in response to receiving the first rotor pole switch signal (see col. 3, lines 3-15). Claims 1-3 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Satake 5,285,124. Satake discloses, regarding claim 1, a motor 20/30 comprising: a stator 20 comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced stator poles (see col. 5, lines 16-18) and a plurality of stator coils 21, 22, the plurality of stator coils comprising a plurality of stator pole coils (each of the 4 poles of stator 20 has a coil of winding 21 or 22) corresponding to the plurality of stator poles (again, see col. 5, lines 16-18); a first rotor 30 comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced first rotor poles (see the 4 poles of rotor cores 31 and 32 in Figs. 1 and 3) and a plurality of first rotor coils 33, 34, the plurality of first rotor coils 33, 34 comprising a plurality of first rotor pole coils corresponding to the plurality of first rotor poles (see how the coils of 33 and 34 are wrapped around the poles of the rotor in Fig. 3), wherein the plurality of first rotor poles are positioned in a facing arrangement with the plurality of stator poles (this is clearly the case Figs. 1 and 3); and at least one controller 25, the at least one controller 25 operable to independently control activation of the stator poles and the first rotor poles to thereby induce rotation of the motor 20/30, wherein the at least one controller 25 is operable to control the provision of a rotor control signal to the first rotor 30, wherein the rotor control signal is defined to control the activation of the first rotor poles (see col. 6, lines 12-35); Re claim 2, wherein the at least one controller 25 is operable to independently control at least one of a stator switching frequency of the stator poles and a first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles (substantially broad – see col. 6, line 12-35 as well as col. 6, line 45 to col. 7, line 10); Re claim 3, wherein the at least one controller 25 is operable to independently control the stator switching frequency of the stator poles and the first rotor switching frequency of the first rotor poles (substantially broad – see col. 6, line 12-35 as well as col. 6, line 45 to col. 7, line 10); Re claim 6, wherein the first rotor 30 receives first rotor power to activate the first rotor poles from the stator 20 via an electromagnetic coupling between the stator 20 and the first rotor 30 (this is clearly the case in this brushless motor assembly – see col. 6, lines 12-35). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16-20 are allowed. It is noted by the examiner, and stated here for the record of prosecution, that the aspect of the instant invention determined to be novel and patentably distinct from the prior art is the movable second stator being drivingly connected to the first rotor, the second stator comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced second stator coils, the plurality of second stator coils defining a plurality of second stator poles, wherein rotation of the second stator is driven by rotation of the first rotor, a second rotor comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced second rotor coils, the plurality of second rotor coils defining a plurality of second rotor poles, and wherein the plurality of second rotor poles are positioned in a facing arrangement with the plurality of second stator poles. These limitations, in combination with the first stator comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced first stator coils, the plurality of first stator coils defining a plurality of first stator poles, wherein the first stator is fixed, a first rotor comprising a plurality of circumferentially spaced first rotor coils, the plurality of first rotor coils defining a plurality of first rotor poles, and wherein the plurality of first rotor poles are positioned in a facing arrangement with the plurality of first stator poles, make the claim read over the prior art. The sum of these limitations is not disclosed by the prior art and it would not be obvious to combine references in an effort to meet all of the claimed elements. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Peter J Bertheaud whose telephone number is (571)272-3476. The examiner can normally be reached 9am - 5pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devon Kramer can be reached at 5712727118. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PJB /PETER J BERTHEAUD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601340
A Diaphragm Pump
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601346
FLUID END OF RECIPROCATING PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597620
FUEL CELL SYSTEM HAVING AN AIR COMPRESSOR AND A DRIVING CONTROL METHOD FOR A MOTOR OF THE AIR COMPRESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592354
MODULAR GETTERS AND GETTERS WITH DIFFERENT MATERIALS IN VACUUM ENCLOSURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584484
ELECTRIC LIQUID PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month