Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/182,407

Object with Heat Pressed Graphic

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Priority
Apr 24, 2024 — TW 113115340
Examiner
RUMMEL, IAN A
Art Unit
1785
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Chance Line Industrial Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
324 granted / 577 resolved
-8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
601
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.0%
+53.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takei et al., US 2019/0001634 A1, in view of Caspari, US 5393590. Regarding claim 1, Takei teaches a hot-melt adhesive film (10 of Fig. 1) that comprises a hot melt glue layer ([0008]) for adhering a metal foil ([0049], corresponding to the claimed “transfer material”) to an object. The teachings of Takei differ from the present invention in that Takei does not teach that the adhesive layer and transfer material form a graphic on the object. Caspari, however, teaches that it is known in the art to apply such adhesive layers and transfer materials via imagewise heating to selectively transfer a pattern of adhesive and transfer material to a substrate in order to provide alphanumeric or decorative patterns (col. 1 ln. 22-48). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply the adhesive film and transfer material of Takei in an imagewise manner that produced a pattern on the substrate object, as taught by Caspari, because doing so would allow one to produce alphanumeric or decorative patterns, and because Caspari explicitly teaches such graphic pattern formation via imagewise adhesion to be known in the art. Regarding claims 2, 3, and 6, Takei teaches that the adhesive film may comprise an upper and lower adhesive layer made from different materials (Abstract, [0050], [0087], [0127]). Regarding claim 4, Takei teaches an intermediate layer (12 or Fig. 1, corresponding to the claimed “isolation layer”) positioned between the first and second adhesive layers ([0022]). Regarding claim 5, Takei teaches that the intermediate layer may be methylpentene polymer, which has a melting point above 200 ⁰C, while the first and second adhesive layers may have melting points in the range of 100 – 180 ⁰C and 80 -120 ⁰C ([0064], [0080]). Regarding claims 7 and 8, Takei teaches that the transfer material may be a metal foil ([0049]). Regarding claim 9, Takei teaches that the hot melt adhesive material may be a polyolefin (Abstract, [0007]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ian A Rummel whose telephone number is (571)270-5692. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternating Fridays, 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at (571) 272-1291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IAN A RUMMEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636868
SUPPORT FILM AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
1y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629929
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LAMINATED CORE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12608048
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606717
AZO PIGMENT, INK, PAINT, COLORANT FOR PLASTICS, COLORED MOLDED ARTICLE, COLORANT FOR STATIONERY AND WRITING MATERIALS, PRINTING AGENT, TONER, DISPERSION AND RESIST FOR COLOR FILTERS, AND COSMETIC MATERIAL
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12609223
BONDED MAGNET AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 4m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month