Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 19/182,669

SELFIE SETUP AND STOCK VIDEOS CREATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 18, 2025
Priority
Mar 31, 2020 — continuation of 11/477,366 +1 more
Examiner
BHUIYAN, FAYEZ A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Snap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
473 granted / 563 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
575
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Application No. 19/182669, Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of application no. US12294780 B2 (17/886553). Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because all the limitation of Claims 1-20 of 19/182669 application is anticipated by the claims 1-20 of application no. US12294780 B2 (17/886553). Claims 1-20 of 19/182669 are therefore not patentably distinct from the patented applications US12294780 B2 (17/886553), and unpatentable for obvious-type double patenting. Instant Application No.19/182669 Patent NO. US12294780 B2 (17/886553) 1. A method comprising: displaying, by a computing device, a plurality of videos to a user, at least one video of the plurality of videos being generated based on a source video featuring a subject facing a recording device, the subject being associated with a marker indicating a location for insertion of a user- specific content; providing, by the computing device, a user interface configured to enable selection of a video from the plurality of videos; and upon determining that the user has selected the video, generating, by the computing device, a personalized video by combining the selected video with the user-specific content. 1. A method comprising: displaying, by a computing device, a plurality of stock videos to a user, a video of the plurality of stock videos being generated based on a live video featuring an actor wearing a mask and facing a video camera, the mask being a marker for insertion of a self-image of the user; providing, by the computing device, an interface for selecting a stock video from the plurality of stock videos; and upon determining that the user has selected the stock video, forming, by the computing device, a personalized video using the selected stock video and the self-image of the user. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating the personalized video includes: modifying the user-specific content to obtain a modified user-specific content, the modified user-specific content being adjusted to adopt parameters associated with the selected video; and inserting the modified user-specific content into the selected video at the location. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the forming the personalized video includes: modifying the self-image to generate a modified self-image, the modified self-image being adjusted to adopt a facial expression corresponding to facial landmark parameters; and inserting the modified self-image into the stock video at location parameters corresponding to a position of the marker in the stock video. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the parameters are stored in metadata of the selected video. 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the facial landmark parameters are stored in metadata of the stock video. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the parameters include information concerning a facial expression. 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising, prior to the inserting the modified self-image into the stock video, obtaining, by the computing device, the location parameters from metadata of the stock video. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the user-specific content includes a self-image of the user. 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising, prior to the inserting the modified self-image into the stock video, determining, by the computing device, the location parameters based on an image of a frame of the stock vide 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the marker includes a mask attached to the subject. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the forming the personalized video includes: modifying the self-image to generate a modified self-image, the modified self-image being adjusted to adopt a facial expression corresponding to facial landmark parameters; and inserting the modified self-image into the stock video at location parameters corresponding to a position of the marker in the stock video. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the generating the personalized video, providing, by the computing device, a further user interface enabling the user to create the user- specific content. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the forming the personalized video: providing, by the computing device on a live image of a camera view, a face outline at a predetermined position in the camera view; querying, by the computing device, the user whether the face of the user is centered in the face outline; receiving, by the computing device, a request from the user to take the self-image of the user; and taking, by the computing device, in response to the receiving the request, the self-image of the user. 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: providing, by the computing device, a first option enabling the user to confirm using the user-specific content for generating the personalized video; and providing, by the computing device, a second option enabling the user to change the user- specific content to a further user-specific content. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the forming the personalized video includes: modifying the self-image to generate a modified self-image, the modified self-image being adjusted to adopt a facial expression corresponding to facial landmark parameters; and inserting the modified self-image into the stock video at location parameters corresponding to a position of the marker in the stock video. 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the user-specific content is created using a camera associated with the computing device. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the forming the personalized video: providing, by the computing device on a live image of a camera view, a face outline at a predetermined position in the camera view; querying, by the computing device, the user whether the face of the user is centered in the face outline; receiving, by the computing device, a request from the user to take the self-image of the user; and taking, by the computing device, in response to the receiving the request, the self-image of the user. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing device is configured to download the plurality of videos from a remote database. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing device is configured to download the plurality of stock videos from a remote database. Regarding Claims 11-20 are rejected same reason as Claims 1-10. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAYEZ A BHUIYAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 - 6:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAYEZ A. BHUIYAN/ Examiner Art Unit 2639 /LIN YE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671892
METHOD AND DISPLAY APPARATUS FOR IMAGE PROCESSING
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672369
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665996
DIGITAL CINEMA CAMERA SYSTEM FOR RECORDING, EDITING AND VISUALIZING IMAGES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654618
CONTROLLER SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659600
ANTI-GLARE SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE SENSOR AND METHOD OF REDUCING GLARE IN VEHICLE SENSOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 4m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month