Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/183,627

SORTING DEVICE AND FEED RAIL FOR PLASTIC PREFORMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 18, 2025
Priority
Jul 11, 2018 — DE 10 2018 116 841.1 +2 more
Examiner
MCKANE, ELIZABETH L
Art Unit
3991
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Krones AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
144 granted / 230 resolved
+2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 230 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Reissue – Non-Final Office Action For reissue applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, all references to 35 U.S.C. 251 and 37 CFR 1.172, 1.175, and 3.73 are to the current provisions. Improper Amendment The amendment filed 18 April 2025 proposes amendments to the claims that do not comply with 37 CFR 1.173(b), which sets forth the manner of making amendments in reissue applications. Specifically, claim 1 contains strikethrough. However, in reissue the matter to be omitted by reissue must be enclosed in single brackets. See MPEP 1453; 37 CFR 1.173(d). 35 USC §251 The reissue oath/declaration filed with this application is defective because the error which is relied upon to support the reissue application is not an error upon which a reissue can be based. See 37 CFR 1.175 and MPEP § 1414. The Applicant has provided the error statement of “New prior art was discovered after the patent grant”. MPEP § 1414.II(A) states A reissue applicant must acknowledge the existence of an error in the specification, drawings, or claims, which error causes the original patent to be defective. In re Wilder, 736 F.2d 1516, 222 USPQ 369 (Fed. Cir. 1984). A change or departure from the original specification or claims represents an "error" in the original patent under 35 U.S.C. 251. See MPEP § 1402 for a discussion of grounds for filing a reissue that may constitute the "error" required by 35 U.S.C. 251. Not all changes with respect to the patent constitute the "error" required by 35 U.S.C. 251. The discovery of new prior art or the correction of a clerical error in a claim does not cause the original patent to be defective. The Applicant has not acknowledged the existence of an error in the specification, drawings or claims, which error causes the original patent to be defective. See MPEP §1402 for an explanation of errors that are correctable by reissue. Claims 1-20 are rejected as being based upon a defective reissue declaration under 35 U.S.C. 251 as set forth above. See 37 CFR 1.175. The nature of the defect(s) in the declaration is set forth in the discussion above in this Office action. The claims have not been further reviewed under prior art due to the lack of error. Information Disclosure Statement The documents cited on the Information Disclosure Statements were not considered because there is no error upon which a reissue can be based. Conclusion It is noted that the lack of rejection under 35 U.S.C. §102 and 103 is not an indication of allowability of the claims. The claims have not been examined with respect to prior art due to the lack of a proper error for reissue. Applicant is reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.178(b), to timely apprise the Office of any prior or concurrent proceeding in which Patent No. 11,712,833 is or was involved. These proceedings would include any trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, interferences, reissues, reexaminations, supplemental examinations, and litigation. Applicant is further reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.56, to timely apprise the Office of any information which is material to patentability of the claims under consideration in this reissue application. These obligations rest with each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of this application for reissue. See also MPEP §§ 1404, 1442.01 and 1442.04. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIZABETH L MCKANE whose telephone number is (571)272-1275. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6:30a-4:30p EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patricia Engle can be reached at 571-272-6660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIZABETH L MCKANE/Specialist, Art Unit 3991 Conferees: /LEE E SANDERSON/Reexamination Specialist, Art Unit 3991 /Patricia L Engle/SPRS, Art Unit 3991
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660856
TUBULAR HEATING BODY AND AEROSOL-GENERATING APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent RE50896
APPARATUS FOR TESTING A LIQUID SPECIMEN
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent RE50886
MULTI-ARRAY EJECTION HEAD AND METHOD OF USE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent RE50879
METHOD FOR EXTRUDING AND LABELLING A CYLINDRICAL PRODUCT
1y 12m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent RE50846
Systems and methods for capacitive fluid level detection, and handling containers
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+25.8%)
3y 1m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 230 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month