Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/184,052

RETRACTABLE SHAVER BUR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 21, 2025
Priority
Dec 13, 2018 — provisional 62/779,031 +3 more
Examiner
WOODALL, NICHOLAS W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Conmed Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
962 granted / 1172 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1200
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1172 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Heisler (U.S. Publication 2010/0198242). Heisler discloses a device (for example see Figures 2-14) comprising: (claim 1) a shaving burr (100) including: (claim 1) an inner assembly (12) having (claim 1) an inner hub (16) with (claim 1) an inner tube (14) extending distally from the inner hub (claim 1) wherein the inner tube terminates in a distal bur tip (18, 19, 20, etc.; a broadest reasonable interpretation of the term “bur” is a small surgical cutting tool (as for making an opening in bone (www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bur)) (claim 1) an outer assembly (2) having (claim 1) an outer hub (6) with (claim 1) an outer tube (4) extending distally from the outer hub (claim 1) wherein the inner tube is within the outer tube (claim 1) aa deployment mechanism (paragraph 24) connected to the outer hub (claim 3) wherein the deployment mechanism is a disk rotatable in a first direction and a second direction (30 and 50; for example see paragraphs 28 and 57) Heisler discloses a method of using the device discussed above comprising: (claim 1) providing the shaving bur (claim 1) moving the deployment mechanism in a first direction causing the distal burr tip to extend from the outer tube (for example see paragraphs 64-65; the axial motion of the inner shaft caused by the rotation of the deployment mechanism in either direction extends the distal bur tip to extend into the opening of the outer tube, i.e. extend from the outer tube) (claim 1) resecting bone with the distal bur tip (paragraph 77) (claim 2) moving the deployment mechanism in a second direction cause the distal bur tip to be retracted into the outer tube (for example see paragraph 28; the axial motion of the inner shaft caused by the rotation of the deployment mechanism in either direction retracts the distal bur tip to retract from the opening of the outer tube, i.e. retract into the outer tube) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 for cited references the examiner felt were relevant to the application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nicholas Woodall whose telephone number is (571) 272-5204. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am to 5:30pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong, at (571. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS W WOODALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12690783
LIGAMENT BALANCING TOOL AND METHOD FOR SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685520
STERNAL ASCENDER APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12667396
INTRAMEDULLARY TIBIAL NAIL WITH VARIABLE ANGLE SCREW OPENINGS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667387
Flexible Intraosseous Obturator
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653567
SURGICAL DEVICES CONTROLLABLE BY SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+13.2%)
3y 3m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month