Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/184,268

BLADDER, A PACKER TOOL ASSEMBLY AND A METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING THE PACKER TOOL ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 21, 2025
Priority
Apr 25, 2024 — EU 24172317.0
Examiner
MCNALLY, DANIEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Boldan OY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
697 granted / 1026 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1056
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1026 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7, 13, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the wall of the pocket" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 2 establishes “a pocket wall,” however claim 7 does not depend from claim 2. One potential resolution to the lack of antecedent basis would be to amend claim 6 to depend from claim 2. Claim 13 recites the limitation “the hole of the pocket” in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 2 establishes “a hole,” however claim 13 does not depend from nor incorporate the subject matter of claim 2. One potential resolution to the lack of antecedent basis would be to amend claim 12, line 3 to recite –a bladder according to claim 2--. Claim 16 recites the limitation “the hole” in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. One potential resolution to the lack of antecedent basis would be to amend claim 15 to depend form claim 13, assuming the above issue with claim 13 is resolved. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6, 8-12, and 14-15 are allowed. Claims 7, 13 and 16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art fails to anticipate, teach, suggest or otherwise render obvious each and every element of the claims. Independent claim 1 discloses a blader including, inter alia, a pocket on the inside of the body, the pocket defining a pocket volume configured for receiving an end piece of a packer tool, so as to rotationally engage therewith. Tuomi [FI126533B] discloses a blader with a main section, and branch section. Tuomi fails to disclose a pocket with the configuration as required by the claims. Claim 1 is allowable as the prior art fails to disclose the details of the pocket as required by the claim, in combination with the other features of the claim. Claims 2-16 incorporate the allowable subject matter of claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL MCNALLY whose telephone number is (571)272-2685. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 571-270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL MCNALLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746 DPM June 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734075
Split Formation of Unitary Substrates
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738525
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721757
METHOD FOR PROCESSING NONWOVEN SHEETS BY COMBINED ACTIVATION AND BONDING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722345
METHOD FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC WELDING OF MOLDED PARTS AND A HEAT SINK FOR USE IN SUCH METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703809
METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRODUCT, ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND FOAMING ADHESIVE SHEET
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+13.7%)
3y 0m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1026 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month