Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 19/185,898

INJECTION MOLDING METHOD AND DEFORMABLE MOLDING UNIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 22, 2025
Priority
May 08, 2024 — TW 113116975
Examiner
YI, STELLA KIM
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Arcadyan Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
698 granted / 981 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 09/18/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 13-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 09/18/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by KIMOTO et al. (5,350,288). Regarding claims 1-2, KIMOTO et al. discloses an injection molding method comprising: performing a mold positioning step (Fig. 1) to define a mold cavity, the mold positioning step comprising: providing a deformable molding unit on a first axis, the deformable molding unit having a deformable cavity (33) and comprising a bottom portion (34c) and a first elastic portion (34a) connected to the bottom portion (see Fig.2), the bottom portion and the first elastic portion being connected to the deformable cavity (33), the first elastic portion (34a) being elastically deformable with respect to the bottom portion (34c), and the deformable cavity having an original dimension (Figs.1-2); and applying, by a first drive module, a first compression force to the first elastic portion along a second axis perpendicular to the first axis, such that the first elastic portion deforms with respect to the bottom portion and the deformable cavity is reduced to a reduced dimension (C6:L40-50); injecting plastic into the mold cavity comprising the deformable cavity with the reduced dimension to form a workpiece (Fig.1; claim 3); releasing, by the first drive module, the first compression force, such that the first elastic portion is returned and the deformable cavity is restored to the original dimension (C6:L40-50; Fig.1); and retracting the deformable molding unit along the first axis (Figs.1-2). Regarding claim 3, KIMOTO et al. discloses clamping a top molding unit (37-Fig.3), the deformable molding unit and a bottom molding unit together on a third axis to form the mold cavity, wherein the first axis, the second axis and the third axis are mutually perpendicular (Fig.4, Figs.1-2). Regarding claim 4, KIMOTO et al. discloses wherein the first elastic portion comprises a first positioning structure at a location where it is in contact with the top molding unit (37-Figs.1-2). Regarding claim 5, KIMOTO et al. discloses separating the top molding unit (33) from the deformable molding unit (34) along the third axis to expose the workpiece (32) (Fig.2). Regarding claim 6, KIMOTO et al. discloses wherein the step of releasing the first compression force by the first driving module is performed after the step of separating the top molding unit from the deformable molding unit along the third axis (Fig.2). Regarding claim 8, KIMOTO et al. discloses wherein the deformable molding unit further comprises a second elastic portion (34b) connected to the bottom portion (34c), and the first elastic portion (34a) and the second elastic portion (34b) are arranged on the bottom portion (34c) at spaced intervals along the second axis (Fig.2). Regarding claim 9, KIMOTO et al. discloses wherein the deformable cavity (33) is formed between the first elastic portion (34b), the second elastic portion (34a) and the bottom portion (34c), and the first elastic portion, the second elastic portion and the bottom portion are in contact with the deformable cavity (Fig.2). Regarding claim 10, KIMOTO et al. discloses wherein each of the first elastic portion, the second elastic portion and the bottom portion has a textured structure on a surface in contact with the deformable cavity (Fig.2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 11, and 12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: a) JP 57205126 discloses a mold forming method. b) TW 175269 discloses injection molding method. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STELLA KIM YI whose telephone number is (571)270-5123. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STELLA YI Examiner Art Unit 1742 /STELLA K YI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766801
PREPARATION METHOD OF BISMUTH ION FUNCTIONAL GRAPHENE AGRICULTURAL FILM
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766785
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTINUOUS COMPOSITE THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12741316
METHOD OF CONTROLLING AN IRRADIATION SYSTEM, IRRADIATION SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL WORK PIECE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733637
INSTRINSICALLY ANTIMICROBIAL POROSIC MATRIX COMPOSITES AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734728
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN PELLETS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THERMOPLASTIC RESIN PELLETS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.4%)
3y 2m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month