Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/186,831

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING POWER CONSUMPTION VALUE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Priority
Apr 26, 2024 — JP 2024-072932
Examiner
BEATTY, ROBERT B
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1166 granted / 1260 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1277
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-9,11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 2, line 3, the applicant uses the phrase “predetermined period” which is unclear since this lacks antecedent basis. It is assumed the “predetermined period” applicant is referring is the time period each time the power consumption value is obtained however clarification is requested. It is noted claim 1, recites both a “time period” (line 10) and consumption values acquired at a plurality of times or time periods (lines 15-16). In claim 11, line 3, the phrase “entire of the” should be changed to -- the entire --. In claim 12, last two lines seem redundant. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1,10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hirota (U.S. 8,909,078). Hirota teach an image forming apparatus 1 (see Fig.10) including a fixing module 411 having a heater 412 to heat a toner image to a recording sheet and a processor 300 (see Fig.1) to control the operations of the image forming apparatus (col.4, lines 3-7). A power source unit 200 supplies power to the image forming apparatus including the fixing module via a power meter 100 (col.4, lines 42-46). A power consumption value will be obtained for the fixing module during a time period the heater is generating heat; the power consumption value being obtained by measuring the current and voltage supplied to the heater at a plurality of measurement times (col.4, lines 62-67; col.5, lines 8-12); the accumulated power consumption amount will be averaged over a certain time period/operational mode (col.8, lines 18-51). A specific mode the image forming apparatus is in (rising mode, sleep mode, print mode, standby mode) will change the target temperature the fixing heater will obtain and thus the controlling temperature and the electric power supplied to the heater will also vary (see col.5, lines 30 – col.7, line 3). The target temperature of standby mode is 170°C while the target temperature of a printing/copying mode is 230°C. Thus, the “control value” for determining the fixing temperature of the fixing heater is the detected mode the image forming apparatus is currently operating in. Regarding claims 10-11, while it has been described that the power consumption values are obtained for the fixing module, the disclosure is not limited to just the fixing module but to the entire image forming apparatus and its associated operational modules (i.e. scanner, image forming unit, conveying unit, etc.) which would include the entire image forming apparatus. It is noted that applicant does not claim the power consumption values are obtained separately for each module. Regarding claim 12, a display can show consumed electric energy of the entire image forming apparatus which would include the fixing module. See col.10, lines 4-10. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, acquiring a control value for each time period the power consumption value is obtained and acquiring power consumption values based on the value of the electric power supplied to the heating element from an external power supply and in accordance with the control value Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Okunishi et al. describes obtaining a power consumption amount of at least the fixing module by accumulating a plurality of consumption values over time. Gon et al., Hirano, Takagi et al. all teach obtaining power consumption values for a fixing module. Kojima teach a display for showing power consumption values. Miyamoto and Miyamoto et al. are related applications. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT B BEATTY whose telephone number is (571) 272-2130. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 7 to 3. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Stephanie Bloss, can be reached on (571) 272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-2130. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /ROBERT B BEATTY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748366
FUSING BASED ON BELT TEMPERATURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736899
MEMBER AND TONER CARTRIDGE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730392
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730409
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724370
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+3.1%)
1y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month