Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/186,841

MONITORING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR A SPRINKLER PUMP TEST RUN

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Priority
Apr 24, 2024 — DE 10 2024 111 475.4 +1 more
Examiner
BERTHEAUD, PETER JOHN
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mecon GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
824 granted / 1054 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1078
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1054 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species IV in the reply filed on 6/1/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is found persuasive. The requirement has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 20-22, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sdano US 2003/0015840 A1 in view of Hogholt 6,250,876. Sdano discloses, regarding claims 1, 20, and 29, a water extinguishing system (intended use) with a monitoring apparatus 120 (see embodiment in Fig. 7) for a pump test run of a sprinkler pump 14 (element 14 is capable of supplying water to a sprinkler – see paragraph [0027]), the sprinkler pump 14 comprises: at least one pump housing 22 surrounding a wet chamber (see para. [0027]), a drive shaft 12 arranged sealed against the pump housing 22 by a gland packing 10/27, and a drive mechanically coupled to the drive shaft 12 (see para. [0028]), the gland packing 10/27 being configured for the passage of leakage fluid from the pump housing 22 into a dry chamber 122 (see Fig. 7), the monitoring apparatus 120 comprises a measuring unit 123 adapted to detect the leakage fluid passing through the gland packing 10/27 from the pump housing 22 into the dry chamber 122 during the pump test run. However, Sdano does not explicity disclose the measuring unit being configured to generate a stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump and/or an alarm signal when the flow rate falls below a predefined minimum. Sdano DOES disclose that the measuring unit 123 is configured to generate a stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump and/or an alarm signal when the flow rate exceeds a threshold value (see para. 0059]). With that in mind, Hogholt teaches a seal and sensor arrangement for a pump (see impeller 3) comprising: at least one pump housing surrounding a wet chamber (clearly shown in Fig 1, surrounding impeller 3), a drive shaft 5 arranged sealed against the pump housing by a gland packing (see 7), the gland packing (7) being configured for the passage of leakage fluid from the pump housing, a monitoring apparatus 16/18 comprises a measuring unit 18 adapted to detect the leakage fluid passing through the gland packing (7) from the pump housing (see col. 1, lines 24-28, and col. 3, lines 1-7); further regarding claims 1, 20, and 29, the measuring unit 18 may be configured to generate a stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump and/or an alarm signal when the flow rate falls below a predefined minimum (see col. 3, lines 1-7 and col 3, line 66 to col. 4, line 5 – this disclosure makes it clear that threshold values “may be adjusted to obtain the most advantageous [operation]” – this would include a predefined minimum, as claimed). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to have modified the configuration of Sdano by generating a stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump and/or an alarm signal when the flow rate falls below a predefined minimum, as taught by Hogholt, in order to allow for a controlled amount of leakage to prevent false system failures, and because the structural/control software elements of Sdano would clearly by capable of such a configutation. Re claim 2, Sdano further discloses that the monitoring apparatus 120 also has a control unit 81, the control unit 81 being connected to the measuring unit 123 and the drive in a signal-conducting manner, the control unit 81 or the measuring unit 123 being configured to generate the alarm signal and/or the stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump (see para. 0059]). Re claim 3, Sdano further discloses that the measuring unit 123 comprises a collecting vessel 125 configured to detect the leakage fluid and the measuring unit 123 is configured to detect the leakage fluid in the collecting vessel 125 based on at least one fill level (substantially broad, this is clearly the case – see para. 0059]). Re claim 21, Sdano further discloses that the monitoring apparatus includes a control unit 81 being connected to the measuring unit 123 and the drive in a signal-conducting manner, and wherein the generation of the alarm signal and/or the stop signal to switch off the sprinkler pump 14 taking place by the control unit 81 or the measuring unit 123. Re claim 22, Sdano further discloses detecting the leakage fluid in a collecting vessel 125 based on at least one fill level of the leakage fluid in the collecting vessel 125 by the measuring unit 123 (substantially broad, this is clearly the case – see para. 0059]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-19 and 23-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Peter J Bertheaud whose telephone number is (571)272-3476. The examiner can normally be reached 9am - 5pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Laurenzi can be reached at 5712707878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PJB /PETER J BERTHEAUD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746325
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR PRIMING A FLUID MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742379
INTEGRATING DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE WITH MACHINE LEARNING TO OPTIMIZE ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PERFORMANCE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736037
ROTARY SWASH PLATE HYDRAULIC PUMP
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736058
MOTOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN APPLIANCE SUCH AS A VACUUM CLEANER AND A VACUUM CLEANER HAVING SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723590
STICK PUMP ASSEMBLY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.4%)
3y 0m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1054 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month