Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/187,535

TOUCH LAYER, TOUCH SUBSTRATE, AND TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Examiner
MARINELLI, PATRICK
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 776 resolved
+1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are currently pending and prosecuted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites, “wherein the main line is divided into multiple groups, and each group of the main line comprises one first main line and a plurality of second main lines; the first main line comprises two branch sections extending away from each other, and each of the plurality of second main lines comprises only one branch section; in each group of the main line, the first main line has a longest extension length along the third direction; in each group of the main line, the farther a second main line is from the first main line, the shorter an extension length of the second main line along the third direction is, and the longer an extension length of a branch line of the second main line along the outer contour of the pattern of the corresponding touch electrode is”. However, the specification and the drawings, particularly paragraphs [0104-0106] and Figure 11, fail to disclose or describe that a “main line” is divided into a “multiple groups”, how each of these groups comprise of “one first main line and a plurality of second main lines”, how the “first main line” comprises of “two branch sections” while each of the ”second main lines” comprises of “only one branch section”, that the “first main line” is the one that has a longest extension length along the third direction, that “the farther a second main line is from the first main line, the shorter an extension length of the second main line along the third direction is”, and that “the longer an extension length of a branch line of the second main line along the outer contour of the pattern of the corresponding touch electrode is”. Claims 13 and 20, which recite similar limitations, are also rejected for the same rationale. Claims 2-12, and 14-19, which are dependent from Claims 1 and 13, are also rejected for the same rationale. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F MARINELLI whose telephone number is (571)270-3383. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at (571)-272-7495. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F MARINELLI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596403
SLIDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591270
COMPUTING DEVICE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591299
METHOD, SERVER AND DEVICE FOR OUTPUTTING XR CONTENT CORRESPONDING TO A TARGET WITHIN A CONSTRUCTION SITE BASED ON VOICE RECOGNITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586502
INTEGRATED DRIVING DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586500
COMPENSATION CIRCUIT FOR STRETCHABLE DISPLAY AND STRETCHABLE DISPLAY INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month