Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/187,868

Glasses hanger

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Priority
Nov 22, 2024 — CN 2024228600458
Examiner
SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Yiwu Weimiao Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
677 granted / 1077 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1118
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1077 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "groove-like structures" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "hole-like structure" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 5-10 are rejected as depending from a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sieger, U.S. Design Patent D487,344 in view of Fernandez, FR 2,965,706. Regarding Claim 1, Sieger teaches: A hanger body (see below), wherein the hanger body is provided with a through hole (see below) with a strip-shaped hole structure (see below), the hanger body is further provided with a hanging hole (see below) with a rectangular hole structure, the hanging hole is connected to the through hole , a width of the hanging hole (see below) is smaller than the width of the through hole, and the hanging hole is arranged to hang a temple bending (see Claim); a rotating shaft (see below)…a limiting plate (see below) is rotatably provided on the rotating shaft (see below), and the limiting plate is located in the through hole (see below). Sieger does not teach: A rotating shaft is threadedly connected to the hanger body. Fernandez teaches an eyeglass holder with a threaded hole for a fastening screw (see Abstract, see Figs. 3A, B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to provide Sieger with a threaded hole for the shaft as taught by Fernandez because the threaded connection would impose a strain on the shaft when the hanging element is flipped up and this would allow a user to access a pocket which is covered up by the eyeglass hanging device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J SULLIVAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5218. The examiner can normally be reached IFP, Typically M-Th, 8:00-6:00, regular Fr availability. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J SULLIVAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12687060
System for the controlled rotary movement of a door, a leaf or the like
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12660887
ANTI-BREAKING CLAW ROPE RETRACTOR AND SHOE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12637890
SLIDING CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLY AND BYPASS DOOR ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637886
Removable Center Guide for Shower Doors
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638040
Fastener Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.6%)
2y 6m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1077 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month